Good effort but unfortunately it will fail in SCOTUS. SCOTUS will uphold state’s rights to hold elections as they wish even as flawed as they are. And the Constitution would actually support this ruling.
That’s only one aspect. The primary is corrupt and dishonest individuals whom we’ve entrusted to oversee one of our most sacred institutions.
We have to find a way, through legislated code, to strictly prohibit those who advocate against the principles expressed in our founding documents from ever appearing on a ballot.
They cannot honestly take the oath of office, so why even allow them to run?
My parents, schools and society taught me that I could have a say in how my government is run by voting.
If my vote is meaningless, the government is not determined by voting, then why should I pay taxes or obey the laws?
They spent millions on the clown Arizona “audit” and (1) didn’t check signatures, and (2) didn’t do a canvas.
Lets say that SCOTUS accepts that plaintiffs have new evidence showing that it is possible that the election machines and software were (and still are) easy to hack. The first thing they will ask for is proof that the systems WERE hacked and that this altered the results of the election. (By analogy, a prosecutor could say that some individual was capable of attempting to rob the local bank. Maybe that’s true. Now establish that the bank was robbed.)
What is the evidence that vast amounts of digital vote manipulation actually occurred? Lake suffered from voting day machine problems, and that might be connected to the claimed new evidence. Seems to me that the 2020 elections were rigged mostly by insiders, illegal registration, mail-in votes without proper signature verification, non-residents, illegal ballot collection/fabrication/drop-box stuffing, etc.
I want Lake to succeed, but I have to put my money on the deck being stacked yet again.