Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kari Lake Announces Her Next Step After Case Dismissed
WeLoveTrump.com ^ | December 26, 2022 | Vince Quill

Posted on 12/26/2022 8:07:43 AM PST by Dr. Franklin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 last
To: Dr. Franklin

Pursuant to the court's order, motions for sanctions against Kari Lake and her attorneys were filed this morning in Arizona.https://t.co/extWKCTecU pic.twitter.com/xA1n89bNgu— Marc E. Elias (@marceelias) December 26, 2022


61 posted on 12/26/2022 12:29:40 PM PST by grey_whiskers ( (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Freaking Brilliant! She’s selling you Kraken and you are buying it. Seriously? Here’s a clue from another kraken sales-chick(in the same article): “Legal experts believe his decision [by Judge Thompson] was ghostwritten, they suspect top left-wing attorneys like Marc Elias emailed him what to say.”

I really hope you don’t choke on this nuclear level BS.


62 posted on 12/26/2022 12:32:35 PM PST by Oystir
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
The minute Lake said she was going to make a Declaration of Invasion right after taking the oath was the minute she had to be destroyed.

Maybe conservatives need to learn to speak in airy generalities until after they get elected, like Democrats do. Or at least not tip off the criminal element about their plans until they are in a position to execute them.

63 posted on 12/26/2022 12:39:48 PM PST by Mr. Jeeves ([CTRL]-[GALT]-[DELETE])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Franklin; All

The judge was bought. Another article of proof that America is shot… done… finished.


64 posted on 12/26/2022 2:18:44 PM PST by Cobra64 (Common sense isn’t common anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam

How about Sidney Powell?


65 posted on 12/26/2022 2:27:24 PM PST by Reynoldo (BurnLootMurder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Reynoldo

“How about Sidney Powell?”

Sidney might be willing to take Kari’s case, but it wouldn’t be in Kari’s best interest. The RINOs and MSM have managed to ruin Sidney’s reputation.


66 posted on 12/26/2022 2:35:58 PM PST by MayflowerMadam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Franklin

Then the Kraken will be released; a few days later everyone will have totally forgotten what all the uproar was all about.


67 posted on 12/26/2022 2:38:24 PM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Exactly. He was putting chain-of-custody burden of proof on Lake, when its really up to the SoS to prove they have one by showing it. Its up to the party that was responsible to maintain it to prove that it was intact.


68 posted on 12/26/2022 3:29:24 PM PST by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking
Exactly. He was putting chain-of-custody burden of proof on Lake, when its really up to the SoS to prove they have one by showing it. Its up to the party that was responsible to maintain it to prove that it was intact.

The fact that Hobbs was running the election and had an obvious conflict of interest makes this argument laughable. Hobbs should need to prove that she followed the law to name herself governor.
69 posted on 12/26/2022 3:45:23 PM PST by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Franklin

Yeah, but even if Hobbs weren’t SoS, its their job, not the challenger, who didn’t have that job and doesn’t have the records.


70 posted on 12/26/2022 4:54:55 PM PST by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: FLNittany

“She is a fighter. A real fighter, not a pretend one. This will either be landmark, or nothing. The future of our Republic sort of depends on it, so I am hoping landmark.”

We need fighters who win. Not those who go into the ring and get their face punched in. Nothing will change when so many here support fighters who lose .


71 posted on 12/26/2022 5:59:47 PM PST by Armscor38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Franklin

Can Hobbs be legally recalled based on the evidence of this trial?

Praying it can/will be done.


72 posted on 12/26/2022 7:42:27 PM PST by Reddy (BO stinks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Colo9250

“This Judges phone records need to be made public.”

And his financial/banking records.


73 posted on 12/26/2022 8:09:22 PM PST by MayflowerMadam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
Maybe conservatives need to learn to speak in airy generalities until after they get elected, like Democrats do. Or at least not tip off the criminal element about their plans until they are in a position to execute them.

That sounds like a good idea.

74 posted on 12/26/2022 8:13:39 PM PST by Irish Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

We have longstanding precedent, that despite the laws saying that chain of custody must be maintained for ballots to be valid, that the courts will not set the ballots aside without proof of how many and which ballots are specifically not valid. See Ga 2020, and PA, as examples.


75 posted on 12/27/2022 12:57:02 AM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: lepton

So deliberate obliteration of chain-of-custody is its own reward.


76 posted on 12/27/2022 4:49:57 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (The worst thing about censorship is ████ █ ██████ ███████ ███ ██████ ██ ████████.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Reddy
Can Hobbs be legally recalled based on the evidence of this trial?

Recalls are a political step, not a legal one. She can be recalled on no more grounds than that enough people think she's ugly. Or are you asking if FReepers think this is sufficient evidence to cause her to lose a recall election?

77 posted on 12/28/2022 2:52:38 PM PST by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson