Posted on 08/31/2025 9:59:20 AM PDT by John Semmens
Secretary of Health & Human Services (HHS) Robert F Kennedy's decision to revise the Center for Disease Control (CDC) regulations for the covid vaccine so rankled CDC Director Susan Monarez and her staff that they publicly criticized his decision. Monarez contends that "the successful launch of the mRNA vaccines during the pandemic saved millions of lives. The Secretary's decision to take these vaccines off the list of inoculations that children must receive to enter schools is unwarranted."
Kennedy pointed out that "these vaccines bypassed the normal drug approval process. They were never properly tested for safety or effectiveness prior to being injected into billions of individuals worldwide. Subsequently, it has been shown that these vaccines neither prevented getting infected nor transmitting the disease to others. Youngsters were not benefited by these vaccines. On the contrary, significant harm was inflicted on many of those vaccinated. My decision to remove these drugs from the required vaccination list is fully warranted."
"Director Monarez and her staff's objections are not supported by science," Kennedy continued. "My decision to leave the choice of whether to get these shots to the patients and their doctors is a modest step toward reform. Adults who want to take these experimental drugs or have them injected into their children may do so, but no one will be coerced into taking them. Ms. Monarez's claim that my decision to fire her was politically motivated is without merit."
Dr. Sherri Tenpenny hailed Kennedy's decision, calling it "sensible and overdue. The rush to turn billions of individuals into unwitting guinea pigs for an inadequately tested experimental drug is indefensible. We need to look at DNA contamination, poor manufacturing standards, cardiovascular complaints, turbo-cancers, long-term disability and complications with the immune system that seem to be undesired side effects of these vaccines. The immunity from liability for any harm these vaccines might do that the pharmaceutical industry demanded and got from the government is a giant red flag that should have stopped the widespread distribution of these drugs. We can't undo the failures of the past, but we can stop repeating them."
Monarez countered that "both Kennedy and Tenpenny are vaccine skeptics who are undermining faith in the medical authorities that common folks should be listening to. The experts in pharmaceuticals know what they're doing. The doctors who dispense vaccines fully trust these products. The previous Secretary of HHS fully supported President Biden's effort to make the covid vaccines universally mandatory. Going against this consensus is dangerous heresy."
![]() |
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
BigPharm pushes the trans crappola ‘cause the life-long maintenance drugs are a reliable $$ flow — until the 40% suicide rate catches up. In parallel, they need another life long revenue flow — vaxes.
My objection is two-fold:
1. if experimental (aka, not tested) then it is a voluntary choice. Mandating that is a reason to overthrow a government and roll out the guillotines for everyone involved.
2. no vax is worthwhile to society if it does not stop the spread. Vaccines used to be defined with this capability until BigPharm bribed CDC officials to trim the definition so that the needs of society are no longer addressed.
My concerns are with the mRNA vaccines and with the amount of vaccines given to children under two. I am not against vaccines in general, and I think that they should be a continued part of our society. I disagree with the mega-vaxxers on one side of me and with the anti-vaxxers on the other. (And I will throw water balloons at each group.)
The Covid vaxes killed more people than they saved from dying...The NNTV (Number Needed to Vaccinate) for the Pfizer (data provided by Pfizer) vax is 130 (130 people needed to be vaxed to prevent 1 infection), the other vaxes are about the same...if you run the math it comes out the vax was more likely to kill you than save you from dying.
I am not against vaccines in general...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Well, I’m against anything that has been misrepresented so that somebody can try to convince me that it’s ok to inject it into my arm... an experimental gene therapy was not a vaccine until the definition of what a vaccine is was changed to fit the mRNA product. Immunity is not the same as immune response...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.