Posted on 05/09/2022 11:51:06 AM PDT by bitt
The premiere of the much-anticipated movie ‘2000 Mules’ was held last week in theaters across the country and in a virtual premiere online on Saturday night.
In the film, Dinesh D’Souza and True the Vote investigators provide answers and evidence on the stolen 2020 Election.
True the Vote investigators Catherine Engelbrecht and Gregg Phillips have identified over 2000 ballot trafficking mules in all of the battleground states. These “mules” deposited hundreds of thousands of ballots into ballot drop boxes during the 2020 election. The ballot fraud scheme produced enough ballots to steal the election for Joe Biden.
According to the evidence discussed in the movie, if you factor in just the identified ballot trafficking, Trump won with 305 electoral votes. That does not even count all the other fraud that occurred during the election like the mysterious ballot drops at 3 in the morning or the questionable voting machines.
The movie discusses the Democrat-linked stash houses but does not mention any names or locations.
On Saturday Catherine Engelbrecht and Gregg Phillips announced they will be releasing ALL of the addresses of the ballot stash houses. Look for the Democrats to squirm.
Now this… Following the release of “2000 Mules” last week something peculiar took place in Wisconsin. The Wisconsin Election Commission (WEC) took down its voter roll list of all the 7.2 million names on the state’s voter rolls.
Wisconsin voter fraud investigator Jefferson Davis reached out to WEC after his team noticed this sudden development. Here is his letter to WEC:
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
p
Get a court order and get that list back in public!
Now!
Bttt.
5.56mm
Can’t have people doing actual investigations now, can we...
The left will take it as seriously as I too Inconvenient Truth.
You can’t win a battle you refuse to fight and republicans have shown over and over that they won’t fight.
Morons, this play simply makes them look like the corrupt, complicit, lying cheaters they are.
The historical data exists and can be accessed through FOIA requests. Nothing they do can stop the investigation should one occur. They must feel pretty panicked.
Thou protests too much.
No reason to assume the people cheating then are cheating now. None.
Are you a conspiracy theorist?
Republicans are more interesting in becoming career politicians.
Got them running scared now.
Smells like obstruction of justice to me.
Fun fact: As of 2020, Wisconsin has only 5,893,718 residents. 22.7% of that number are under 18 and not qualified to vote (about 1.338 million), so that means if every person over 18 was qualified to vote, only 4.555 million (and that would also include both unregistered and felons) would be. That means you still have 2.7 million more voters on the roles than could be qualified, that's almost 60% more (and again, even higher than that when you exclude the aforementioned unregistered and felons). Sounds like there needs to be a massive investigation into these voter rolls.
Any media enterprise not looking into this is fake news because there is evidence that there is a fake President and they are not even curious.
You can’t push this off the news. They are simply not covering it because they aren’t actually news outlets.
Watched 2000 Mules.
I believe the election was stolen, no doubt. The theft must be addressed, and criminals must be punished.
But contrary to the reviews from our side about 2000, I didn’t think it was an effective or compelling movie.
Large segments of the movie are static talking heads, often pointless talking. D’Souza wandering. The movie has the overall feeling of pointless padding to get it to an hour and 26 minutes.
The most fundamental point of the movie is illegality, but the first time that is mentioned is half way through, and it is fleetingly mentioned without clarification. The deadly assumption throughout (and I am being charitable calling it an assumption) is that the wrong-doing speaks for itself.
Some concrete examples are presented late in the movie, but they are singular and are not inconsistent with the (IMO mistaken) attitude that fraud always takes place but it is insignificant, and cannot be shown to have affected the results. The concrete examples feel tacked on, mere suggestions as to how they might relate to the larger issue of ballot stuffing.
The legal question should have been addressed up front: in what precise way will this movie prove legal wrongdoing?
The technical aspects came upfront and were mostly superfluous.
And the opinions of the opinionators was pointless, superfluous and boring. But they came upfront, too, as well as later.
Debbie was a personal add-in, also pointless.
The movie was poorly organized and poorly edited.
This is why our side always loses. We do not have the skill to make things interesting or compelling to anyone but the already committed, who do not demand much.
This could have been a powerful movie. But no normie will sit to watch this poor movie.
Good for our side... Let's get out as much as possible before Ministry Of Truth goons starts lowing their boot...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.