Posted on 05/25/2022 12:13:19 PM PDT by Macho MAGA Man
According to Governor Abbott, 18-year-old Salvador Ramos posted 3 status updates to his Facebook page warning of the attacks shortly before killing 21 people and shooting his grandmother in the face.
30 minutes before the shootings, he wrote the following:
– “I’m going to shoot my grandmother.” – “I shot my grandmother.” – “I’m going to shoot an elementary school.”
According to reports, Ramos’ grandmother is still alive and in critical condition.
Ramos also posted photos to Instagram before he carried out the deadly shooting.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
So, basically, trannies and cross dressers do have serious mental illness like everyone knew just 10-20 years ago - and the left has blood on their hands for pushing this insane degeneracy and pushing more kids into mental illness.
bingo
Criticize Global Warming in a post and Facebook is “tagging “ your post in microseconds, post a domestic terror threat and maybe they’ll get around to alerting someone.
Somebody “sponsored” the shooting? Or he had secret sources of income?
I have been censored within seconds for an incorrect comment on FB several times. I no longer use that place.
That being said, they saw nothing wrong with what he wrote? I got a 30 day suspension for saying Russia Russia Russia was a hoax. It literally took 30 seconds.
Oh yea that’s right, FBI DIDN’T REACT. Shooter didn’t fit the typical White Supremacist narrative.
Hispanics can only be victims of crimes according to FBI methodology. If a Hispanic commits a crime, it's committed by a white person.
So Facebook alerted no one
cuz they were too busy doing more important things
like censoring moms against CRT and grade school curriculum porn ?
Just the mere idea that you're sharing FB space with a murderous tranny should pretty much be the CLUE, with a goddamn blinking red light and siren, to get the f. off. FB.
Talking about facebook. Don’t get all spooly about vaccinations, please.
The guy was a fag, so......
Where’s the gender confused or is that made up BS.
As a general comment, if he was gender confused that should be pointed out as an indicator of metal illness and incipient violent tendencies. Heh, chew on that, trannys.
The major fault is not the trash kid, his homelife, hsi getting a gun, yada, yada, yada.
Why was the school not guarded? What, no teachers in a Tx school don’t have a gun and willing to carry? A copper was not on site during all school hours?
This was the political failure and ought to be emphasized. This could have been stopped.
Oh, I didn't see the FB reference in your post.
Don’t get all spooly about vaccinations, please.
Spooly??
I'm not the one who brought them up. You did.
I was just trying to make the connection, in your post.
Don't get *all spooly* (??) over that.
I bet he didn’t even get a time out..
I said on Facebook “you shoot at me, I shoot back”
got a 30 day ban in 5 minutes.
they reacted to my comment “you shoot at me, I shoot back” in less than 5 minutes with a 30 day ban.
With the 5 minutes later take down/suspended line, I think the original poster was sarcastically noting how quickly they (the content monitors at the social media websites) react to politically incorrect/disfavored content but somehow are asleep at the switch when an actual threat to shoot up a school was posted.
Posting “(Crickets)” as a final line would have helped.
Not sure if the chain of events would have been that much different even if the content monitoring algorithms had alerted on the threats the killer had posted.
Just think through all the safeguards that would need to be in-place to prevent accidental (or deliberate) spoofing of the the AI monitoring system by some poster just blowing off their anger. Once satisfied the threat is 1) real, and 2) serious, the location of the threatening person needs to be determined, and, once that is done, the chain of emergency LE notifications begun. Finally, the lock down notification has to be received and acted upon at the school. Seen in this context, 30 minutes is not a long time.
Protective measure, criminal countermeasure ad infinitum. The shooters in the last two mass shooting incidents wore body armor
That is not an argument against improving security at schools but let’s not limit it to just schools. Any place where groups of disarmed persons are required to congregate presents an equally attractive target. And better steps to make such concentrations safe need to be taken.
Society also has to be clear eyed about the continuing costs of such an approach. If you want 24/7/365 coverage by trained professionals and a secure facility, you’ve got to pay for it somehow.
Society also needs to admit the problem isn’t the gun/knife/weapon, it’s the individual. Restricting access to guns does not constrain those determined to harm others. There have been mass stabbings at schools in China and in the streets of downtown Tokyo and incidents in France and Sweden involving delivery trucks. There needs to be a change in the unwillingness of society to deal with persons manifesting apparently dangerous behavioral or psychological problems.
And that brings us full circle back to social media since these are the forums where many of these troubled people first begin manifesting their issues. How soon do you begin reacting to posted texts, pictures, and images? What happens to individual rights when the system is tripped? Can a reactive legal system be retooled to be proactive?
Answering these questions will be far tougher than hiring more SROs and hardening school entrances.
“So what I want to know is since people that knew him are saying he was dirt poor, where did he get the money to buy the 3k + guns? Did someone give him the money? If so, who? ”
*****************
An excellent question of which I have seen no analysis. The Cartels are using young legals to run their illegals into the interior of the country. And, they’re paying about $1,000 per head to do this. So, he could have been running illegals. Another possibility could be he was running drugs for the Cartels. In order to become a trusted soldier in a cartel one must be willing to commit a horrific crime - such as kill one’s grandmother or murder 19 young children. One of these such scenarios are plausible to me.
Me: Talking about facebook.
Jane Long: Oh, I didn’t see the FB reference in your post.
Me: Don’t get all spooly about vaccinations, please.
Jane: Spooly?? I’m not the one who brought them up. You did.
I was just trying to make the connection, in your post.
Don’t get *all spooly* (??) over that.
I was saying that a post about harmful vaccinations gets deleted immediately on FB. But a post saying “I’m going to kill my grandmother” then “I killed my grandmother” gets no attention. I follow two people on FB and I don’t think I have more than a couple of followers. I posted something critical of Pfizer and I checked the same day and it had been deleted as “misinformation.”
But miscreants typically post threats and “I did this” type posts including snuff videos where someone actually gets killed. If people are reporting it, it doesn’t get deleted or acted upon.
My OP was like a little fantasy scenario about what typically happens if you post something critical of Pfizer or one of the other drug companies, or the “vaccines.”
I hope this is enough of an explanation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.