Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FOX News Joins Mainstream Media in Boycotting Coverage of “2000 Mules” Documentary on Nation-wide Ballot Trafficking Conspiracy to Steal 2020 Election
The Gateway Pundit ^ | May 4, 2022 | Jim Hoft

Posted on 05/04/2022 6:36:00 AM PDT by Macho MAGA Man

The movie ‘2000 Mules’ is set for release this week in over 200 theaters across the country.

In the film, Dinesh D’Souza and True the Vote provide answers and evidence of the stolen 2020 Election in this documentary released on Tuesday at select theaters across the nation.

...... Snip......

We already know from our sources that the evidence from Georgia will ROCK the corrupt Democrat Party to its core.

Sadly, FOX News failed to post ONE SINGLE REPORT on “2000 Mules.” Not one.

This is a huge disappointment. FOX News is too weak to air ANY coverage on the movie. Their brilliant personalities can talk about all issues except the most importan issue — fraudulent elections. And without free and fair elections Republicans will always take a backseat on the bus. Just how Democrats like it.

(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: 2000mules; corruptmedia; fakewaypundit; foxnewstrump; hoftalert; stolenelection
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 last
To: mewzilla

Excellent, I was just going to post that Trump should play it at one of his rallies! This will make the MSM go nuts. Haha.


61 posted on 05/04/2022 8:03:32 AM PDT by dandiegirl (BOBBY m)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: moovova

Varney had him on in his program on Fox business news.


62 posted on 05/04/2022 8:04:03 AM PDT by Vaduz ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

They have also largely stopped reporting on the Ukraine war. Now it abortion all day, all night.


63 posted on 05/04/2022 8:14:15 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; BraveMan; cardinal4; ...

64 posted on 05/04/2022 8:31:34 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

+1.


65 posted on 05/04/2022 8:36:19 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Bttt.

5.56mm


66 posted on 05/04/2022 8:37:15 AM PDT by M Kehoe (Quid Pro Joe and the Ho need to go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: william clark; XRdsRev; deport
I’m just waiting to see who the first Democrat apologist will be to say “Okay, this proves a lot of illegal vote trafficking, but you can’t see who the votes were for, so you can’t claim that they were all for Biden.”

I've seen that bullsh*t argument presented elsewhere.

67 posted on 05/04/2022 8:44:38 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Tucker, Hannity and Laura all prove to be gutless on this.


68 posted on 05/04/2022 8:52:55 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

Look you and I both believe that most if not all fraudulent votes would likely have been for Biden but what we believe is not “proof” and that is the problem. One of the issues I have with constantly bringing up the last election is that without concrete proof, you are never going to change people’s minds. And if you can’t change their minds, you are just wasting time and energy talking about it.

If there is irrefutable proof of clear fraud in significant number to potentially change the election results then it needs to see the light of day. But all we ever see is circumstantial evidence which might be suspicious and makes you wonder but is not really clearly convincing. The measure of the strength of evidence is not whether it convinces someone who voted for Trump but instead, if it convinces someone who didn’t vote for him.


69 posted on 05/04/2022 9:16:01 AM PDT by XRdsRev (Justice for Bernell Trammell, Trump supporter, murdered in 2020)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Didja expect anything else?


70 posted on 05/04/2022 9:19:19 AM PDT by sauropod ("We put all our politicians in prison as soon as they are elected. Don’t you?" Why? "It saves time.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST

It doesn’t matter to me if you watch Fox or not.


71 posted on 05/04/2022 9:20:20 AM PDT by Jamestown1630 ("A Republic, if you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: XRdsRev
Look you and I both believe that most if not all fraudulent votes would likely have been for Biden but what we believe is not “proof” and that is the problem.

You are advocating "beyond reasonable doubt" rather than "a preponderance of the evidence."

The proof we have is adequate to demonstrate the election is false and should not be accepted as legitimate.

The measure of the strength of evidence is not whether it convinces someone who voted for Trump but instead, if it convinces someone who didn’t vote for him.

Many such people will not be moved by absolute proof. Do not waste time trying to present it to them.

As Upton Sinclair noted:

"It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it."

72 posted on 05/04/2022 9:22:02 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Things were looking So good then the Wuhan Hoax,,,,
Sh!t.


73 posted on 05/04/2022 9:28:25 AM PDT by Big Red Badger (We Are JONAH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spacejunkie2001

Tried the Brave browser which was better. Nothing near me though.


74 posted on 05/04/2022 9:37:18 AM PDT by Pollard (Don't ask if there's a conspiracy. If you're not in one, you need to start one. CA Fitts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Ferndina

Did they name the non- profit?


75 posted on 05/04/2022 9:39:39 AM PDT by Dr. Ursus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Pollard

Pay the 20 bucks to stream it Saturday. Then you can watch with more people but not pay more


76 posted on 05/04/2022 9:39:47 AM PDT by spacejunkie2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Big Red Badger

I agree 100%


77 posted on 05/04/2022 10:30:04 AM PDT by Macho MAGA Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Fox Business did a segment on 2000 Mules with Dinesh and Larry Kudlow.


78 posted on 05/04/2022 11:06:01 AM PDT by Titus-Maximus (The trouble with socialism is that you soon run out of other people's zoo animals to eat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus-Maximus

Was it today? If so I’ll have to find it.


79 posted on 05/04/2022 2:19:28 PM PDT by Macho MAGA Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: max americana

Not an FDR fan myself.

I just like to quote famous democrats because just like a broken clock is right twice a day, they sometimes get it right.

FDR knew exactly what the game was with respect to Germany and Japan. He seemed to be lost when it came to the Soviets, but with his merry band of communists I suspect he may have been a closet socialist. Perhaps even more ironic is that FDR managed to get it right when it comes to American involvement and timing of entry in WWII. IF the Japanese had not sensed the Americans as a threat, they would have continued to force Zhukov and his armored divisions to stay in Siberia. The Soviets would have collapsed to Germany, IMHO.


80 posted on 05/06/2022 7:22:49 AM PDT by Pete Dovgan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson