Posted on 04/06/2024 3:53:10 PM PDT by Roman_War_Criminal
Data analyst Edward Dowd said and has unveiled startling data that points to a significant and troubling rise in cancer deaths. The former Wall Street analyst and BlackRock portfolio manager, Dowd is the co founder of Phinace Technologies, who conduct data driven research with a mission to build “knowledge” as with “knowledge, informed decisions can be made, with the possible risks and rewards emerging organically from the process.” they argue. The latest report from Phinace Technologies, authored by Carlos Alegria and Yuri Nunes, uncovers a disturbing trend in cancer deaths among elderly people following the rollout of the COVID-19 injections, specifically in the 75 to 84 age group.
Edward Dowd appeared on the Dr. Drew show on Wednesday and told Dr. Kelly Victory, a board-certified trauma and emergency specialist with over 30 years of clinical experience, Dowd told Dr Kelly “There was no signal in 2020, however, there was a “clear deviation” in 2021 and 2022″ Vigilant Fox reported
In 2020, underlying cancer deaths followed the trend and dropped to about 1021 deaths per 100,000 people. Cancer deaths rose to 1049 per 100,000 in 2021, then increased again to 1091 per 100,000 in 2022.
The data from 2022 shows a 6.85% rise in underlying cancer mortality rates per 100,000 people when compared to 2020. This is particularly noteworthy because it reverses a longstanding trend of declining cancer death rates. Moreover, when compared to the 2010 to 2019 trend, the rate of underlying cancer deaths in 2022 exceeded expectations by 11% to 12%.
(Excerpt) Read more at expose-news.com ...
So you are posting numbers from the CDC??? OMG, LOL, LOL, LOL!!!
Colorectal cancer is very slow growing you dont just keel over and die from it. The cancer that was in her liver was and I quote the oncologist “ A rare and aggressive cancer with no known treatment “. The vaxx triggers cancers to return and also triggers other kinds of “ turbo” cancers.
My other cousin who got vaxxed has developed some weird cancer in both her arms. Her oncologist told her its likely due to the vaxx. They are actually admitting it now.
Deep State is screwing with ICD-10 coding for a reason...
...bombarded... anecdotal...
...and who d’ya think is the side that’s propagandizing/gaslighting?
gaslight
There's your lie. It's not a vaccine, and that's not its only effect.
IBTZ
“recently by a vaccine whose only effect is to cause the immune system to behave in its natural fashion, by creating antibodies against an infectious disease?”
That is not how the mutatedRNA vaxes work and you know it. You continue to lie by conflating real vaxes with how the mutatedRNA vaxes work. The mutatedRNA vaxes work by reprogramming your cells to make spike protein. Real vaxes do not reprogram and force your cells to make spike protein. Real vaxes do not force your heart cells, kidney cells , and other cells to be reprogrammed to make spike poison.
This has never ever been done before in the history of medicine and you have no idea what that actually does to people, in their bodies. It is completely plausible that this is causing cancer and all sorts of other problems. But I could be wrong, it may all be safe and effective, safe and effective, safe and effective.
Um, yeah. Can you explain in scientific terms what "mutatedRNA" is? Do you even know what RNA is and describe all of its various physical forms and functions?
I doubt it.
RNA (of all types) mutates readily. This is because there are not RNA repair enzymes the way there are DNA repair enzymes. But never mind. I can tell that you have never taken any sort of molecular biology course.
The mutatedRNA vaxes work by reprogramming your cells to make spike protein.
Are you aware that every time you catch a viral infection, billions of cells in your body are "reprogrammed" to do nothing but make new viruses? That means that those cells that used to belong to you now belong to a virus. And they make virus genomes, mRNA, and proteins from which they make new viruses until they either burst from the mass of viruses inside them or are killed by your immune system. If you are lucky, that is. There are plenty of viruses that kill before the immune system ever mounts a response.
An mRNA vaccine, on the other hand, only directs cells at the injection site to make one single virus protein for a few hours. mRNA has a very short half-life. Within a couple of days, the mRNA is gone. Because a single mRNA message is incapable of taking over the function of a cell, the cell continues all of its normal functions while making spike protein.
Oh, and some viruses never leave your body. They stay forever, forcing cells to do nothing but make new viruses. Some coronaviruses are known to do this. Herpes viruses and papillomaviruses also do this. Ever have chickenpox? Then the chickenpox virus is still in your body.
Viruses are nasty. Yet you are going to choose to be afraid of a vaccine because some antivaxxers who want people to die told you a bunch of lies that they know you don't know how to fact-check.
This is my biggest problem with you. As an amazing scientist and researcher, you know that you are right. Except you don’t understand that you may be right, but in regards to these bio weapons, you are wrong. It is impossible and inconceivable to you that your knowledge is wrong.
For example, “mrna has a short half life”, except the mutatedRNA,bioweapon has been shown to be able to replicate for 6 months and maybe longer in some people. You are right in every sense thar real mrna has a short half life, but it is inconceivable that the bioweapon lasts longer and you insist on associating the two. You are right in your studies and wisdom, but utterly wrong here. That, but Horatio, there are more things in heaven and earth, than are dreamt of in your philosophy and learning.
The reason I keep lumping in the vaccine mRNA with every other mRNA in existence is that, chemically and physically, it is no different than any of the other gadzillions of mRNA molecules that exist.
First, let me explain the process of gene to protein information transfer.
Information about the protein’s amino acid content and structure is contained in the genes. In humans, genes are stored in DNA, but in a large number of viruses, genes are stored in RNA. Special enzymes called “RNA polymerases” then “read” the gene and make a corresponding copy of it in pre-messenger RNA. This is called “transcription.”
This pre-mRNA is then processed extensively (i.e. it is modified) in order to produce a mature mRNA. The mature mRNA then attaches to the ribosome, which reads it. Some of the mRNA is just instructions. In the middle of the instructions is a portion which encodes the protein in sets of three nucleotides called “codons” or the “triplet code.” The ribosome reads each codon and adds an amino acid corresponding to that codon. Once it reaches a stop signal, the ribosome releases the mRNA and the new protein. This process is called “translation.” The used mRNA could attach to another ribosome or be attacked by the RNAse enzymes that destroy it. Even if the mRNA attaches to another ribosome right away, it cannot escape the RNAse enzymes forever. So, typically, any mRNA has a half-life of a few hours. And in the science world, we pretty much consider a substance to be gone once we have reached six half-lives. Thus, if the half-life is five hours, that mRNA is gone within 30 hours.
The modifications to the mRNA contained in the vaccine was to exchange some of the uridine nucleotides with pseudouridine. Pseudouridine is a naturally occurring nucleotide that exists naturally in some of the bacteria that live in your body. Since it exists naturally, the enzymes in your body that process uridine are perfectly capable of processing pseudouridine.
The purpose of the uridine -> pseudouridine substition is to “hide” the mRNA from the immune system components in the blood that would otherwise destroy it before it has a chance to get inside cells. If the mRNA is destroyed in the blood before it can get into cells, then it will not direct the temporary production of spike antigen and no immune response directed against the spike will occur. Once vaccine mRNA enters cells, a fraction of it is able to escape the lipid coating and cell endosome in order to access the cytoplasm where the ribosomes are. The ribosomes are factories that make proteins. The mRNA attaches to the ribosome, directs the production of one or more spike protein molecules, and falls off. Once it falls off, it is chopped up into individual nucleotides which are either excreted to eventually end up eliminated in urine, or they are recycled to make new mRNAs.
The cellular enzymes and machinery that interact with mRNA process pseudouridine exactly the same way they process uridine. The fact that there is no difference in the way uridine and pseudouridine are processed is one reason why the vaccine mRNA has some pseudouridine substituted for uridine.
No mRNA lasts more than a few hours.
No mRNA is self-replicating. While there are self-replicating RNA molecules, they are not messenger RNA. And even self-replicating RNA molecules cannot escape the RNAses actively seeking to destroy them.
If it were possible for the vaccine mRNA to last for six months, the vaccine would provide a lot more protection because the continued production of spike protein would keep reminding the immune system to make antibodies against it. However, since vaccine mRNA is just as short-lived as every other mRNA, the spike protein production only lasts for a few hours. Eventually, after the spike protein is all destroyed, the immune system forgets that it ever encountered spike and stops producing antibodies. This is why vaccine boosters are needed occasionally. The immune system simply is not capable of remembering coronavirus proteins for a long period of time.
I do find it ironic that antivaxxers try to scare people by telling them that the vaccine stays in their bodies for a long time, but also tells people that it isn’t a “real” vaccine because the immunity only lasts for months. If only the vaccine would stick around longer, it would then become a “real” vaccine by antivax definition, since the immunity would then stick around for a prolonged period of time.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.