How did John Fetterman grow a full beard between these 2 pictures supposedly taken on the same day? 😂 pic.twitter.com/OWnmjoGmJo— Alex Rosen (@iFightForKids) September 17, 2023
Posted on 09/18/2023 10:05:09 AM PDT by CFW
Ever since video spread far and wide last week of Sen. John Fetterman (D-Uncle Fester) reacting with sarcastic derision to news that House Republicans were considering beginning a formal impeachment inquiry against Old Joe Biden, rumors have been flying that the guy in the video wasn’t Fetterman at all.
Twitter/X is full of detailed comparisons of still photos from each, with the slovenly socialist’s supporters deriding doubters as crazed conspiracy theorists going nuts over photos taken with different lighting or from different angles. Amid all the back-and-forth about whether there are now two Fettermans, however, the biggest part of the story has been missed, and that is this: when did this man become coherent?
Fetterman himself started the rumors flying in mid-August when he radically changed his look, shaving his salt-and-pepper goatee and growing a thick brown mustache. That has led to a blizzard of photo comparisons. On Sunday, journalist Alex Rosen posted two photos in which Fetterman looks very different with the question: “How did John Fetterman grow a full beard between these 2 pictures supposedly taken on the same day?” X’ers pointed out that one of his photos was actually taken over a year before the other, but that didn’t actually address the fact that Fetterman really does look quite different in both.
(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
Tattoos just disappeared
Fetterman Has Been Replaced With a Double...?
Where did they find him? is the circus in town?
We don’t really elect our politicians anymore.
So, if the guy playing the role of a particular politician (ex. Fetterman, Biden, etc.) gets switched out and replaced with some other guy, I’m not sure it matters. It’s all theater.
Yes.
see my post #5
THe “biggest oddity” is Fetterman himself ... although he is the Democrat/Communist Party’s ideal politician (along with Feinstein, Pelosi and FJB himself).
How did John Fetterman grow a full beard between these 2 pictures supposedly taken on the same day? 😂 pic.twitter.com/OWnmjoGmJo— Alex Rosen (@iFightForKids) September 17, 2023
“Tattoos just disappeared”
I wouldn’t put it past them to replace Fetterman with a double. They could have found someone and been training the for the past several months. Given all they evil things the “deep state” has done to and in this nation over the past few decades, it is certainly not beyond my imagination that they would do something like this.
It would be easy to substitute an imposter for Fetterman—all that’s needed is to get a gorilla, shave its a$$ and teach it grunt while walking backwards.
My question is: “How could a majority of Pennsylvania voters truly vote for such idiocy?”
It boggles the mind to know this idiot was elected. Appears to me Pennsylvania’s electorate is even dumber than California’s, and that is quite a statement coming from because I live in California and witness mind boggling idiocy every day.
Ping
Need before and after side shots for comparison - the ears don’t lie. Ear prints are used in court same as finger prints.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) quietly has directed the Senate's Sergeant at Arms to no longer enforce the chamber's informal dress code for its members, Axios has learned.
Why it matters: The new directive will allow Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.), who tends to favor gym shorts and hoodies over the business attire traditionally required in the chamber, to linger on the Senate floor before and after votes.
"Senators are able to choose what they wear on the Senate floor. I will continue to wear a suit," Schumer said in a statement to Axios.
Fetterman, who was elected last year, initially followed Senate tradition and wore suits. But since returning to the Senate after being treated for clinical depression earlier this year, he frequently has sported the casual look he was known for as Pennsylvania's lieutenant governor.
Zoom in: The updated rule will go into effect this week, according to a Senate official. The change applies only to senators — staff members will still be required to follow the old dress code.
Under that standard, men and women have been required to wear business attire on the Senate floor — which has meant coat and tie for men.
But senators fresh off a plane or from the gym could circumvent the dress code by voting from the edge of the Senate floor, with one foot still in the cloakroom.
They could hold their thumb up or down to indicate their vote and then step back out of the chamber. Technically, they weren't considered to be in violation of the floor's dress code. Fetterman and other senators have voted this way.
The intrigue: It's unclear whether the Senate dress code is actually an official, written policy. It appears to be more of an informal custom, enforced by the Sergeant at Arms.
No senior staff contacted by Axios on Friday could find a written record of the rules — an omission that also has puzzled some on social media.
Between the lines: Five years ago, Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) petitioned her colleagues to make some changes in the dress code, according to New York Times reporter Jennifer Steinhauer's book "The Firsts: the Inside Story of the Women Reshaping Congress."
After some grumbling by males, the standards for women's attire were relaxed. Afterward, women on the Senate floor were allowed to show their arms. Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (I-Ariz.), a triathlete, often goes sleeveless.
The other side: The House rules, which are more formal, also have been challenged — and updated — in recent years.
There are lots of claims of “doubles” in DC—including of course the Commander In Thief.
Those who know are not talking—those who are talking do not know.
They just stood under the Ugly Tree and waited a few minutes.
Hitler had a double...
Borman had a double...
D.C. learned a lot from the nazis.
> It boggles the mind to know this idiot was elected. <
This comes up quite frequently here on FR. And rightly so.
I guess I’ve made it my mission to explain the situation.
Three points, please.
1. The press did a good job hiding Fetterman’s many faults. Unless you’re on a site like Free Republic, you probably didn’t know just how bad Fetterman really is.
2. Fetterman’s campaign ads were very well done. They painted him as Joe Everyman, a solid guy you’d want as a friend and neighbor.
3. Dr. Oz (Fetterman’s opponent) ran truly awful ads. Really bad. They had Oz wandering around PA factories like he was lost. Oz was all wrong for Pennsylvania. And his stupid campaign ads didn’t help.
1+2+3 = the perfect election storm. And I’m not even talking about the usual D cheating.
Will the GOP learn anything from this PA fiasco? Probably not.
Recovering speech over the course of a year is a bigger oddity than completely changing in appearance?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.