Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: dangus
I stand corrected. James Joyce is the supreme literary navel-gazer of all time. UGH.

Re lacking Dreiser: you ain't missing much. Life is too short to read sucky books someone used to think were good.
37 posted on 09/09/2004 11:10:20 AM PDT by Xenalyte (All of whom I've read, dammit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: Xenalyte
I read recently that Joyce's Ulysses is so abstruse because Joyce got the preliminary print back from the publisher and scribbled a bunch of notes to himself all through it: these were later incorporated into the first printing as well as the editor could guess because for some reason, Joyce never got another crack at re-editing. I dunno, I wasn't there. I had to read Portrait in college and the only thing I remember now is that the protagonist refused to scratch himself when he got itchy...
52 posted on 09/09/2004 11:24:43 AM PDT by Argh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson