If the batches were variable in their harm, then it was deliberate.
Otherwise, how would they know if something in manufacture caused it?
And if they knew that and released them anyways, it’s still deliberate.
But since they knew it at the time, then there’s no question it was deliberate.
I’m so glad I never got it. If it can be transferred from person to person, I can’t help that, but I can at least choose to not deliberately take it.
Non-sequitur. Variation happens naturally, without design. The question is: how much variation, was it desired or not?
I no longer have any contact with my extended family, who smugly called me a 'tin-foil hat' and banished me from get-togethers after my refusal to comply. They all took the initial jab plus 2 boosters. One had a stroke, one 'suddenly' developed aggressive bowel cancer, one got Parkinsons, and one got dementia. Another one has dizzy spells if she stands up too fast, which never happened before.
Not a single one of these people has publicly questioned if the vaxx is responsible for their respective devastating states of health. Not a single one. And they still don't speak to me. After 60 years of getting on well with them. I'm still gobsmacked at how they turned on me.
My gut feeling is that they know they got hoodwinked but will never admit it, and they now resent me. Very petty of them, and completely out of character, but these are strange times that we live in.
Possibly injectable Ivermectin
“Separate shots for ‘employees’. This necessarily means one of two things: that there were batches that were less harmful than others, or that there were known placebo batches (saline injections - and I mean, true saline injections that would be harmless).”
This is a classic example of ‘begging the question’ falacy. The fallacy of begging the question occurs when an argument’s premises assume the truth of the conclusion, instead of supporting it. In other words, you assume without proof the stand/position, or a significant part of the stand, that is in question. Begging the question is also called arguing in a circle.
Author is assuming that there are differences in the batches which is not in evidence. Separate and distinct can refer to many things. For example in the procurement contract or funding. This is a classic example of begging the question.
The cynic in me thinks every one of the Dems in Congress got a shot of saline, and knew it. Probably demanded it!
The vaccine harm was very much batch related for Pfizer. The anon’s on the chans had a spreadsheet early which had batch numbers and contents analysis. Batches were very different. People were going back to the vaccination cards and seeing if their batch number was bad.
I’ve wondered how many of the Pfizer batches were actually spoiled when injected due to the storage temp requirement. Way too many people involved for stupidity and human error to have implications on outcomes.
The email, dated January 8, 2021, was leaked to Infowars by the Pfizer insider.Gee: I wonder why a leaker on such a profound, GLOBAL matter would go to ALEX JONES and NOT the fib, his congresscritter, a select group of independent journalists or, for that matter, the bevy of reporters ardently working for the msm...let alone waiting 3 years to leak said information...and almost a YEAR after Pfizer admitted such to a Senate committee... /s
There's obviously much, much MORE to this story, and I suspect that this is a PLANT...a ruse to cover their culpability. Obviously, we can all speculate, but I fully expect this story to go NOWHERE in terms of bad for pfizer or, for that matter, fauci inc. If anything, I fully expect to learn that pfizer employees and 'essential contractors' are curiously immune to the side effects now being exposed among the general public, perhaps even that these same batches were provided to the US government federal/state employees in protected batches under the same ruse (to not impact the supply chain for the public)...and that the feds/fauci/et al knew about it the whole time.
...and nothing will come of it, except alarming reports concerning public health of jab recipients over the coming 2-3 years...and a relatively stable pfizer stock price. /s
Whistleblower:
“I know we employees at Pfizer were receiving different vaccines and/or placebos and this was the word around my site when I worked there.”
It didn’t matter what was in them. If you had half a brain you wouldn’t take it at all. Lots of people fell for it though.
“Reserved batches” = saline
metmom : "If the batches were variable in their harm, then it was deliberate.
Otherwise, how would they know if something in manufacture caused it?
And if they knew that and released them anyways, it’s still deliberate.
But since they knew it at the time, then there’s no question it was deliberate."
(From the article): ”There's been another internal email leak from a Pfizer ‘whistleblower’ to top off the testimony from Pfizer reps to Senator Malcolm Roberts at a recent Senate hearing in Australia.
I tend to be more persuaded by the latter, but confirmations are always valuable.
Click on the photo below to hear the Pfizer reps admit to this, and interestingly, what they say is almost verbatim what is written in the ‘internal email’. “
”Pfizer undertook to import a batch of vaccines specifically for the employee vaccination program.
Theroux and Hewitt - Pfizer reps. (Forgive me if the names are mis-spelled.) “
”Here’s a screenshot of the ‘Whistleblower’ email.(in the article)
Source:
https://slaynews.com/news/pfizer-whistleblower-leaks-email-separate-covid-shots-employees/. “
”The vaccine doses to be used for this program are separate and distinct from those committed by Pfizer to governments around the world
and will not impact supply to national governments in any way. Pfizer ‘Whistleblower’ ...”
Separate shots for 'employees'.
This necessarily means one of two things: that there were batches that were less harmful than others, or that there were known placebo batches (saline injections - and I mean, true saline injections that would be harmless). “
If the former is true, that there is known variation between batches (whatever this means), then the batches were designed this way.
If THIS is true, then we have intent on our hands.
I still have trouble imagining that they would be capable of varying at will or by demand in a way that would ever be predictably variably harmful. “
(My Opinion) : This probably explains why Jacinda Ardern, former Prime Minister of New Zealand (2017–2023), and an active agent of the World Economic Forum (WEF), retired suddenly
after a government agent detected different responses to different batches of the covid vaxxine in the limited numbers of the New Zealand population.
The day the whistle-blower released his data, he was immediately arrested,
and Jacinda Arden threatened anyone who released his data with incarceration, even though she was no longer in office.
The location and disposition of that whistle-blower, who demonstrated different effects of different batches of vaxxine remains unknown at this time
How is this not a crime against humanity with different batches having different effects, including injury, adverse effects, or death ?..which negates all civil indemnity ?
How is this batch differences, NOT A CRIMINAL FRAUD ?
The ol’ “Don’t pee in your own...”
Congress and related federal agencies enabled their own work-arounds.
PING
We should be demanding to see the aggregate health data of all Pfizer employees and contractors and compare this to a similar size group of people, such as the employees of a large health system, who were mandated to get the jabs to see if there are any statistically significant differences.