Deputy AG Todd Blanche Responds to Boasberg Order…

The Conservative Treehouse - The Last Refuge ^ | March 21, 2025 | Sundance

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Judge Boasberg said: “By March 21, 2025, at 10:00 a.m., Defendants shall submit a sworn declaration by a person with direct involvement in the Cabinet-level discussions regarding invocation of the state-secrets privilege;” (link)

Deputy AG Todd Blanche responds:

[SOURCE]

Boasberg gets the legal equivalent of “yup” from Blanche.

Funny.

.

Keep in mind, this is the way the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals framed the issue of “national security” invocation by the Jack Smith probe.

[pdf SOURCE HERE – BACKGROUND HERE]

[E. Pluribus Unum]

A little taste of their own medicine never hurt anybody.

[mass55th]

None of this would be necessary if Justice Roberts would invoke the 1948 Supreme Court decision on The Alien Enemy Act in Ludecke v. Watkins, 335 U.S. 160. The Act precludes judicial review.

[Obadiah]

It seems clear that Roberts is now solidly in the liberal camp. Another Justice Souter.

[Bookshelf]

Roberts is a coward. And a coward is never to be trusted.

[NoLibZone]

Or Amy Barrett.

[Smellin Salt]

Yes, sir, he’s a scaly swamp inhabiting creature that has gotten by all these years. I remember a couple of years ago when he said there are no liberal judges and no conservative judges, there are just judges.

[maddog55]

Why does Roberts need to invoke anything if it’s already in existence and has been previously used.

The judiciary has no right to review period. It’s law.

[Leaning Right]

I suggest that the Trump administration download and save the image below. Then send it as the response to every liberal judge’s “order”.

[C210N]

“Yup” is equivalent to “buh”, in Simpsoneeze

[_longranger81]

Hoist on her own petard.
-Blown up by her own grenade, OR —by her own fart.

[WASCWatch]

That’s a very short ‘FU’ to the Judge.

[ssfromla]

Roberts is a puppet who does what his puppeteers want him to do at any given moment.

Yeah Roberts, I will tell everyone about you. You think you're smart but you're ignorant. You've put yourself in a situation that won't end well for you.

[DiogenesLamp]

Yes, sir, he’s a scaly swamp inhabiting creature that has gotten by all these years. I remember a couple of years ago when he said there are no liberal judges and no conservative judges, there are just judges.

What that tells me is that he is either a liar or an idiot.

[sauropod]

Bkmk

[hal ogen]

Those 2 things are not mutually exclusive exclusive.

[Alas Babylon!]

I remember a couple of years ago when he said there are no liberal judges and no conservative judges, there are just judges.

Did Roberts see Chuck U Schumer on PBS today?

Chuck Schumer: Yes. Our democracy is at risk because Donald Trump shows that he wishes to violate the laws in many, many different ways. The good news here is, we did put 235 judges—progressive judges, judges not under the control of Trump—last year on the bench, and they are ruling against Trump time after time after time.

Roberts won't address this, will he?

[Gigantor]

Saved

[mass55th]

"Why does Roberts need to invoke anything if it’s already in existence and has been previously used."

Because this Supreme Court conveniently ignores decisions made by other sitting Supreme Court justices.

[FlingWingFlyer]

Oh, I wish I were in the land of cotton,
Old times there are not forgotten,
Look away, look away, look away to Dixie land.

[Smellin Salt]

No sir he won’t.