Article from a March issue of
The New York Times suggested that volcanism killed the dinosaurs.
1 posted on
11/04/2003 7:12:36 AM PST by
presidio9
To: presidio9
And all these years, I thought it was SUVs.
To: farmfriend
ping
4 posted on
11/04/2003 7:35:49 AM PST by
Thud
To: presidio9; Victoria Delsoul; PatrickHenry; Quila; Rudder; donh; VadeRetro; RadioAstronomer; ...
6 posted on
11/04/2003 7:45:49 AM PST by
Sabertooth
(No Drivers' Licences for Illegal Aliens. Petition SB60. http://www.saveourlicense.com/n_home.htm)
To: presidio9
I see. And the unicorn and jabberwocky went extinct because...?
7 posted on
11/04/2003 7:58:46 AM PST by
pabianice
To: presidio9
YEC INTREP
To: presidio9
THis article is not true, In fact it was the opposite that occured, Lower levels of Oxygen killed off the Dinosaurs
Last gasp for the dinosaurs
Gary Landis, of the US Geological Survey, measured oxygen in microscopic air bubbles trapped in amber, a fossilised tree resin. He found that the amount of oxygen dropped from 35 per cent 2 million years before the end of the Cretaceous period, to 28 per cent just after the end of the Cretaceous - the time when the dinosaurs all but disappeared. Today, the oxygen level is at 21 per cent...
Most scientists agree the impact of an asteroid or meteor was the catalyst.
Not true either, Dumb Reporters think it sounds counds cool so they report it as such but most scientist do not, The only ones that claim to believe in the silly Asteroid Hypothesis just want a free trip to Cancun
10 posted on
11/04/2003 9:24:52 AM PST by
qam1
(Don't Patikify New Jersey)
To: PatrickHenry
A lot of food for your ping list
11 posted on
11/04/2003 9:25:07 AM PST by
AdmSmith
To: presidio9
I think Dinosaurs were soil factories.
What better way to build up top soil than these huge creatures that could eat the tops of trees?
17 posted on
11/04/2003 10:12:18 AM PST by
DannyTN
(Note left on my door by a pack of neighborhood dogs.)
To: presidio9
One thing that is misleading in the article is the conflation of absolute oxygen pressure with partial pressure. At 14000 feet today (or 4593.1785 metres for the Europeans), the total pressure is quite low compared to sea level but the oxygen-nitrogen ratio is nearly the same. A low partial pressure of oxygen at sea level doesn't imply high-altitude conditions.
22 posted on
11/04/2003 11:13:47 AM PST by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: presidio9
There's something to be said for theories that start out with some physical evidence. It helps direct the inquiry and gets rid of a lot of silliness up front.
52 posted on
11/04/2003 6:44:16 PM PST by
gcruse
(http://gcruse.typepad.com/)
To: presidio9
"I don't know of any brontosaurus that could fly"All that would be needed is a tall cliff and a running start.
72 posted on
11/05/2003 10:54:58 PM PST by
Redcloak
(Is this thing on?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson