Posted on 08/25/2025 6:59:32 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
The student debt crisis isn’t a natural market phenomenon; it’s the predictable result of decades of government interference. Since 1980, average tuition and fees have increased by 1,200 percent, while consumer price inflation has risen only 236 percent over the same period. This massive increase has left students and families struggling to keep up, often forcing them to take on substantial debt just to attend college. Today, over 42.7 million Americans owe a combined $1.69 trillion in federal student loan debt. A combination of federal policies, including subsidized loans, government grants, bloated university budgets, and a complete lack of accountability, has fueled the relentless rise in tuition costs. As a result, higher education—once seen as a path to opportunity—has become a debt trap for millions.
In 1978, Congress passed the Middle Income Student Assistance Act, making federally-subsidized loans available to nearly all students, not just those with low incomes. It took two years to fully roll out loans to the newly-eligible student population. Once 1980 began, tuition rates started their steady climb. Making student loans available to more people seems like a benign policy on its face, but it sent tuition prices soaring for decades.
Universities serve one of the poorest age/education demographics in the United States: young adults without a college degree. Since their target market was short on cash, universities had to be sensitive to tuition prices; otherwise, students couldn’t afford to attend. Before 1980, students had to work during college to pay as they went or work after high school to save as much as possible before enrolling. Once subsidized loans became available, students could borrow the full cost of college with the expectation of higher post-graduation earnings and easy debt repayment. Never mind the taxpayer picking up part of the interest expense. College administrators quickly realized that since students didn’t have to pay up front in cash anymore, price sensitivity was no longer a limiting factor. Universities could raise prices and pursue pet projects like social change, costly sports programs, bloated staffing, and luxurious amenities.
A study by the New York Federal Reserve found that for every dollar the maximum loan limit increased, average tuition rose by 60 cents. This astonishing pass-through rate makes raising subsidized loan caps completely ludicrous. Originally, only the poorest students needed subsidized loans. But as more loans originated, tuition spiraled out of control, requiring more students to borrow until we reached today’s crisis of unaffordable tuition.
The vicious cycle is obvious. So why not stop raising the loan maximums? Because higher education is a $200+ billion industry. Even in the public university system, an entrenched bureaucracy is getting wealthy off high tuition. The corrupt cycle looks like this: university administrators and faculty unions donate to left-wing super PACs. In return, they ask for increased student loan limits and more federal grants under the banner of increasing “affordability” for students. Universities then raise tuition and funnel the new money into raises, administrative expansion, and campus construction projects. Then, faculty members continue indoctrinating students to vote for far-left candidates, and the racket continues.
A Forbes article stated the following:
Between 1976 and 2018, full-time administrators and other professionals employed by those institutions increased by 164% and 452%, respectively. Meanwhile, the number of full-time faculty employed at colleges and universities in the U.S. increased by only 92%, marginally outpacing student enrollment which grew by 78%.
University administrators are not using the increased tuition revenue to create smaller class sizes or improve student’s education. They are inflating the bureaucracy to create a colossal social justice organization.
Graduation now depends on ideological coursework; every student in the California State University system’s 23 campuses must take a class in ethnic studies or social justice. The point is twofold: indoctrinate students in radical leftist ideology and create education jobs for graduates with useless degrees like San Francisco State’s Social Justice Education program. It’s a pyramid scheme designed to enrich the academic elite and cement progressive dogma in the young professional class.
Universities are so effective at converting students into activists that the education system can’t even afford to employ them all. We have begun to see the private sector’s culture shift to placate the radical employees coming out of colleges. So many young adults have fallen under the spell of left-wing cultural ideology that an entirely new industry has appeared out of thin air. “Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion” training and consulting is now a $15 billion industry. Firms now feel obligated to create mandatory training programs under pressure from young employees. These consulting fees are nothing but tributes to activists in exchange for a “Get-Out-Of-Jail-Free” card in case an employee says something in public contrary to leftist social doctrine. While universities have succeeded at getting rich by indoctrinating students and poisoning our culture, they’ve also buried an entire generation in debt.
The same collectivists who built this broken system now insist on fixing it—by expanding it. As Bernie Sanders described in a recent interview with Joe Rogan, the solution to a $500,000 medical degree is more subsidies. He sees public colleges gouging students with government-backed aid and calls for even more intervention. He lacks the self-awareness to see that his ideology created this crisis. His support for ever-growing bureaucracy and government control led to a $1.69 trillion student debt bomb, with 42.7 million borrowers. Now he’s adamant that this enormous financial burden be shifted onto taxpayers. US higher education is a prime example of how collectivists take control of a system, corrupt it, and then raid taxpayer coffers to cover the damage. All the while, they accuse small-government advocates of being heartless and blame them for the very crisis the collectivists created.
Lost in this conversation is the taxpayer, who’s also getting shafted. State governments continue to fund bloated universities because even federally-subsidized tuition isn’t enough to pay for the massive bureaucracy. Meanwhile, taxpayers are forced to cover the interest on ballooning student debt. Americans who couldn’t afford college and chose to work, are now paying taxes to subsidize the degrees of their higher-earning peers. This collectivist pyramid scheme is a naked power grab designed only to expand the education system, enrich insiders, and reward those who continue to partake in the scheme.
![]() |
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
What a hustle this has become. This is right up there with the "Property tax" con job.
Rent of Primary Residence in U.S. City Average
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CUUR0000SEHA
It’s up about five-fold 1980 to the present time.
Rents stem from a mixture of building cost and rental & maintenance people cost.
Banks were smeared as “predatory lenders” during the housing crisis. I said “what about ‘predatory educators’”?
Perhaps college students should have to pay $10,000 tuition from their own funds at least seven months previously before becoming eligible for federal student loans.
Prospective college students would then typically work a year before going off to college.
They could take remedial courses online during their off-work hours. Their SAT scores would become higher, and their chance of graduating would increase.
My grandson is in his final year. His student loans started at 7.35% and has gone up every year with no explanation except some factors have changed. This year it was 18.50%. I loaned him the money for his last two semesters.
“The average student loan debt for a master’s degree is approximately $64,950, with total debt including undergraduate loans reaching around $83,651.”
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=average+student+loan+debt+for+masters+degree&ia=web
Maybe federal loans should only be available for medical school and students without a bachelor’s degree.
Was he borrowing from the Soprano Student Loan Company?
p
Pretty sure these student loan interest rates are not simple fixed rate/term loans. The interest compounds daily? In other words, the students pay and pay and pay and the principle never goes down. We found that out on a Parent Plus loan. Was paying more than required but principle owed never moved.
Circa 1966 my university had about 7000 students. The administration was one wing of the chemistry building. That was 1/4 of the chemistry building consisting of about 20 offices. Today the administration building is a 3 story building of about 3 times the size of the whole chemistry building of 1966 but serving but about 8500 students.
I see a problem with this.
I thought usury was illegal.
The student loan system turns young people into indentured servants. This is not a good thing. It also creates a huge Leftist education bureaucracy which is also not a good thing.
In NY, Princess Kathy has pontificated that we now have FREE Community College for “demand occupations.” NOTHING IS FREE! When will people wake up? When this country is $100 Trillion in debt? The real question is, in debt to whom?
The student loan system turns young people into indentured servants. This is not a good thing.
~~~~~
If you don’t want to pay the money back then don’t borrow it.
Make the loan system guaranteed by the schools. get the fed out of it. Defaults then are paid for by the schools themselves. Curriculum will change in weeks. No more doctorates in “Bikini inspection”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.