Posted on 05/05/2022 10:38:07 AM PDT by jeff_clark
Bloomberg News had the audacity to claim that overturning the abortion-sanctioning Roe v. Wade (1973) is erasing women’s “economic gains.”
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
*scratches head*
What a load of claptrap. So many bizarre connections between abortion and life successes of women. Who knew? /sarc
Bloomberg…money is more important than life…
Remaining comment deleted
Utter nonsense
1) Collect reeds and fronds.
2) Have a hen party.
3) Profit!
ABORTION IS NOT BIRTH CONTROL!!
Gee....birth control pills are CHEAP! Maybe that’s the problem...there is no money in it compared to murdering babies and funneling the money to the rats.
Guys, the abortion issue is being used as a means to kill MAGA. Gramnesty said as much when he ranted that any Republican that would leak the decision draft is a traitor to the cause, and any Democrat that would leak is just stupid.
Sure, the Democrat would be stupid because this is a winning issue for them, whereas the Republicans are all supposed to all line up behind all-or-nothing social issue positions with a 20% approval rating that are attached to any candidate that campaigns on closing the border and bringing manufacturing jobs back to the U.S.A.
I’m going to invest in cat food and boxed wine.
Lots of sluts futures are being prepared.
“Hey, I’ve had six abortions and have had 57 men inside me. Do you want to get married to me and have your children?”…
I'm not a Christian, but if Jesus IS coming back, I hope he sends all these monsters not to a hell, but to a purgatory from which there is no escape and horror for eternity.
Why do I say that as an agnostic? Because human beings are the greatest souls on this rock, if there even others as some claim. We alone can create a da Vinci , a Mozart, a computer wristband, a rocket to the moon, a Rolling Stones, etc. Hell, a LIGHT BULB!
Well we are in a recession...
Payoffs in someway to mattress backs like Kamala Harris. I’ve always wondered how she didn’t get pregnant as she put all those notches on her bedpost as she panted her way up the ladder. Now if she did get pregnant what would she......
Food for thought- isn’t quite hysterical the same people now claiming overturning Roe v Wade would set women back “half a century” remained silent, and even applauded, as marginal men claim they are women, compete in women’s sports and win titles they couldn’t as men????
Sure, successful women always used abortion instead of contraception. / [S]
Well, Biden and the hateful idiots who are ‘advising’ him have erased a significant amount of my economic gains.
Decades of wage slavery is more like it. Working women for the most part are a major part of the cheap labor express. This is not about equal pay for equal work but about the types of jobs most women do (for one reason or another).
Ask yourself have any of the companies chiming in with offers of easy access to abortion also offered support for more generous maternal leave policies? I have not seen anything. I guess the real issue is the company’s labor costs. Not women’s choices.
I have given this matter great thought. I have no doubt that leaking this info, IF TRUE, was a plan to give liberals/Dems something to throw at the Republicans.
“The Republicans are going to force a 14 year old girl made pregnant by her father to bear and birth the child,” they will shout.
“Republicans will make you have a rapists’ baby!” goes more shouting.
“It’s a woman’s body. Men have no input!” more typical abortion rants.
And hey, folks, if I do not bore yon readers, but some of the things I listed above ARE a problem. Will a young girls impregnated by a relative or a rapist be forced to bear the child to birth?
Now I know that these types of pregnancies are less than a one/thousandth percent of all abortions but it’s a difficult argument to make. What you going to say?: “Look, I am sorry your father molested you like he did but that baby inside of you IS a living human and to abort it will land you in jail.”
But of course the answers should be left to the citizens, better...the citizens close to the voting representatives. Let the citizens vote for a limit before an abortion can NOT be performed. Let the citizens vote for exceptions to banned abortions should it be legal in their state....but let the rule be any woman who got pregnant by rape can have an abortion upon request...and you can believe any woman who wants to over-ride any abortion ban will claim rape.
I’m done as I may have bored.
Frankly, and bear in mind I am not the Supreme Court, but by me, a woman should be able to have an abortion at any point in a pregnancy up to three months. Let God decide who the sinners are.
Some tricky problems here.
Women murdering their babies is an economic gain?
No Proggie or Democrat would want this decision leaked before the maximum number of primaries were over. If anything, they would have done everything in their power to slow-walk this decision until the GOP was stuck with the maximum number of no-exception six-week-abortion candidates so their candidates could then spend all their time campaigning against an issue with a 20% maximum approval rating instead of having to defend open borders, rampant inflation, and CRT.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.