Townhall Media/Madeline Leesman
Posted on 03/24/2023 6:18:15 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Townhall Media/Madeline Leesman
On Friday, the GOP-led House passed a Parents Bill of Rights despite Democrat opposition to it. The bill passed narrowly — 213 to 208 — with a handful of Republicans voting against it and no Democrats voting in favor of it. The Bill is designed to promote transparency by requiring school districts to publicly post curricula, including lists of books and other reading material that will be made available to students.
Friday morning, ahead of the vote, House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) expressed his support for the legislation on Twitter.
The House is about to vote on H.R. 5, the Parents Bill of Rights.
It doesn’t matter the color of your skin, the zip code you live in, or the wealth you have. As a parent, you should have a right to know what's going on inside your child's classroom. https://t.co/zKZJhJlz9g
— Kevin McCarthy (@SpeakerMcCarthy) March 24, 2023
The House is about to vote on H.R. 5, the Parents Bill of Rights. It doesn’t matter the color of your skin, the zip code you live in, or the wealth you have. As a parent, you should have a right to know what’s going on inside your child’s classroom.
Democrats opposed to the bill maintain that the true aim of the legislation is “fascist” and “extreme” and will lead to book-banning and the outing of LGBTQ+ students. But Republicans pushed for the bill in response to a groundswell of support from the Republican base.
The GOP bill is a response to growing anger across the country about access to information on everything from school curricula to safety and mask policies to the prevalence of gender ideology and critical race theory in the classroom. Parents’ anger over these issues at school board meetings led to an effort by the Biden administration’s Justice Department to examine the “disturbing trend” of violent threats against school officials.
House Republicans reacted by approving the Parents Bill of Rights Act, which would require school districts to give parents access to curriculum and reading lists and would require schools to inform parents if school staff begin encouraging or promoting their child’s gender transition.
Passage of the bill comes at a time when many state legislatures are also debating and enacting measures designed to add transparency and support parents who have been stunned and angered at the push from many in education to indoctrinate students with progressive/Marxist ideals, all while shutting parents out of the process.
While the Democrats railed against the measure, attributing the push for it to “extreme MAGA Republicans,” who, according to Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY), “don’t want the children of America to learn about the Holocaust,” and “want to ban books, they want to bully the LGBTQ+ community, they want to bring guns into classrooms, kindergarten and above,” Republicans waved off those arguments.
“Nowhere in this bill is it banning any books,” asserted Rep. Ralph Norman, R-S.C., who said the goal of the language is to make sure parents are aware of sexually explicit books in school libraries.
Norman and others also argued that the books under attack in some states and communities are those that include explicit sexual content that they say is not appropriate for certain ages and is not a core educational requirement. Norman cited books that talk about kids who are “sexually active from the time I was 6,” or that include “explicit images of oral sex.”
“Parents, is this something you want your children to read?” Norman asked. “Parents, is this something that encourages academics and allows that child to compete in the 21st century?”
Matt Gaetz (R-FL) was joined by four other Republicans who voted against the measure. Gaetz took to Twitter Friday morning to lay out his rationale for opposing the legislation.
From Wokeness to funding to bathrooms to Critical Race Theory, the federal government SHOULD NOT be involved in education.
I don't want to strengthen the federal Department of Education. I want to abolish it.
I don't want Congress more involved in decisions that are best made…
— Rep. Matt Gaetz (@RepMattGaetz) March 24, 2023
From Wokeness to funding to bathrooms to Critical Race Theory, the federal government SHOULD NOT be involved in education.
I don’t want to strengthen the federal Department of Education. I want to abolish it.
I don’t want Congress more involved in decisions that are best made in local school districts. I want the Congress less involved.
Therefore, I voted against today’s Republican bill to establish a federal “Parents Bill of Rights.”
The other four Republicans who voted against the bill were Andy Biggs (R-AZ), Ken Buck (R-CO), Matt Rosendale (R-MT), and Mike Lawler (R-NY).
#ing Rats
Hard to disagree with what Gaetz said
“Hard to disagree with what Gaetz said”
Is it one or the other? Does he have to let the Leftists RUN FREE on our kids until (and unless) he’s able to kill the Dept. of ‘Education’?
Question: Why would Matt Gaetz vote against something like this?
Possible Answer: Because Speaker of the House McCarthy was for it, and Matt still has a (mysterious) bone to pick with Kevin. Matt is still not beyond throwing a road block in front of the Speaker, just for spite.
This may have something to do with a few months back, when Matt Gaetz was being accused of Sex Trafficking a 17 y/o girl. Perhaps Matt thinks the GOP did not fight for him very hard, left him hanging out to dry.
>> Gaetz: I don’t want to strengthen the federal Department of Education. I want to abolish it.
When every Rat votes against, unlikely the DoE is being strengthened. And doubtful this measure would any further preclude the elimination of the DoE.
Interesting.
I can’t say I understand the issue, or even intend to research it.😉
That being said. I get an uncomfortable vibe fro Matt Gaetz.
My .02
I sorta agree with Gaetz on this issue. Once government official are empowered with granting the people a right, then they can also take that right away. Rights of parents should be inherent and endowed upon people by their very existence and the fact that they are the parents of their own children. Unless a parent is causing a known harm to their child and violating a state law, then the federal government has no right to interfere. Parents should be allowed to educate their child as they see fit and to have control of the educational doctrine of their local school system.
There should be no “rights” given by government and passed by laws as to a parent’s rights to have a say-so in their child’s education. It should be a given. I assure you that if such a law is passed, the left will use it to impose certain requirements on parents as to what subject matter their children should be required to learn, including requiring home-schooled children to be indoctrinated in the current LGIBLET choices. That the government giveth, it can also take away.
Gaetz is equivocating.
You can’t have it both ways.
(or maybe he does.)
should be, could be, would be...
I hope every one of those republicans that voted against it gets replaced!
>>Hard to disagree with what Gaetz said<<
Agree. But this was one that was going to happen so might as well get on board.
The time to kill both DOEs when we retake the Presidency the House and the Senate.
Did you even read Matt Gaetz statement/explanation for his vote, at OP??
Or, did you simply knee jerk reply?
I believe Matt’s dad was once a FL School district Superintendent, as well as FL Senate....who pushed laws, beneficial to FL school families, if I read that correctly.
He may have some better insight, than you do, on this.
Just sayin’.
Thank you for the tip, Jane.
I will take a look.
I’m with Gaetz. I think I held that position before he was born.
Be real and be mature about it, BobL, it ain’t passing the Senate and Biden ain’t signing it.
The guy yesterday admitted that China is spying and nothing. Nothing from those clowns.
I think he just prefers Massie’s bill.
The US Dept of EDU shall be terminated.
YW.
Here is a surprisingly positive article...minus the requisite leftist slant, about Don Gaetz, from Polutico....
https://www.politico.com/states/florida/story/2021/04/17/matt-gaetzs-daddy-issues-1375630
Yes....Matt explains this, disbanding the horrid Dept of Education quest, in the OP.
Gaetz has it right, because federal involvement in education — PERIOD — is unconstitutional. If Florida proposed a similar law, I would support it wholeheartedly.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.