House Task Force Obtains “Gruesome Autopsy” of Trump Rally Shooter Thomas Crooks

The Gateway Pundit ^ | September 10, 2024 | Anthony Scott

[Macho MAGA Man]

Representative Mike Kelly (R-PA), who is the leader of the House task force in charge of investigating the assassination attempt on President Trump, has revealed the autopsy of Trump rally shooter Thomas Matthew Crooks is “gruesome.”

In a comment to The Daily Mail, Rep. Kelly said that people who “don’t have a strong stomach” shouldn’t see the autopsy.

Punch Bowl News reported the Trump Shooting Task Force obtained the autopsy through a subpoena to the Allegheny County medical examiner.

Also contained in the subpoena was a request for everyone in the room when the autopsy occurred.

[Macho MAGA Man]

This story was posted two days ago. Apologies for not posting it sooner.

[CivilWarBrewing]

So gruesome that Crooks’ body was cremated IMMEDIATELY!

[OakOak]

How can this not be misdirection?

He’s dead, that much we know.

Focusing on the assassin’s body damage seems like a head fake to me.

[Sacajaweau]

That’s his parents right. And it wasn’t immediate.

[Sacajaweau]

It was posted a while back.

[Sacajaweau]

https://www.foxnews.com/us/fbi-fires-back-claims-released-crooks-body-cremation-days-after-trump-assassination-attempt

[marktwain]

Autopsies tend to be gruesome.

[Responsibility2nd]

And the Butler County Coroner was obstructed at every turn by the FBI.

Who as you say cremated the body.

[OakOak]

EXACTLY!

This is not a good sign. We need you folks to focus on the injuries of the deceased as we recorded them.

This just in - he’s dead!

[LouieFisk]

I wouldn’t hold my breath - the Deep State is still holding back information on JFK/Oswald 60 years later.

[skr]

Fatal head shots aren’t usually anything but gruesome.

[LouieFisk]

“Autopsies tend to be gruesome.”
—
Couldn’t be any more gruesome than the results of a typical night in Detroit.

[ZULU]

Yep. Useful idiot primed for the job by the FBI

[griswold3]

Limited Hangout. Time to look behind the curtain

[Sacajaweau]

The body was given to the parents after it was cleared by the FBI. The government doesn’t “own” bodies.

[Responsibility2nd]

There was no “body”. A body could later be exhumed for further and better analysis.

Ashes? Not so much.

[OakOak]

So we’re not hearing, you can trust this Investigation, but rather, look at all that blood over there!

Yeah, sounds like misdirection and bullship

The shooter was given hours on-sight unfettered and then given a clear, open headshot.

[Bonemaker]

Long story short, but when in a college medical type class, spent time in morgue. Observed a very attractive young lady who saw fit to put a 12 gauge shotgun in her mouth and pull the trigger with her toe. Image remains forever,

[TigersEye]

Autopsies tend to be gruesome.

As do rifle shots to the head.

[rx]

I claim evidence manipulation by LE/USSC!

We all have seen the LEO on the roof power-washing the shooter's blood/DNA off the roof, as Rep. Higgins noted "cops would never do that," but there's more.

The FBI showed what was ostensibly the shooter's backpack. The trouble is, what they showed was brand new, teal green, and pristine. What the shooter left on the roof was not so pristine, but black and had at least one aftermarket attachment (a plastic clamp, it would appear):

What would such a clamp have been for, and why didn't the FBI want the public to have available only a false image of the crime scene?

Also, an apparently Photoshopped image of the shooter aiming his rifle on the roof shows him wearing shorts and only a gray T-shirt, which, we've been told was from the Demolition Ranch. Note how, in the aiming photo (mid-below), the T-shirt is curiously-distinct, razor sharp contrast to the rest of the image. Below, in the date-and-time-stamped image, the image seems somewhat edited near the shooter's chin, right shoulder and as it involves the medic's gloved, right forearm. The upper of those three images shows why--I believe--we've been shown Photoshopped images.

Accidentally, LE let a bodycam image slip through that discloses the shooter was not wearing only the T-shirt, but had some kind of shoulder apron, as well. I presume he wore that to hold extra magazines. (I believe it may well have been the plan for him to "hose down" the podium and bleacher area with gales bullets from which many people would not escape alive--least of all PDJT.) If LE would toss such a magazine holder aside to obfuscate the crime scene, would they not as easily remove one or more weapons from where they might "tell an important part of the tale?"

One can quickly and easily understand why such evidence of extra magazines would need to be removed by allegedly complicit law enforcement. In any event, there must be "good" reason for all this Photoshopping.