Judicial Watch, here's a redacted copy of the warrant you requested:
Posted on 08/11/2022 7:54:30 AM PDT by Macho MAGA Man
The former Jeffrey Epstein attorney and current judge who signed off on the FBI warrant to raid President Trump’s personal residence is now ordering the FBI to release the warrant by August 15.
..... Snip.....
The judge overseeing the case, U.S. Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart, quickly directed the U.S. Department of Justice to respond to Judicial Watch’s motion to unseal by the end of next Monday, Aug. 15, 2022.
“[T]he Government shall file a Response to the Motion to Unseal,” the judge wrote in the docket entry immediately following the motion. “The response may be filed ex parte and under seal as necessary to avoid disclosing matters already under seal. In that event, the Government shall file a redacted Response in the public record.”
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
They broke into the safe, which the Trump people have said "had nothing in it".
Wouldn't it be a hoot if the CI said the material was in the safe, and the FBI broke into an empty safe?
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/07/28/bidens-dollar-plan-a-deeply-troubling-development/
Wray should have been jail years ago
Judicial Watch, here's a redacted copy of the warrant you requested:
They aren't morons, they're very sophisticated manipulators who know exactly which buttons to push to get clicks and donations.
Hoft and Fitton have turned it into an art.
I believe that is why they were there for 9 hours!! I think this was supposed to be a smash and grab operation but they got Punked!!
An interesting turn of events!
It’s CYA time for the magistrate.
Wonder if protestors are on his front lawn.
Meaningless because redactions are allowed.
They still need to publish WHAT they were supposedly looking for, even if the name of who told them is redacted.
Lmao 🤣
Many bloggers must abide by the Moronic Code, post anything and everything for traffic, and don’t bother to get anything correct.
Yup, not an order to unseal. In fact, he had no choice but to respond to the lawful request under the rules for the subject of the search to request it be unsealed.
Hum, let me think about the response something like, not now, or not ever, or I’ll let you know.
How is it possible that in a country of 330 million people,
The guy, who approved the Trump warrant!:
Is the same guy who:
-donated to Obama
-represented Epstein’s gang
-circled the wagons for Lois Lerner
-presided over Trump v Clinton
-had to recuse himself from Trump v Clinton?
It would be a double hoot if Trump said to a particular someone he suspected of being a CI "I hope the FIB never looks in my safe, because if they do they'll lock me up and throw away the key with the information they find inside."
Since they looked in the safe, now Trump knows who the rat is.
hmm ...maybe?
What’s the consequences if he doesn’t CYA?
Consequences for federal judge malfeasance seems to be very rare. The only thing that the “establishment” might pay attention to is out and out bribery. Even then maybe not!
To remove a federal judge, he/she must be impeached/convicted in the senate same rules apply to them as a president/VP. So where are the votes coming from?
Reinhart is a federal magistrate judge. They are hired by a panel of federal district court judges and serve a limited term of years. They are not nominated by the president or approved by the Senate. They can be fired for cause or simply not rehired when their terms end. Impeachment not necessary.
“it came from somewhere”
There’s a whole cabal of “by any means necessary” Trump haters in the DOJ,still looking for any way to prevent him from running.
They practice Lawfare, and are guided from the outside by Mark Elias. Same Elias guiding Weisman, under Meuller. Petty crimes, but dozens of them. Shotgun mud tactic.
Thos is ALL Elias, working his insiders at DOJ. They actually think they can convince a jury Trump broke a minor law, so can’t run again. Unfortunately, they have corrupt judges and tainted jury pool in DC, so if they get that far, they may succeed.
It would be overturned, but might be too late for 2024.
Someone needs to go talk to Elias. That is the key to this whole shebang.
“The response may be filed ex parte and under seal as necessary to avoid disclosing matters already under seal. In that event, the Government shall file a redacted Response in the public record.”
Why is it people can NOT read?
My Gawd!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.