Posted on 08/28/2024 8:15:57 PM PDT by davikkm
How can we trust someone that will literally say anything to get elected? Voters have come to tolerate a certain level of inconsistency in our politicians, but Kamala Harris is taking things to an entirely new level that we have never seen before. She is disavowing a whole host of far-left positions that she previously deeply believed in, and she is trying to convince all of us that she is now a “moderate” that is deeply in touch with what the American people truly want.
Give me a break.
She doesn’t care about what the American people truly want.
All she cares about is getting elected.
This week, an Axios report that claims Kamala Harris is pledging “to spend hundreds of millions of dollars on the wall along the southern border” has been getting a ton of attention…
If she’s elected president, Kamala Harris pledges to spend hundreds of millions of dollars on the wall along the southern border — a project she once opposed and called “un-American” during the Trump administration.
Anybody that has any common sense realizes that Kamala Harris isn’t interested in spending money on that wall.
In fact, she once called that wall “un-American” and a “medieval vanity project”…
Harris called it Trump’s “medieval vanity project” then and “un-American” in a 2018 social media post. She also posted in 2020 that “Trump’s border wall is a complete waste of taxpayer money and won’t make us any safer.”
But right now immigration is an issue that is really hurting her, and so she needs to look like she wants to do something about it.
(Excerpt) Read more at citizenwatchreport.com ...
Jammie Klammie is flip flopping around like a fish in the bottom of the boat.
No.
Both parties with the exception of about a handful in House & Senate are grifting whores who bankrupted our nation. The collapse is 99% certain now.
Pretty sure Mark Twain might have covered this topic in the 19th century.
2. A voter can only give money to a candidate who they can vote for and can only give money to a party they are a registered member of.
3. Organizations like corporations, unions, PACs, etc. can encourage voters to give money to particular candidates, but they can't collect money; only advertise and advocate.
4. At first there might be no limit to how much a particular voter can give to a particular candidate, but in future there might be some limit so that one very wealthy individual isn't allowed to "buy" a candidate.
Just because corporations, unions, PACs, etc. are "legal persons" doesn't mean they should have the same or more impact on elections than the citizens who actually can vote. These organizations should be limited to advocating for particular candidates via the mail. They should not be allowed to run ad campaigns on TV, Cable, or the internet because this is the current way these organizations outweigh the influence of individual citizen voters.
There are enough one issue voters in country. For example pro-abortion voters. Another example is people addicted to free money from government. Forgiving student loans, $25,000 gift for first time home buyers. These are bribes pure and simple. Might just push Kommie Kamalian over the line.
regarding your #2...
Some states do not require registration by party affiliation.
No!!!"
Then you can only give money to candidates.
Flip flopping? Try treason and corruption for starters.
The past 3+ years is the definitive answer in the negative.... unless that was a purely rhetoric question
The question to keep asking her (i.e., Trump can keep saying at the debate, if it happens) is: “So why didn’t you do it?”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.