Here are many examples of voter fraud in the 2020 U.S. Presidential election that, as far as I’m aware, have not been debunked. Updated for June 23, 2022.

Wordpress ^ | June 23, 2022 | Dan from Squirrel Hill

[Cboldt]

Res ipsa loquitur

[glimmerman70]

Great post. There was more than enough evidence which is maybe why a few wanted Trump to have the election taken over by military for investigation. But Trump had no idea how deep the corruption went. The media and social media helped hide it. The dems denied and republicans turned there backs. The judges refused to look at it. So the miltary May have done the same thing. If they did look into it or if barr did his job it would have cleaned the swamp out.

[bert]

So What?

This is all bitch and moan

If there was fraud, why are the election fraudsters still walking around? why are the election fraudsters still alive?

[grobdriver]

Holy cow!

Good work.

[hecticskeptic]

What a mammoth bit of work! It would be great if all those links stay active but obviously, due diligence needs to be done to preserve in perpetuity what is there.

[Pollard]

You should make this your profile page.

[ml/nj]

self ping

[Still Thinking]

Quod erat demonstrandum!

[Tymesup]

Self ping squared

[combat_boots]

AZ new

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/06/maricopa-county-republican-committee-executive-board-reject-2020-presidential-election-election-audit-2000-mules-documentary-prove-irrefutable-evidence-fraud/

[Still Thinking]

Come to think of it, Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

Is there a Latin phrase that doesn't fit the 2020 selection?

[Cboldt]

https://parade.com/1247077/marynliles/latin-phrases/

[patriotfury]

No future election will be other than deceptive theater -

[Observator]

The idea of a thread tracking voter fraud theories that have not been disproven is good. I read through the list and have a couple suggestions, in case you're interested.

• Number the theories to provide coherence. It is a big wall of text that many will immediately discount based on the lack of organization.
• Focus on sources - the closer you can get to factual, primary data, the more convincing. Gateway Pundit for example is not a credible source.
• Consider removing theories that rely purely on innuendo.

I'll follow up some of the items you listed that I think shouldn't be there as time permits. For a start, here's one that is badly sourced, is based on innuendo, and doesn't sound credible: SQL found on voting machines in Pennsylvania and Michigan indicated that election data could be manipulated.

SQL is a database programming language. Reading the Gateway Pundit article, what they actually mean is Microsoft's SQL Server Management Studio. That clarification is important, since an application that uses SQL itself is SOP. The presence of a visual management tool is not good practice, but as the article mentions, requires admin access to change data. It's definitely not evidence of voter fraud by itself. It's highly likely that voting software uses change tracking - at any rate this doesn't prove anything.

[Observator]

Mainstream media reported that Fulton County, Georgia, “stopped” counting ballots for the night because “a water pipe has broken,” and “sent the ballot counters home.”

Video shows Republican poll watchers and media reporters leaving the building.

The same video shows a few people remain, and continue counting votes without Republican poll watchers or media reporters.

Video shows an election worker scanning the same ballots three times.

There is no visible water in these videos.

Several problems here.

1. The first link you provided is repeated a second time.
2. Two separate events got combined on both MSM and social media immediately after the election, and both distinct events were misreported by themselves. The water main break was actually a leaking urinal. Regardless of the plumbing specifics, it was addressed (on video) on Nov. 3 at 6am. Completely separate from the GA election workers on video.
3. About 17 hours later, at about 10:15 PM the GA workers began wrapping up tabulation. This was a separate event from #2, although both things were intermingled on social media. All of these events are available on video and have been reviewed by authorities, Republicans and Democrats.
4. OAN, who reported erroneously on several details, was sued by the GA election workers, and posted a retraction in May and paid them a settlement.
5. The videotape of the GA election workers was not doctored, but was selectively edited. It begins after they believed they were done counting for the night, and they had placed ballots in a secure container. Note the video on social media only begins at this point, when the full video includes them placing the ballots in this container, then pulling it back out when they were told to get back to work.
6. The poll monitors were not ordered to leave, they simply left on their own because they had been watching all day and were done. They were not legally required to be there. The entire count is recorded on video.
7. Scanning a ballot multiple times is required when ballots don't process. There was a complete manual recount of the ballots that almost exactly matched the machine counts.

The bottom line is that no one making these accusations has testified under oath. Whereas Republican officials overseeing the matter have, submitted affidavits, and a media outlet making accusations has already retracted. This theory rests heavily on mixed-up facts, selective video edits and has no one willing to put themselves under oath on the accusatory side, while those that did at the time have already retracted. So this one is pretty much disproven, or at best, severely under water.

[Observator]

Five videos – Five states where votes were switched live on TV away from President Trump to Biden.

I'm not sure why this one made the list. Are you thinking that any time voting totals swing from one candidate to the other that indicates fraud?

That's obviously not the case. Early totals may be weighted to urban centers - that's why FL often starts the evening in the blue and ends in the red.

On the other side, and in 2020 in particular, in-person votes tilted Republican while mail-in ballots tilted Democrat. And of course the in-person votes hit the tabulation earlier.

[deport]

and in 2020 in particular, in-person votes tilted Republican

********

IMO that is probably true. But keep in mind the mail voting
due to Covid 19 was a major influence also. People were boxed
in and many still not working and lots of businesses still down.
The situation was prime for voter manipulation JMO.

[Observator]

But keep in mind the mail voting due to Covid 19 was a major influence also.

Agreed, more people on both sides (including Trump) voted by mail.

60% of Dems voted by mail in 2020, 32% Republicans.

[grundle]

Are you thinking that any time voting totals swing from one candidate to the other that indicates fraud?

No. I'm not talking about the winner switching from one party to another. Instead, I am talking about votes being subtracted from one candidate and being added to the the other. This happened nine times, and all nine times, it was the Republican who had voted removed - never the Democrat. If these were honest mistakes, we would expect approximately half of these incidents to be removing votes from the Democrat.

[deport]

Agreed, more people on both sides (including Trump) voted by mail.

***********

We voted much like a normal election. They had the machines
set up in a Mall. You went in, showed your voter info, ID and
was directed to a person to log you in then you went to a machine
and voted. Normal process as far as I could tell.