Posted on 04/06/2024 11:58:13 AM PDT by John Semmens
This week, Karl Rove, the political genius who guided former President George W. Bush to two election victories, predicted that Trump's pledge to review all the cases of the January 6 defendants and pardon those who deserve clemency"will sink his campaign. There isn't an innocent person in the whole bunch. They illegally trespassed on government property while official proceedings were underway."
Rove rejected claims that the mostly peaceful January 6 demonstrators should be treated the same way that those demonstrating against the death of George Floyd in 2020 while in the custody of Minneapolis police officers were, saying "none of the Floyd protesters terrified the members of Congress like the January 6 crowd did. The billions of dollars in property damage and the 19 deaths that occurred during the Floyd protests did not directly challenge the right of the national government's rule over the people. They were not insurrectionists."
One of the "thugs" that Rove feels needs to be taught to obey the law is 71-year-old grandmother Rebecca Lavrenz. This week she was convicted of entering the Capitol through wide-open doors at 2:43 pm on January 6, 2021 and exiting at 2:53 pm. The penalty for her misdemeanor infractions could amount to fines up to $200,000 and up to one year of imprisonment.
Meanwhile, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has refused to disclose the identity of suspected FBI agents present in the January 6 crowd. January 6 defendant William Pope asserts that "they are witnesses crucial to my defense." A redacted DOJ spokesman explained that "every advanced nation has secret police. We can't expect to keep up with our adversaries if we don't exploit this same capability. The enemies of democracy are the most serious problem this country has ever had to face. Suppressing this threat is a risky job. The identities of the brave men, women and non-binary individuals doing this job must remain private. There is already enough evidence to convict Mr. Pope without any testimony from these agents."
If you missed any of the other Semi-News/Semi-Satire posts you can find them at...
https://www.gopbriefingroom.com/index.php/topic,528893.0.html
He kept expecting to be able to relive his experiences in stir.
Damn, that boy is gay as hell. He keeps fantasizing about seeing people get it in the can. I bet he strokes to the fantasy, too.
Watch, he’ll respond with some gay comment or another. He’s THAT obsessed with buggery.
Give it up. You’ve done stuff I’ve never even considered doing.
Are you speling or speling about speling?
If I’ve been incarcerated, you’ve been giving it up for the prison b*tch*s.
For all the time you've done in prison, you still don't know what a 'bitch' is?
In one sentence you say: you’ve been giving it up
In the next sentence you say: Give it up.
You have a serious attachment to your anal sex fantasy.
You’ve done stuff I’ve never even considered doing.
You don't consider it. You don't have to think about it at all. It is your gay reflex.
STOP BEING GAY. Just stop it.
You cannot spell. Your grammar is horrid. You cannot separate reality from your gay anal fantasies.
You got issues.
I've had enough fun screwing with you. I hadn’t noticed.
Oh, OK, I see what you were saying rhetorically. Please forgive me; I got no sleep last night while my family member was in hospital.
Yes, Bush was widely criticized for never clapping back, no matter how viscious the attacks.
I hope your family member is doing better.
One of my biggest complaints about President Bush - he seemingly never fought back politically. He also was a pretty poor extemporaneous speaker. His press conferences were painful to watch.
Biden doesn’t have that problem. He just holds so few and knows the questions in advance.
The media is so pathetically intellectually lazy. You just have to laugh at their low energy.
“ directly challenge the right of the national government’s rule over the people.”
Hopefully that disgusting pig didn’t really say that.
Thank you.
Agreeing with your post.
As for the bitches, that’s what you called them. I guessed it was similiar to what the gay guys were called in Shawshank. Sisters.
All Stealth Liberals, especially gay ones like you, will be banned.
3 strikes. Not gay. You are. Not liberal, but folks like you are pushing me that way and certainly not stealth. I post things I think are relevant.
You are a stealth liberal and people all across the forum are taking notice. I intend to see you banned from this forum. It is my only goal for now.
And you are gay.
How sick. Trying to stop free speech. Destroy what I write.
To paraphrase the old chestnut: The first amendment is the refuge of a scoundrel.
Second, this is not a free speech forum.
Third, it is not even a free speech issue. You are free to go to Democrat Underground to spread your lies and your opposition to all conservatives.
Oh, and another observation: No amount of forum arguing could EVER get me to go liberal.
So all this statement does, is prove you have liberal leanings looking for an excuse to emerge.
Personally, I suspect you are a full-on liberal already... who merely slipped up with that comment.
And yet you’d protest Zuck moderating or banning a poster. I have never been to DU. And what’s your fear? Strong willed Freepers jumping ship? Or being influenced by me?
This, FR, is clearly labeled as a conservative forum. If Facebook was clearly labeled as a liberal one, I'd have little concern for his moderation or banning.
I have never been to DU.
You might find it to your liking.
And what’s your fear? Strong willed Freepers jumping ship? Or being influenced by me?
Fear? Naw. More like annoyance. I have to read or hear liberal viewpoints and lies all the time in the liberal media. I come here for refuge from that. I don't want liberals here.
So, I advise you go now.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.