Posted on 06/07/2025 9:36:42 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
As we have watched things unfold, we have noticed that Tulsi Gabbard and Marco Rubio seem to be the most effective at delivering results despite the efforts of the entrenched control mechanisms of the deep state intelligence community. Actions speak louder than words, and while the words of many are strong, it is the actions of Gabbard and Rubio that show focus.
Previously Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard removed the National Intelligence Council from the CIA and removed the heads. In the latest development, the intelligence apparatus is in a state of apoplexy because DNI Gabbard has experienced the politicization of the Intelligence Community Inspector General’s network (ICIG), and she is now taking bold actions around the silo control mechanism.
Before getting to the substance, it is worth reminding everyone of clear politicization within the ICIG when Michael Atkinson changed the CIA whistleblower rules in order to facilitate a false accusation against President Trump using CIA operative Eric Ciaramella and Alexander Vindman. Atkinson worked with his former boss in the DOJ, Mary McCord, to frame the construct of an impeachment against President Trump.
Also remember, Atkinson’s testimony to the House impeachment committee was sealed and classified by co-chairs Adam Schiff and Jerry Nadler who were part of the framing. That transcript has NEVER been released.
In the latest development, DNI Tulsi Gabbard has installed a key ally, Dennis Kirk, into the ICIG apparatus. Kirk is in place to monitor the political operations of the Intelligence Community and report to DNI Gabbard so that she can eliminate the bad actors. To say the Deep State IC embeds are apoplectic would be an understatement. The Inspector General system within the Intelligence Community is a critical control mechanism for politicization of intelligence.
The leaks to the media are to the Washington Post, because this core part of the IC is a CIA element. The CIA uses the Washington Post as their public relations and narrative distribution network.
WASHINGTON POST – Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard installed one of her top advisers to a position within the office of the inspector general of the intelligence community, according to two U.S. officials familiar with the matter. The move potentially compromises the integrity of the independent watchdog office while it is investigating the use of the Signal messaging app by top government officials to discuss classified details of a pending U.S. military strike against the Houthis in March.
The adviser, Dennis Kirk, was placed within the watchdog office on May 9, but reports to the DNI, according to one of the officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the matter’s sensitivity.
Rep. Stephen F. Lynch (D-Massachusetts), the leading Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, sent a letter to acting intelligence community inspector general Tamara A. Johnson on Thursday, demanding information about the appointment of Kirk, who was an adviser in the Office of Personnel Management during President Donald Trump’s first term and co-author of a Project 2025 chapter on the federal workforce.
Lynch said the Oversight Committee was informed of the appointment by the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency (CIGIE), a group made up of government watchdogs.
In a statement to The Washington Post, Gabbard’s press secretary, Olivia Coleman, accused the intelligence community inspector general of failing to fulfill “the responsibility to be an independent organization unbeholden to partisan interests.”
Coleman said that Kirk was assigned to the watchdog office as part of the transition team and found “evidence of overwhelming and intentional politicization by the current IC IG team.”
The office’s leadership, she said, has “bucked President Trump’s directives” regarding diversity, equity and inclusion, “slow-walked responses to Congressional Republicans while prioritizing responding to Democrats, abused taxpayer dollars for personal purposes, and created a workplace environment filled with politically motivated action,” she said. “This is unacceptable on all fronts, and the DNI is taking action to ensure the IG office is focused on fulfilling its mission.”
[…] “The purported appointment of the IC IG ‘senior adviser’ heightens existing concerns about politicization and improper conduct at ODNI, including the subordination of competence and accountability at the agency to political fealty to President Trump,” Lynch wrote.
[…] The intelligence community inspector general was set up by statute in 2010 to provide independent oversight over the now 18 agencies in the intelligence community. (read more)
Pay attention to when the ICIG office was constructed, 2010!
Barack Obama took office in January 2009, with the House and Senate fully controlled by Democrats (60 Senators) throughout 2009 and 2010. The establishment of the ICIG was part of the construct for the Fourth Branch of Govt.
Current DNI Tulsi Gabbard is working through a process to deal with the IC weaponization legacy we have discussed on these pages for quite some time. Again, one of the few cabinet officials actually confronting the constructs within the Deep State.
Keep watching.
This battle between the MAGA forces and the entrenched deep state will get more intense and ugly. The deep state parasites and traitors are fighting for their lives and a system that has deceived and stole from the American people for decades. This will go on for a long time, like fighting cancer and then some. There is no compromise with this ilk, it’s a fight to the death. Period.
Silo “rules” are just customs of the filthy intelligence community in America. She is there to do precisely what she is doing and un-silo that filthy un-American nest of vipers.
Well-stated, and absolutely true.
First, it is impossible to name Ciaramella and Vindman as the whistleblowers because Mr Shif has forbidden those names to be uttered. And you know what power Shif has.
Also, why are there 18, EIGHTEEN intelligence agencies?
Great work by Tulsi.
Most of these agencies are actually part of DIA but focused on service expertise and concerns e.g. army, navy, mc, AF. Space Force. There is also customs and CG. DOE as a part because it does non-proliferation, treaty monitoring and nuclear capabilities assessments for which it has unique scientific capabilities. Then there is CIA and NSA.
DNI was created to unsilo the silos. That’s Tulsi’s job.
Really important piece. Thanks for the post.
Trump is a lot smarter than he lets on.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XwBMKwt14IU&pp=ygUcVHVja2VyIGNhcmxzb24gam9obiBraXJpYWtvdQ%3D%3D
This piece by tucker talks about the dirty deep state and is very interesting
Ties in with this thread
I could be wrong, but I think you misspelled “Shif’s” name.
It a “t” not “f”
Or maybe I mixed up his name with what he is . . .
Selecting for Director of DNI a patriot, a former Democrat, who has been targeted by the Democrat Deep State, was brilliant.
In a sane world, when the Senate Majority Leader said this:
“Let me tell you, you take on the intelligence community, they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you,” Schumer told MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow.”
the whole world should have stopped. He admitted, in public, that the intelligence community runs the government, but it just didn’t seem to matter. Things just continued as normal.
the whole world should have stopped. He admitted, in public, that the intelligence community runs the government, but it just didn’t seem to matter. Things just continued as normal.
I agree with you, and I believe it is one of the reasons for Trump’s win. It validated what many suspected.
They aren’t fighting for their lives. They are just fighting to undermine the Constitution for their own selfish illegal agendas and power they have because they crossed the line from being lawful public servants to abusers of the system.
They might be if found guilty of sedition or treason.
Sorry, I don’t have over two hours without a synopsis.
Check
“he did it on an open mike by mistake.”
I thought that when he said it he was speaking directly into a mic which he clearly knew was open. It was during an MSNBC interview, IIRC.
He never tried to hide it. It was s clear threat.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.