Posted on 12/26/2022 8:07:43 AM PST by Dr. Franklin
Pursuant to the court's order, motions for sanctions against Kari Lake and her attorneys were filed this morning in Arizona.https://t.co/extWKCTecU pic.twitter.com/xA1n89bNgu— Marc E. Elias (@marceelias) December 26, 2022
Freaking Brilliant! She’s selling you Kraken and you are buying it. Seriously? Here’s a clue from another kraken sales-chick(in the same article): “Legal experts believe his decision [by Judge Thompson] was ghostwritten, they suspect top left-wing attorneys like Marc Elias emailed him what to say.”
I really hope you don’t choke on this nuclear level BS.
Maybe conservatives need to learn to speak in airy generalities until after they get elected, like Democrats do. Or at least not tip off the criminal element about their plans until they are in a position to execute them.
The judge was bought. Another article of proof that America is shot… done… finished.
How about Sidney Powell?
“How about Sidney Powell?”
Sidney might be willing to take Kari’s case, but it wouldn’t be in Kari’s best interest. The RINOs and MSM have managed to ruin Sidney’s reputation.
Then the Kraken will be released; a few days later everyone will have totally forgotten what all the uproar was all about.
Exactly. He was putting chain-of-custody burden of proof on Lake, when its really up to the SoS to prove they have one by showing it. Its up to the party that was responsible to maintain it to prove that it was intact.
Yeah, but even if Hobbs weren’t SoS, its their job, not the challenger, who didn’t have that job and doesn’t have the records.
“She is a fighter. A real fighter, not a pretend one. This will either be landmark, or nothing. The future of our Republic sort of depends on it, so I am hoping landmark.”
We need fighters who win. Not those who go into the ring and get their face punched in. Nothing will change when so many here support fighters who lose .
Can Hobbs be legally recalled based on the evidence of this trial?
Praying it can/will be done.
“This Judges phone records need to be made public.”
And his financial/banking records.
That sounds like a good idea.
We have longstanding precedent, that despite the laws saying that chain of custody must be maintained for ballots to be valid, that the courts will not set the ballots aside without proof of how many and which ballots are specifically not valid. See Ga 2020, and PA, as examples.
So deliberate obliteration of chain-of-custody is its own reward.
Recalls are a political step, not a legal one. She can be recalled on no more grounds than that enough people think she's ugly. Or are you asking if FReepers think this is sufficient evidence to cause her to lose a recall election?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.