Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Xenalyte

I hate to tell you, but I've never read Dreiser. I kinda bounced around the tracking system in public school like a ping-pong ball. My understanding is that James Joyce is the all-time most boring author in history, and that the literati like to talk about him because he is so incoherent that it makes them seem smart.

OTOH, I've also heard the literati complain that people bought "A Brief History of Time" to make themselves look smart, but that no-one could actually read it. To the contrary, I found it had a most brilliant manner of teaching the abstractions of physics to the hoi palloi. I think the literati might simply not be that smart. I mean how many critics complained they couldn't follow Mission Impossible, a movie based on a Tom-and-Jerry episode, for Pete's sake.


35 posted on 09/09/2004 11:08:48 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: dangus
I stand corrected. James Joyce is the supreme literary navel-gazer of all time. UGH.

Re lacking Dreiser: you ain't missing much. Life is too short to read sucky books someone used to think were good.
37 posted on 09/09/2004 11:10:20 AM PDT by Xenalyte (All of whom I've read, dammit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: dangus
Reading James Joyce is a running reminder that my attention span isn't what it used to be. Hmmm. Maybe it was to great in the first place.
47 posted on 09/09/2004 11:16:14 AM PDT by oyez (¡Qué viva la revolución de Reagan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson