Posted on 05/11/2024 5:19:14 AM PDT by Twotone
There's been another internal email leak from a Pfizer ‘whistleblower’ to top off the testimony from Pfizer reps to Senator Malcolm Roberts at a recent Senate hearing in Australia. I tend to be more persuaded by the latter, but confirmations are always valuable. Click on the photo below to hear the Pfizer reps admit to this, and interestingly, what they say is almost verbatim what is written in the ‘internal email’.
Pfizer undertook to import a batch of vaccines specifically for the employee vaccination program. Theroux and Hewitt - Pfizer reps. (Forgive me if the names are mis-spelled.)
Here’s a screenshot of the ‘Whistleblower’ email. Source: https://slaynews.com/news/pfizer-whistleblower-leaks-email-separate-covid-shots-employees/.
The vaccine doses to be used for this program are separate and distinct from those committed by Pfizer to governments around the world and will not impact supply to national governments in any way. Pfizer ‘Whistleblower’
Well, that’s a relief. At least us employees in the ‘program’ won’t be diggin’ into the other government-mandated doses. Phew.
What exactly do they mean by separate and distinct? Separate, I can understand. Don’t want to take someone else’s precious shot - you know, favoritism is not allowed in government. But distinct? Huh? How are they distinct? Exactly? Exactly.
Let's repeat this really clearly.
Separate shots for 'employees'. This necessarily means one of two things: that there were batches that were less harmful than others, or that there were known placebo batches (saline injections - and I mean, true saline injections that would be harmless).
If the former is true, that there is known variation between batches (whatever this means), then the batches were designed this way. If THIS is true, then we have intent on our hands. I still have trouble imagining that they would be capable of varying at will or by demand in a way that would ever be predictably variably harmful. I mean, it seems to me that the manufacturing practices themselves were simply ridiculous in their bug-duggery (think DNA:RNA hybrids/contamination), so if we accept this as reality, how can we accept that they tailored batches to be variably harmful? Perhaps only some of them had the SV40 built into their plasmids for modified mRNA production? I don’t know.
Craig Pardekooper has been devout about batches having variable harms, and I have been writing about this for years now to try to understand the mechanisms by which this might be possible. And of course, there is the excellent study published by Schmeling et al. that reinforces that different batches are more highly-associated with serious adverse events, but still. How?
Could it be the people who make the difference? Genetic variations in ACE-2 receptors? Again, I don’t know for sure.
In any case, I believe that these 'reserved batches' for the Aussie employees were likely saline injections. As in, true saline injections.
After years of many of us trying to crack this egg, please pass on the gravity of this potential reality to whomever is interested in listening.
If there is variable toxicity in these batches of COVID-19 shots, this would also provide an explanation for the variability in AE and SAE presentations. It is very likely however, that other factors are at play. I want to stress this. Variability in harms also comes down to differences in the actual people injected, and most importantly, not only what they were injected with, but how, and if, the contents of the syringe were ‘cloudy’ or ‘clumpy’ or ‘degraded’ or etc...
If the batches were variable in their harm, then it was deliberate.
Otherwise, how would they know if something in manufacture caused it?
And if they knew that and released them anyways, it’s still deliberate.
But since they knew it at the time, then there’s no question it was deliberate.
I’m so glad I never got it. If it can be transferred from person to person, I can’t help that, but I can at least choose to not deliberately take it.
Non-sequitur. Variation happens naturally, without design. The question is: how much variation, was it desired or not?
I no longer have any contact with my extended family, who smugly called me a 'tin-foil hat' and banished me from get-togethers after my refusal to comply. They all took the initial jab plus 2 boosters. One had a stroke, one 'suddenly' developed aggressive bowel cancer, one got Parkinsons, and one got dementia. Another one has dizzy spells if she stands up too fast, which never happened before.
Not a single one of these people has publicly questioned if the vaxx is responsible for their respective devastating states of health. Not a single one. And they still don't speak to me. After 60 years of getting on well with them. I'm still gobsmacked at how they turned on me.
My gut feeling is that they know they got hoodwinked but will never admit it, and they now resent me. Very petty of them, and completely out of character, but these are strange times that we live in.
Possibly injectable Ivermectin
“Separate shots for ‘employees’. This necessarily means one of two things: that there were batches that were less harmful than others, or that there were known placebo batches (saline injections - and I mean, true saline injections that would be harmless).”
This is a classic example of ‘begging the question’ falacy. The fallacy of begging the question occurs when an argument’s premises assume the truth of the conclusion, instead of supporting it. In other words, you assume without proof the stand/position, or a significant part of the stand, that is in question. Begging the question is also called arguing in a circle.
Author is assuming that there are differences in the batches which is not in evidence. Separate and distinct can refer to many things. For example in the procurement contract or funding. This is a classic example of begging the question.
“Not a single one of these people has publicly questioned if the vaxx is responsible for their respective devastating states of health. Not a single one. And they still don’t speak to me. After 60 years of getting on well with them. I’m still gobsmacked at how they turned on me.”
Obviously these relatives are well passed the age when those things happen naturually.
I was screamed at (literally) .... YOU CAN DIE!!! ... if you don’t get the jab. I was called a ‘conspiracy theorist’ & probably worse behind my back. I did reach out to a pregnant niece & gave her enough info she defied her OB & didn’t get the jabs while pregnant (healthy baby) & she is the one person in the family I can discuss openly and honestly anything about the jab. The person who screamed at me then told me recently that I was “proud” because I was ‘right’. My response was that I am not proud at all ... in fact, I am heartsick because people I love and care for are dead, dying or sick since they got jabbed. My cancer list, for example, is over a dozen & some are dead already.
Very sorry about your extended family ... it’s extremely hurtful when people you never expect to turn on you do ... even if they come around somewhat, from experience I can tell you some level of hurt never goes away.
I posted a ‘cartoon’ which sort of tells the tale ... the unjabbed can’t win for losing with a good number of jabbed ... some HAVE seen the light and now they feel like they’re a ticking time bomb ...
https://freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/4236651/posts?page=17#17
An apt cartoon. We are civil to our in-laws but they are die hard Democrats (but they are not crowing too loudly now) and were angry at us for not getting the jab. Of course they got Covid repeatedly. They blamed the unjabbed instead of their weakened immune system. other military in-laws were forced to get the jab or lose their careers (pension). They have suffered medical problems ever since but we never bring it up.
Heaven forbid anyone ever question why this is happening. Because ever asking why is just begging a question. go F yourself
The cynic in me thinks every one of the Dems in Congress got a shot of saline, and knew it. Probably demanded it!
The vaccine harm was very much batch related for Pfizer. The anon’s on the chans had a spreadsheet early which had batch numbers and contents analysis. Batches were very different. People were going back to the vaccination cards and seeing if their batch number was bad.
I’ve wondered how many of the Pfizer batches were actually spoiled when injected due to the storage temp requirement. Way too many people involved for stupidity and human error to have implications on outcomes.
The email, dated January 8, 2021, was leaked to Infowars by the Pfizer insider.Gee: I wonder why a leaker on such a profound, GLOBAL matter would go to ALEX JONES and NOT the fib, his congresscritter, a select group of independent journalists or, for that matter, the bevy of reporters ardently working for the msm...let alone waiting 3 years to leak said information...and almost a YEAR after Pfizer admitted such to a Senate committee... /s
There's obviously much, much MORE to this story, and I suspect that this is a PLANT...a ruse to cover their culpability. Obviously, we can all speculate, but I fully expect this story to go NOWHERE in terms of bad for pfizer or, for that matter, fauci inc. If anything, I fully expect to learn that pfizer employees and 'essential contractors' are curiously immune to the side effects now being exposed among the general public, perhaps even that these same batches were provided to the US government federal/state employees in protected batches under the same ruse (to not impact the supply chain for the public)...and that the feds/fauci/et al knew about it the whole time.
...and nothing will come of it, except alarming reports concerning public health of jab recipients over the coming 2-3 years...and a relatively stable pfizer stock price. /s
Whistleblower:
“I know we employees at Pfizer were receiving different vaccines and/or placebos and this was the word around my site when I worked there.”
The feeling of loss is real but consider yourself fortunate. They showed their true selves; a liability at best.
Cot shot threads are the only ones that you seem to comment on. You are either a super creepy hypochondriac sheep or a Pfizer employee.
wildcard_redneck wrote: “Cot shot threads are the only ones that you seem to comment on. You are either a super creepy hypochondriac sheep or a Pfizer employee.”
Or just someone who likes to correct the bullcrap anti-vaxxer narrative.
Dartoid wrote: “Heaven forbid anyone ever question why this is happening. Because ever asking why is just begging a question.”
Didn’t you notice that the author was using a logical fallacy to make his point?
“H-y-p-o-t-h-e-s-i-s.”
I wish I had NOT been jabbed, but Dad was dying at the time and his caretakers would not let me see him unless I was vaccinated. Also, the VA was putting tons of pressure on we Vets to get our ‘free’ shots. I took the two-step one. The second injection was awful! I didn’t get sick, but my are was hard to use for a few days. I refused any and all boosters the VA was trying to get me to take.
That said, after I complied with all of their requests, Dad’s facility STILL wouldn’t let me in to be with him. The last day I saw him was March 12, 2020 when they started the lock down of their facility - it was just pure LUCK I was there that day! Dad died, ALONE, on May 31, 2020.
I thought I could NOT loathe Mother Government more than I already did - but I do! NONE of this data surprises me. None of it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.