Judicial Watch, here's a redacted copy of the warrant you requested:
He ordered DOJ to respond to the request to unseal.
He didn’t order DOJ to unseal it.
It will be redacted.
A black page.
Everybody and their brother is running for cover.
This backfired spectacularly and now nobody knew it was coming but it came from somewhere. I’m guessing St. Jugears the stutterer.
Leftards are oh so clever.
So they have to file a Response to the Motion To Unseal, but that filing may be sealed and even if they’re force to unseal the warrant, all we’ll get is a heavily redacted version. Useless exercise.
The judge did NOT say that the FBI must release the warrant. The judge said only that the government must file a written response to the motion arguing that the warrant should be released. One side files something with the court, the other side responds, and then the court makes a decision.
It is truly pathetic that so many of these bloggers get this kind of stuff wrong all the time. Nothing wrong with blogging, but if you're going to do it, you really should limit it to stuff on which you actually have some level of expertise.
Reporting is so imprecise these days. Does this mean that the order (warrant) to seize certain things is to be released; or, is it the affidavit (the justification) for the warrant request is to be released?
I don’t trust any of this Rat kabuki theater of corruption and deceptions.
Trump is right over target
There is Hope
If our situation were hopeless ...
They wouldn’t bother lying
They wouldn’t persecute dissent
They wouldn’t be pushing so hard
This is a standard response by the magistrate to that motion.
The Justice Department will respond with a sealed response to the magistrate, and a redacted public response that says "the warrant is required to remain sealed because *REDACTED*.
The only logical reason why the warrant was sealed is because the FBI has a confidential informant inside the Trump organization who gave them the information used to justify the warrant, and the FIB wanted to not only shield the identity of their CI, but to shield very the existence of a CI from the Trump team.
If the warrant is unsealed, it will show something like "based on firsthand information from Joe Blow, it is our belief that x and y can be found in the Trump private quarters." Then Trump would know that his employee Joe Blow is an FIB confidential informant, and that FBI asset would be burned.
It could also be that one of the Secret Service detail is the CI, which would be embarrassing for Homeland Security.
If he jails Wray for contempt if Wray refuses to comply, then I will be convinced
Judicial Watch Files Motion to Unseal FBI Search Warrant Used to Raid President Trump’s Mar-a-Lago Home
Judge Orders DOJ to Respond to Judicial Watch’s Motion to Unseal Mar-a-Lago Search Warrant Materials by 5p.m. EST on August 15
https://www.judicialwatch.org/judge-orders-doj-unseal-mar-a-lago-search-warrant/
Rather than incoherent media accounts, go to the actual source of the motion to unseal.
More BS from the Gateway Pundit. How many times are you people gonna fall for their crap?
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/07/28/bidens-dollar-plan-a-deeply-troubling-development/
Judicial Watch, here's a redacted copy of the warrant you requested:
An interesting turn of events!
It’s CYA time for the magistrate.
Meaningless because redactions are allowed.
How is it possible that in a country of 330 million people,
The guy, who approved the Trump warrant!:
Is the same guy who:
-donated to Obama
-represented Epstein’s gang
-circled the wagons for Lois Lerner
-presided over Trump v Clinton
-had to recuse himself from Trump v Clinton?
The lefties are saying the DOJ asked to unseal it because Trump wouldn’t.
Did Trump even get it?