Good effort but unfortunately it will fail in SCOTUS. SCOTUS will uphold state’s rights to hold elections as they wish even as flawed as they are. And the Constitution would actually support this ruling.
Not necessarily. I point to their interjection into the Bush V Gore election in 2000.
Hmm... a major crime has been committed. I would think that warrants SCOTUS intervention. If this doesn't then nothing does.
“Good effort but unfortunately it will fail in SCOTUS.”
Not convinced you are correct. While the states to get a broad autonmy when it comes to how the manner in which elections are held, in this case it appears that AZ state officials have perjured themselves in testimony before a federal court.
While states can invoke Article I Section 4 of the Constitution on state privileges for the election process, the process itself cannot allow for a fraudulent outcome that would result in harm to the state’s citizens or other states.
I don’t think SCOTUS will entertain fraud, or the potential for fraud, as a legitimate state claim. That is, if in fact fraud can be demonstrated.
SCOTUS can absolutely require that any state election process be auditable for accuracy and legitimate election outcomes.
No it will fail for the same reason that Texas was ordered to let the feds take down the wire. Because the USSC does not care about America or the constitution. Just ask Texas.
The federal government shall protect the states from invasion.
The Federal government also has the power to prevent corruption among the states. I can’t remember the exact wording, but in certain ways the states have to be uncorrupted and uniform.