Posted on 09/18/2023 10:05:09 AM PDT by CFW
Ever since video spread far and wide last week of Sen. John Fetterman (D-Uncle Fester) reacting with sarcastic derision to news that House Republicans were considering beginning a formal impeachment inquiry against Old Joe Biden, rumors have been flying that the guy in the video wasn’t Fetterman at all.
Twitter/X is full of detailed comparisons of still photos from each, with the slovenly socialist’s supporters deriding doubters as crazed conspiracy theorists going nuts over photos taken with different lighting or from different angles. Amid all the back-and-forth about whether there are now two Fettermans, however, the biggest part of the story has been missed, and that is this: when did this man become coherent?
Fetterman himself started the rumors flying in mid-August when he radically changed his look, shaving his salt-and-pepper goatee and growing a thick brown mustache. That has led to a blizzard of photo comparisons. On Sunday, journalist Alex Rosen posted two photos in which Fetterman looks very different with the question: “How did John Fetterman grow a full beard between these 2 pictures supposedly taken on the same day?” X’ers pointed out that one of his photos was actually taken over a year before the other, but that didn’t actually address the fact that Fetterman really does look quite different in both.
(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
The Fetterdope with the glasses doe not look that much like Fetterman.
Notice how they added what accounts to a Groucho mustache and some eyeglasses.
Fetterman's reaction to Speaker McCarthy and the impeachment inquiry...
One is bad enough
He’s had those deep-set, dark, nearly-closed, scowling, scary eyes you see in the bottom photo. Now, in the top photo, the eyes are bright, wide open and forward and cheerful.
The forehead and wrinkles are different, too.
It does not look like the same person.
A DC Cornerstone Issue That Must Be Understood – This Isn’t What You Learned on Schoolhouse RockMost people think when they vote for a federal politician -a House or Senate representative- they are voting for a person who will go to Washington DC and write or enact legislation. This is the old-fashioned “schoolhouse rock” perspective based on decades past. There is not a single person in Congress writing legislation or laws.
In modern politics, not a single member of the House of Representatives or Senator writes a law, or puts pen to paper to write out a legislative construct. This simply doesn’t happen.
Over the past several decades a system of constructing legislation has taken over Washington DC that more resembles a business operation than a legislative body.
The important part to remember is that the origination of the entire process is EXTERNAL to Congress.
Congress does not write laws or legislation, special interest groups do. Lobbyists are paid, some very well paid, to get politicians to go along with the need of the legislative group.
When you are voting for a Congressional Rep or a U.S. Senator, you are NOT voting for a person who will write laws. Your rep only votes on legislation to approve or disapprove of constructs that are written by outside groups and sold to them through lobbyists who work for those outside groups.
While all of this is happening, the same outside groups who write the laws are providing money for the campaigns of the politicians they need to pass them. This construct sets up the quid-pro-quo of influence, although much of it is fraught with plausible deniability.
This is the way legislation is created.
Last week out was alien mummies. Yesterday it was DEWs in Maui. Now it’s Invasion of the Body Snatchers in DC.
FR is veering into Steve Quayle territory.
A detective once told me to compare ears and hands - those features can’t be easily changed.
Is he unable to dress himself?
Sure seems that way.
Last week out was alien mummies. Yesterday it was DEWs in Maui. Now it’s Invasion of the Body Snatchers in DC.
FR is veering into Steve Quayle territory.
Yet, here you are.
Why, when you’re in the VERY small minority?
(See tagline, btw.)
but but... the double identifies as fatterman
Pennsylvania has at least 10-12 Fettermen!!!!
Its not Fetterman.
“Twitter/X is full of detailed comparisons of still photos from each, with the slovenly socialist’s supporters deriding doubters as crazed conspiracy theorists going nuts over photos taken with different lighting or from different angles.”
LOL
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.