Posted on 02/26/2026 1:16:36 PM PST by DFG
The people who want to indoctrinate your children in public schools and libraries would like you to know that the LGBT propaganda they want to lay on them isn’t appropriate for adult settings.
During a hearing in the Minnesota Senate which ended up going viral for all the wrong reasons, a Democrat called a Republican member out for reading from a book he said was in the teen section and recommended for kids as young as 12.
The reason? It wasn’t appropriate for state lawmakers, obviously.
The viral footage was taken from a hearing of the Education Finance Committee of the Minnesota Senate, where librarians were testifying on Wednesday about the library ecosystem in the state.
That included a book available in several libraries brought in by Minnesota State Sen. Michael Holmstrom called “This Book Is Gay.” This book is recommended for kids as young as 12, he said, including at some of the public libraries run by several of the people who had testified during the hearing.
“This book, among other things, it recommends to young children how to flirt in gay bars, it recommends to children how to enter into non-consensual sexual relationships,” Holmstrom said, before reading from an especially graphic section of the book.
(Excerpt) Read more at westernjournal.com ...
The phrase, often quoted as “We will take America without firing a shot...
Former Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev
Democrats wink and nod
The democrats were not upset it was being read, they were upset it was being exposed.
Democrats using psyops to hide their crimes
I am in the Arizona State Senate. It happened on Tuesday here as well. A GOP Senator read from a school library book that was just xxx. The dems called uncle, which is just what we wanted. Can’t read it here, should not be in a school library.. It was pretty damn dirty.
Keep representing!
Someone should introduce a bill that bans public schools from exposing prepubescent children from ALL sexual content and material. Then we’ll see who votes against it and know who the Jeffrey Epsteins in Congress.
The only thing that they reject to is the information becoming public. Evil loves darkness and shadows and dies in the light.
Agree
He was ranting about how there was no real legal definition of "obscenity" and so to label a book obscene was just because parents did not want to let their children know about sex because they did not want to let them grow up.
I let him go on for a bit and, when he had wound down, asked him about non-sexual obscene books. He blinked at me when I said that the most obscene book I knew of that should never be read to a child contained no sex at all. Not even obliquely.
Finally curiosity got the better of him and he asked what book I was talking about and I said it was "the Rainbow Fish" because it told children that if someone was beautiful or talented in any way the right thing to do was punish them until they let you tear them apart and wear a bit of their talent or beauty as a trophy that you had destroyed something lovely. And they did this through a bunch of very pretty pictures which made it even more horrible.
He looked a bit like a fish himself when I said that.
Why am I telling people about this?
Because there are more books other there that should not be available to children then the ones about sex.
We have to start reading and THINKING about what lessons are being taught though story because that is how humans, especially human children, learn.
I think 12 ga groin shots to gender transform these leftists may become popular.
Get the porn out of schools.
Child grooming librarians
I an old guy invited a bunch of preteens into his house and read that filth to them he would be arrested and charged. Why can teachers get away with this evil crap? Where are the police? What cowards.
Exactly, but they virtue signal by pretending they have some moral objections to what they’re foisting on the kids.
Why can’t we put stuff like this out of busines?
Why can’t we put stuff like this out of busines?
I noticed the Gates foundation gave 75k to a local library out here in the sticks of Ohio. I have often wondered if there isn’t some “strange” books in the kiddie section. Check these foundation grants for your own state and counties.
Related? Several years of disappearing women.
https://sciotovalleyguardian.com/2026/02/03/why-does-the-ross-county-sheriffs-office-appear-in-the-epstein-files/
https://sciotovalleyguardian.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/EFTA00172826.pdf
The article “Why does the Ross County Sheriff’s Office appear in the Epstein Files?” provides an objective evaluation of a federal document (EFTA00172826) that connects Jeffrey Epstein to local Ohio law enforcement agencies.
Accuracy and Contextual Clarity
The article accurately identifies the source document as a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request filed in 2020 by forensic analyst Angela Clemente. It clarifies that the document’s existence does not imply that Epstein operated in Ross County or that local officials were his associates. Instead, it explains that the file is a “meta-document” used to argue for better oversight of federal informant practices.
Key Findings from the Article
The Connection to Epstein: The article explains that the link is thematic rather than criminal. Clemente used Epstein’s status as a “protected informant” as a comparison to argue that similar informant-handling failures may have occurred in Ohio.
Local Implications: It correctly notes that the Ross County Sheriff’s Office and Chillicothe Police Department are mentioned because of a formal complaint regarding the handling of missing and murdered women cases in southern Ohio.
Specific Allegations: The article lists the allegations found in the document, including the misuse of federal overtime funds, conflicts of interest, and investigative lapses within a local task force.
Victim Link: It references a passage in the document where an Epstein victim claimed to have been assaulted at an associate’s home in Ohio, though no specific location or defendant is identified.
Tone and Journalistic Integrity
The article maintains a responsible tone by proactively debunking potential sensationalism. It explicitly states:
The document does not accuse Ross County law enforcement of involvement with Epstein’s crimes.
The allegations within the document have not been substantiated or adjudicated in court.
Conclusion
The article serves as a clarifying resource for the local community, explaining that the appearance of their law enforcement agencies in the “Epstein Files” is due to a third-party analyst’s attempt to highlight systemic issues in informant oversight rather than a direct criminal connection to Epstein himself.
Nice AI job... “The allegations within the document have not been substantiated or adjudicated in court.” That says it all.
And then there is the story of Ohio’s richest man Les Wexner...
https://www.nbc4i.com/news/local-news/columbus/after-being-named-a-co-conspirator-epstein-files-show-les-wexners-role-in-investigation/
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.