Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Packers fire defensive coordinator
JSOnline ^ | 01/11/04 | self

Posted on 01/16/2004 8:25:04 AM PST by brewcrew

Five days after the Packers bowed out of the playoffs in frustrating fashion, Ed Donatell was fired as the team's defensive coordinator. Tight ends coach Jeff Jagodzinski was also let go. Story to come


TOPICS: Sports
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-262 next last
To: BluH2o
Nope... nuttin' about where he's going, but there is some buzz about who'll being looked at to replace him. Gunther Cunningham is one name dropped... he was DC for Marty Schottenheimer, then when marty left (released) Gunther took over as HC, till he proved he didn't have the stuff to be HC... but he was a hellova DC. Don't know if he'd want to come back to KC. Anyway, enjoy games this weekend and God bless...
241 posted on 01/16/2004 7:39:02 PM PST by Godfollow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: blackdog
A few Andre Waters type safety blitzes from a guy who knows how to hit would have knocked McNabb into a fetal posed, trembling scaredy-girl.

If you can do that with 8 sacks, how many do you need? Sixteen?

242 posted on 01/16/2004 10:08:18 PM PST by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard (E-A-G-L-E-S... Eagles!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: over3Owithabrain
But they weren't the better team as you put it. They needed a near-miracle 27 yard hail mary to avoid a defeat that would have left all of Philly cursing McNabb and his team once again.

And how exactly did the Packers get into the playoffs? Arizona. 4th & 25. McCown completes a 28 yard touchdown pass to beat the Vikings.

Kinda fitting that they get knocked out on a 28 yard McNabb completion on 4th & 26, if you ask me. Live by the 4th & Forever, die by the 4th & Forever...

243 posted on 01/16/2004 10:13:00 PM PST by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard (E-A-G-L-E-S... Eagles!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Duke809
Didn't he throw something like 6 picks against the Falcons in the playoffs last year or the year before and kill GB's further playoff hopes?

7 INT's against the Rams in '01, 2 against the Falcons in '02.

But it's some sort of fluke when he throws one under a rush against the Eagles.

244 posted on 01/16/2004 10:37:30 PM PST by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard (E-A-G-L-E-S... Eagles!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: over3Owithabrain
That was not just a terrible, but a very weird pass. I thought he punted the ball for a second there.

245 posted on 01/16/2004 10:46:04 PM PST by My Dog Likes Me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: discostu
Favre was excellent last week. He faced one of the NFL's most experienced, talented and aggressive Defensive Generals in Jimmy Johnson, and more than held his own against his creative blitz and coverage schemes. Nobody but Favre could have set up the game long running, passing and field position prowess that the Packers demonstrated against the Eagles Sunday. Favre is one of the best ever, and when he looks stupid, it's usually one of his teammates that makes a mistake ... not him. He saw, and obviously assumed, an improvisational big play advantage on that last INT that his receiver didn't see or understand. Frankly, I think he may have thought one of the Eagles blitzers was offside and that he'd either have a free play or, given Green Bay's usually excellent broken play execution, enough time to exploit a mismatch. There was no offsides, the Packers missed blocks, the receiver missed his audible, and Favre looks like an idiot.

Philadelphia was undermanned in this game, the Packers had superior athletic matchups on the field, given all the Eagles injuries to key players. The Eagles prevailed because Andy Reid has the best coaching staff in the NFL and three of the best playmakers in McNabb, Dawkins and Akers. Reid and Marty Mohrninwig both COACHED Favre in Green Bay, Johnson is one of the best ... yet the Packers moved the ball with impunity. Because Brett's passing threat and audible skill set up all the Green runs and downfield passing.

The Packers were outcoached last Sunday. That's a defecit that the Panthers will have to overcome as well. The Eagles run will likely end at SuperBowl MMMMXXXCIIII to the 10th power, when they run into an equally well coached Bill Belicheck team that is healthy.

In other words: The Packers were SCREWED! ;^)

246 posted on 01/16/2004 11:55:49 PM PST by ArneFufkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: Freebird Forever
In terms of rings won, probably not. But statistically, Brett's already left them in the dust.

Favre would have won as many, or more, championships as any QB in history had he been surrounded with the annual, unchanging supporting cast talent that the QBs of the pre-free agency 50s, 60s, 70s and 80s like Unitas, Bradshaw, Staubach, Montana and Elway enjoyed. The rosters of those talented teams remained unchanged for eight to ten years at a time. Let's see Montana, Staubach, Marino, Unitas and Elway throw to Bill Schroeder, Antonio Freeman, Robert Brooks, Corey Bradford, Derrick Mayes, Bubba Franks and Robert Ferguson throughout his career and rack up the numbers Favre has. Behind a OL that has been fully replaced three times over. With no running game until Ahman Green in 2000.

Brett is a constant great in the new era. He wins two out of three games he plays, for 13 years running. Let's keep our eyes on Manning, McNabb, Vick and all the rest and see how they hold up as they lead teams sporting new receivers, linemen, RBs and coaching schemes every three or four years.

Favre is better than every other QB but Elway and Unitas.

247 posted on 01/17/2004 12:17:42 AM PST by ArneFufkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: TaMoDee
"My point is that a "coach" must rise above the ordinary and let it all hang out."

I'm still not so quick to blame Sherman here. I don't know if Holmgren let it all hang out either. Everybody makes bad decisions, like Holmgren's not running Levens more in the Superbowl vs Denver. That probably would have won us the game.

I think the Packers have retooled nicely since Sherman took over. One of the big developments this year is that FINALLY Favre's receivers are starting to make plays. Walker, Furguson and Driver are starting to play like a top-notch receiving team. This is something the Pack hasn't had since Brooks, Chamura and Freeman (PRIOR to their Superbowl win).

So with the best running game in the league and an up and coming passing attack, Grady Jackson and the D coming around (we've clearly got the personnel on D), Sherman has done an extraordinary job refurbishing this team. By the time Favre retires, there won't be the huge drop-off the way there would have been a few years ago. (In fact, with some of his bad interceptions, it might be a blessing.)

Basically, I think Sherman has rebuilt the team w/o ever falling to less than 9-7. How many other teams have been as good for as long without falling at least for a year into the cellar? The team Sherman inherited was well on its way to the bottom, just like every other one-time contender.
248 posted on 01/17/2004 6:08:17 AM PST by Tricorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

To: ArneFufkin
"Favre would have won as many, or more, championships as any QB in history had he been surrounded with the annual, unchanging supporting cast talent that the QBs of the pre-free agency"

Ain't this the truth!! Did you know, folks, that when the Packers dominated -- and I mean DOMINATED -- the NFL in 1996, they went to the Superbowl with Strickland (I don't even remember his first name) and Seth Joyner at LB (I honestly can't even remember the third one). Andre Rison and Keith Jackson were their go-to receivers. Rison was picked up just a few weeks before the game. Their top running back was Edgar Bennett.

In short, put Bradshaw, McNabb, Staubach, Tarkenton, McMahon, Marino, Montana, Vick etc on this team and see how far they go.
249 posted on 01/17/2004 6:24:44 AM PST by Tricorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: ArneFufkin
I had no idea we were already up to Superbowl 4074 already.

Yep the Packers hosed themselves. And I'm not taking anything away from the Eagles, the other team screwing up isn't enough to win a playoff game the Eagles needed to capitalize and they did. The Eagles kept their mistakes small and made the Packers mistakes big, they earned the win.
250 posted on 01/17/2004 7:40:44 AM PST by discostu (and the tenor sax is blowing its nose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies]

To: over3Owithabrain
Those that can,do. Those who can't, criticize.

Man that's really weak.

To the contrary, it’s entirely spot on.

Hiding behind a pen, microphone or keyboard & criticizing the performance of another is a far easier task than to step up and affect the performance itself. Especially when one has envy & jealousy along as henchmen.

Perhaps that is lost on you. So be it.

And I don't care what formula you're using to put Moon and Tarkenton at the top of alltimers, but that's weak too.

Your lack of analytical skill and resourcefulness is glaringly obvious.

The only “formula” required was the ability to observe and quote from the list of NFL career leaders under the category of Passing Yards. I simply noted the only four players who have thrown for more yards.

And since you conveniently evaded the only question I posed to you, I’ll ask it one more time:

Who resides in the all time "upper tier" by your standards, and how did they earn that status?

And I’ll add this one:

What factors are applied in determining the low end cut off to your All Time Upper Tier list?

A well thought out response would be appreciated, but certainly isn’t expected.

251 posted on 01/17/2004 8:42:42 AM PST by Freebird Forever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: Freebird Forever
Perhaps you shuold read/comprehend a post if you wish to respond to it. I did reiterate my judgment of Bradshaw/Montana as greater than Favre. Please read and think before spewing. You did NOT qualify your alltime greats with passing yards like you're doing now. Yardage alone means squat - a team could be losing often (Tarkenton/Moon), hence more balls thrown in the air. Funny of you to criticize (which you are allowed to do but not others apparently) my analysis when yours is so lacking. By your crappy logic, there would be no movie reviews, sports post-game wrapups, discussions around the water cooler, etc. Somehow I think you take part in that too, but are attacking me simply to defend your opinion of Favre and your disagreement with my opinion. Keep in mind that you too are "hiding" behind a keyboard so it's easy for you to make your comments insulting and personal. Please don't waste my time anymore - this is too trivial. Enjoy the games tomorrow as I will.
252 posted on 01/17/2004 9:14:01 AM PST by over3Owithabrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: Tricorn
Are you a member of the Green Packer Organization in anyway shape or form? You are too smooth in your answers.

If not, then a sports writer on the take of the Packers.


253 posted on 01/17/2004 7:52:02 PM PST by TaMoDee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: discostu
What you mnean is that on at least six occasions Simon got knocked off the play so completely

what I mean is that given many offensive formations and shifts, the DT can only reasonably be expected to hold his own and allow the linebacker(s) to make tackles.

If that book is where you got all your football knowledge

it was actually a suggestion for YOU - now beat it, loser.

254 posted on 01/17/2004 10:03:10 PM PST by Libertarian4Bush (may contain traces of peanuts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: Freebird Forever
So, should Vinnie be in the Hall?
Sure, why not?

I'm a big, big Vinny fan, but he should not be in the hall. and neither should ANY player be in there based solely on numbers, individual records excepted. (lies, damn lies, statistics, etc.) The standards for the HoF in respective sports are WAY too low.

statistics need to be put into context. testaverde, as much as I like him, never won a big game; the biggest he played in was at Denver in the (1998?) AFC title game. longevity doesn't make you great or representative. it just makes you old.

but I digress; my gripe was with your "affirmative action" comment, which was, at best, immature, at worst, racist.

255 posted on 01/17/2004 10:09:45 PM PST by Libertarian4Bush (may contain traces of peanuts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: Tricorn
In short, put Bradshaw, McNabb, Staubach, Tarkenton, McMahon, Marino, Montana, Vick etc on this team and see how far they go.

everyone loves a gunslinger, but last I checked, the last three champs (tampa, new england, baltimore) were defense-oriented.

don't forget, guys named dilfer, brady, and hostetler have as many superbowl wins as brett favre.

this isn't to say they're his equal, but if favre doesn't win in 1997, he's accomplished about as much in the postseason as, say, randall cunningham.

but it was silly of me to think the idol worship would end when he lost a playoff game in Bobby Hebert fashion.

even if the eagles lose on sunday, mcnabb led a bunch of role-players farther this year than brett favre has led decent stars in the past 5 years.

256 posted on 01/17/2004 10:18:27 PM PST by Libertarian4Bush (may contain traces of peanuts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: Libertarian4Bush
Except DTs are not only expected to hold their own and allow linebackers to make the tackle. DTs are expected to penetrate PAST the offensive line and interupt the play in the backfield. Which Simon did NOT do last week because he played poorly.

You're the one that came back, and demonstrated AGAIN that you know nothing about football and are only interested in insults. Sad sad sad. Too bad I already picked the Eagles to win tomorrow, rest assured that thanks to your behavior I will be rooting against them.
257 posted on 01/17/2004 10:28:47 PM PST by discostu (and the tenor sax is blowing its nose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: Libertarian4Bush
"this isn't to say they're his equal, but if favre doesn't win in 1997, he's accomplished about as much in the postseason as, say, randall cunningham."

I assume you mean perennial MVP candidate Donovan F. McNabb, and not Randall Cunningham.

As of the 1996 playoffs, Favre had already set a number of post-season QB records. This was his 6th year in the NFL -- a career which included a wasted rookie season in Atlanta. The Packers, incidentally, had been losers for the 20 years -- 20!! -- prior to Favre showing up. Pretty impressive -- unless you're inclined to attribute the Packers almost unparalleled success over the past 10 years to Edgar Bennet or Ron Cox.

If you mean simply winning the big one, well, I believe it was you yourself who sited the distinction between pre- and post-free angency. The year after the Pack's SB victory (I'm sure you've heard stories of these), the chiseling away began.

And what's this "IF Favre doesn't win in 97" business? How about this instead: "IF" the MacNabb-led Eagles had won the Superbowl in either of the past two years or had even gotten there, I would believe the McNabb-led Eagles might someday win it again.

Instead, I think the McNabb-led Eagles will over the years become very fond of that most useful little word "IF".
258 posted on 01/18/2004 7:47:57 AM PST by Tricorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: Libertarian4Bush
What was your "sound assessment" from section 236 at the Linc yesterday?
259 posted on 01/19/2004 6:28:16 AM PST by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: PBRSTREETGANG
What was your "sound assessment" from section 236 at the Linc yesterday?

well, a few things...

(1) way too much is being made of the McNabb injury. yes, it was a cheap shot, but even if a flag had been thrown, or even if it didn't happen altogether, the Eagles didn't give themselves a chance to win for the following reasons...

(2) the wideouts either need to be more physical, or get replaced with wideouts who are willing to be. the first pick was a result of pinkston running the wrong route, so he wasn't in position to prevent the INT, but on the Thrash play, you've gotta hang onto that ball, and on the sideline Thrash play, he's gotta turn his head around and look for that ball.

(3) the offensive line played abysmally. williams, thomas, and fraley got their lunches handed to them, especially on that textbook stunt the panthers run so well.

(4) brian dawkins needs to play like a big-time player in big-time games. the delhomme TD pass was in the air far too long for him not to make a play on it. period.

(5) andy reid never got over his grudge with duce staley. correll buckhalter just didn't bring much to the table yesterday. yes, the eagles missed westbrook, but if they can get by the packers without him, they should have gotten by the panthers. staley was the most motivated individual player on the field, and with the expection of one early drop, he was playing like it. if someone's hungry, feed them.

(6) with the exception of four or five tackling breakdowns (you'd think simoneau only has one arm by the way he played yesterday, the eagles' defense played their style of game - i.e. give up yards, but not a lot of points. they played well enough to win that game, limiting the panthers to 14 points (on a day when the offense committed 4 turnovers).

(7) the coaches don't get a pass overall, however, I felt the playcalling was marginally better than last year's NFC title game. I counted eight flat-out DROPS from my vantage point, and when offensive guard bobby williams has as many catches as the two starting wideouts COMBINED, that's not going to get you to the superbowl. the plays were called, but the players didn't make plays. it's great that todd pinkston has nice hands, but he's gotta be able to catch footballs that hit him in other body parts. rumor has it he called his barbershop today for a cut and they told him not to come in. kind of silly to let ANYONE hear his head with a pair of scissors today, if you ask me.

(8) koy detmer played a gutsy game. while he looked like a deer in the headlights on TV, we've gotta consider the situation he was thrust into.

even if the birds had somehow pulled that one out, there's no way they could have beaten new england with that kind of performance.

(9) brandon whiting needs to be more of a force at defensive end. with a lot of action coming his way, for him to make just one tackle and get no pressure on an immobile QB is unacceptable.

(10) speaking of unacceptable, todd pinkston's post-game comments would be enough to have me screaming for him to be cut if the signing bonus wouldn't impact the salary cap.

(11) if any long-tem silver lining can come out of this, it was nice to see McNabb finally holding people accountable and getting in their faces for not doing their job. being a nice guy is great, but it's time he took people to the woodshed when they screw up. unfortunately, it was too little, too late.

so now that the season has ended for the big mean black quarterback who was too much of a man to take rush limbaugh's bait, the racists among us can get back to having brett make them sweat.

the above was off-the-cuff, and I may have missed a few things. in fact, coming to mind now is the special teams of the panthers, who played an excellent game with the one exception of kickoff coverage. but I think I got most of my main thoughts down.

260 posted on 01/19/2004 9:14:13 AM PST by Libertarian4Bush (may contain traces of peanuts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-262 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson