Posted on 07/07/2022 12:50:58 PM PDT by MNDude
On the eve of the January 6th protests, a middle-aged man in a MAGA hat showed up, defended Antifa, and told the crowd they needed to “go into the Capitol” on Jan. 6. The man made the demands while standing next to Antifa organizer John Sullivan.
Revolver’s latest investigation breaks down the timeline of events on 1/6 and highlights the network of still-unindicted operators who appear to have been at work either with or in response to Ray Epps during the initial breach into Capitol grounds.
Unsurprisingly, none of the suspicious individuals who led the charge have received any attention from law enforcement officials, the mainstream press, or even Pelosi’s sham witch hunt committee, despite mounting video evidence of their coordinated and indispensable roles in starting the incident at the Capitol.
The new report again centers around the suspicious actions of Ray Epps, who is proving to be more involved than even originally thought, but he doesn’t seem to have been acting alone.
It’s called the “Ray Epps breach theory,” and it might just be the key to solving what really happened on 1/6.
As has been reported- On the night before 1/6, Epps made his plans to breach the US Capitol building very clear – on video multiple times, at multiple locations. The next morning, he spent hours instructing others to go to the Capitol.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
wait till the courts get this one!
Read what you wrote again. 🤔😅
Wonder when the Feds will permanently close this lose end.
If it goes all the way to SCOTUS we might have a chance. Of course, this is the same SCOTUS that refused to look at the voter cheating. But it’s also the same SCOTUS that lately has been honoring this thing called the Constitution.
The corruption is so broad and so deep that only God can fix it.
There aren't enough "Good Guys" to replace all of the "Bad Guys", no matter who is Prez.
Where is Lizard on this?
“WHAT ARE THEY HIDING? DOJ Denies FOIA Request on Ray Epps and
Why He Was Removed From FBI Most Wanted List”
~~~~~~~
They are hiding their Treason and protecting their own.
(and doing a rather poor job of it.)
A Republican Controlled with an actual American as Speaker and Senate Majority leader that actually give a damn about LAW and what is the right thing to do. Yes that leaves out McCarthy and McConnell, how about Donald J Trump as speaker
No witness is privileged to refuse to testify to any fact, or to produce any paper, respecting which he shall be examined by either House of Congress, or by any joint committee established by a joint or concurrent resolution of the two Houses of Congress, or by any committee of either House, upon the ground that his testimony to such fact or his production of such paper may tend to disgrace him or otherwise render him infamous.”
Simply look up Hinds Precedents, especially chapters 53 and 51, and Cannon’s Precedents, especially chapters 184-185. You’ll find numerous detailed cases of Congress asserting its power, arresting people, holding them until they agreed to answer questions, and then releasing them. Some of these people did not refuse to appear, but simply failed to satisfactorily answer questions.
Congress has the authority to arrest and imprison those found in Contempt. The power extends throughout the United States and is an inherent power (does not depend upon legislated act)
If found in Contempt the person can be arrested under a warrant of the Speaker of the House of Representatives or President of the Senate, by the respective Sergeant at Arms.
Statutory criminal contempt is an alternative to inherent contempt.
Under the inherent contempt power Congress may imprison a person for a specific period of time or an indefinite period of time, except a person imprisoned by the House of Representatives may not be imprisoned beyond adjournment of a session of Congress.
Imprisonment may be coercive or punitive.
Some references
[1] Joseph Story’s Commentaries on the Constitution, Volume 2, § 842 http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/print_documents/a1_5s21.html
[2] Anderson v. Dunn - 19 U.S. 204 - “And, as to the distance to which the process might reach, it is very clear that there exists no reason for confining its operation to the limits of the District of Columbia; after passing those limits, we know no bounds that can be prescribed to its range but those of the United States.” http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/19/204/case.html
[3] Jurney v. MacCracken, 294 U.S. 125 http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/294/125/case.html 73rd Cong., 78 Cong. Rec. 2410 (1934) https://archive.org/details/congressionalrec78aunit
[4] McGrain v. Daugherty, 273 U.S. 135 - Under a warrant issued by the President of the Senate the Deputy to the Senate Sergeant at Arms arrested at Cincinnati, Ohio, Mally S. Daugherty, who had been twice subpoenaed by the Senate and twice failed to appear. http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/273/135/case.html
[5] Rules of the House of Representatives, Rule IV Duties of the Sergeant at Arms - [] execute the commands of the House, and all processes issued by authority thereof, directed to him by the Speaker. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/HMAN-105/pdf/HMAN-105-pg348.pdf
[6] An analysis of Congressional inquiry, subpoena, and enforcement http://www.constitutionproject.org/documents/when-congress-comes-calling-a-primer-on-the-principles-practices-and-pragmatics-of-legislative-inquiry/
In 1857, a New York Times reporter refused to say which members of Congress had asked him to get them bribes (protecting his “sources” just as various Judith Millers today protect the people who feed them proven lies that costs thousands of lives), so Congress locked him up until he answered and then banned him from Congress.
In 1924 an oil executive appeared but refused to answer certain questions, so the Senate held — literally held — him in contempt. Senator Thomas Walsh of Montana argued that this question of contempt was of the gravest importance, and that it involved “the very life of the effective existence of the House of Representatives of the United States and of the Senate of the United States.” The matter was taken to court, and the witness fined and imprisoned.
A Republican Controlled with an actual American as Speaker and Senate Majority leader that actually give a damn about LAW and what is the right thing to do. Yes that leaves out McCarthy and McConnell, how about Donald J Trump as speaker
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
isn’t that the same congressional majority trump inherited when he took office??
Lol. So one sided.
How come you neglect to fill out the the field for the author?
Is it because the author is Jim Hoft?
Are you ashamed of Jim Hoft and would rather keep it secret?
Is that because Jim Hoft is a homo with a young Filipino boy “wife”?
To ask the question, is to answer it…
“Ongoing investigation” my arse.
https://www.revolver.news/2021/12/damning-new-details-massive-web-unindicted-operators-january-6/
but you left that spot blank? Are you ASHAMED of Miss Hoft?
Would you rather folks not know that Hoft wrote this?
Is there something about Hoft you would rather folks not know?
Surely there is some REASON why you decided not to disclose that Hoft wrote this.
What is that?
Ray Epps = Entrapment Expert
One of many for the party
Must keep the false flag hidden......
Huh?
Did the NKVD ever care about a court order?
Did the Gestapo?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.