Posted on 11/08/2024 3:55:22 PM PST by Diana in Wisconsin
No matter how bad you think Covid policies were, they were intended to be worse.
Consider the vaccine passports alone. Six cities were locked down to include only the vaccinated in public indoor places. They were New York City, Boston, Chicago, New Orleans, Washington, D.C., and Seattle. The plan was to enforce this with a vaccine passport. It broke. Once the news leaked that the shot didn’t stop infection or transmission, the planners lost public support and the scheme collapsed.
It was undoubtedly planned to be permanent and nationwide if not worldwide. Instead, the scheme had to be dialed back.
Features of the CDC’s edicts did incredible damage. It imposed the rent moratorium. It decreed the ridiculous “six feet of distance” and mask mandates. It forced Plexiglas as the interface for commercial transactions. It implied that mail-in balloting must be the norm, which probably flipped the election. It delayed the reopening as long as possible. It was sadistic.
Even with all that, worse was planned. On July 26, 2020, with the George Floyd riots having finally settled down, the CDC issued a plan for establishing nationwide quarantine camps. People were to be isolated, given only food and some cleaning supplies. They would be banned from participating in any religious services. The plan included contingencies for preventing suicide. There were no provisions made for any legal appeals or even the right to legal counsel.
The plan’s authors were unnamed but included 26 footnotes. It was completely official. The document was only removed on about March 26, 2023. During the entire intervening time, the plan survived on the CDC’s public site with little to no public notice or controversy.
It was called “Interim Operational Considerations for Implementing the Shielding Approach to Prevent COVID-19 Infections in Humanitarian Settings.”
“This document presents considerations from the perspective of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) for implementing the shielding approach in humanitarian settings as outlined in guidance documents focused on camps, displaced populations and low-resource settings. This approach has never been documented and has raised questions and concerns among humanitarian partners who support response activities in these settings. The purpose of this document is to highlight potential implementation challenges of the shielding approach from CDC’s perspective and guide thinking around implementation in the absence of empirical data. Considerations are based on current evidence known about the transmission and severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and may need to be revised as more information becomes available.”
By absence of empirical data, the meaning is: nothing like this has ever been tried. The point of the document was to map out how it could be possible and alert authorities to possible pitfalls to be avoided.
The meaning of “shielding” is “to reduce the number of severe Covid-19 cases by limiting contact between individuals at higher risk of developing severe disease (‘high-risk’) and the general population (‘low-risk’). High-risk individuals would be temporarily relocated to safe or ‘green zones’ established at the household, neighborhood, camp/sector, or community level depending on the context and setting. They would have minimal contact with family members and other low-risk residents.”
In other words, this is what used to be concentration camps.
Who are these people who would be rounded up? They are “older adults and people of any age who have serious underlying medical conditions.” Who determines this? Public health authorities. The purpose? The CDC explains: “physically separating high-risk individuals from the general population” allows authorities “to prioritize the use of the limited available resources.”
This sounds a lot like condemning people to death in the name of protecting them.
The model establishes three levels. First is the household level. Here high-risk people are“physically isolated from other household members.” That alone is objectionable. Elders need people to take care of them. They need love and to be surrounded by family. The CDC should never imagine that it would intervene in households to force old people into separate places.
The model jumps from households to the “neighborhood level.” Here we have the same approach: forced separation of those deemed vulnerable.
From there, the model jumps again to the “camp/sector level.” Here it is different. “A group of shelters such as schools, community buildings within a camp/sector (max 50 high-risk individuals per single green zone) where high-risk individuals are physically isolated together. One entry point is used for exchange of food, supplies, etc. A meeting area is used for residents and visitors to interact while practicing physical distancing (2 meters). No movement into or outside the green zone.”
Continues at link...
Ping Worthy?
We should lock them all up.
a fate far worse far than death for this patriot. thank God for FR, because me and mine learned enough fast enough to refuse the jab.
CDC needs quarantining FOREVER
I’m glad you could!
My Dad was dying of cancer during CovidBS-19. I did EVERYTHING they asked of me so I could be with him in his final days. Took the 2-step jab at the VA, consented to health checks and temperature readings at his Nursing Facility. And they STILL would NOT let me be with him!
Last day I saw him alive was March 12, 2020. He died May 31, 2020.
I’ve loathed Mother Government for a very long time. This was the cherry on top. :(
The author remarks, regarding the contemplated “camps”:
“This sounds a lot like condemning people to death in the name of protecting them.”
That’s exactly what it sounds like, and exactly the cruel and perverse motivation of many nameless faceless “healthcare” functionaries.
They need to be identified.
Evidently the CDC was trying to copy Australia which actually did place citizens in Covid Concentration Camps.
So, so very sorry for you, Diana. 😔
A heartless cruelty was done to you, and to your father and family.
I am praying for you. Asking that you be granted the ability to endure, and to forgive.
Yep. I remember that. Such a beautiful country. My Dad was able to visit Australia and New Zealand twice...when they were still FREE COUNTRIES.
None of that is going to happen with Trump in Charge. Just forget about it. So many good things are happening already that I can’t believe it. I was listening to the radio and Lars Larsen went through the list of things Trump has accomplished before he is even in office.
Thank you! I’ve forgiven them - the staff at Dad’s Care Facility were top notch and were just following orders. (I’m a Vet - we do that - right or wrong.)
I ALWAYS forgive. However...I NEVER forget. ;)
Indict Fauci as soon as possible.
i’m sorry. we home schooled to protect our kids and fought my wife’s employer with a religious exemption signed by our pastor. i’m self employed now. we then went to frontline doctors and stocked up on meds through them and through other sources for the wuflu. it all worked thank God.
you should sue the * out of them.
Oh, I am totally looking forward to the MAGA days ahead! There’s no bigger MAGA MAMA than me! :)
oh and i took my 94 year old mom in and self-treated and hid her from from big med.
Excellent! :)
Here’s a question: would those designated as ‘high risk’ also be considered ‘high risk’ based on political leanings or race?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.