Posted on 04/30/2022 10:24:09 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
Dr. Li Meng Yan was on the Joe Hoft Show at 93.3 on Friday. At the end of the interview, Dr. Yan made a HUGE statement.
President Trump was destroying China’s plans of world domination and China’s economy. We saw this back in early 2020. The US economy was setting records for the greatest economy in history, it had nearly doubled China’s. If there ever was a reason for China to drop a bioweapon, the fact that China’s economy was imploding and Trump’s economy was the greatest ever, was enough reason for China to drop the COVID-19 bioweapon intentionally.
On Friday, Dr. Li-Meng Yan was on with Joe Hoft and she discussed her research of COVID beginning in late 2019 from Hong Kong where she was a virologist working as a Ph.D. at the University of Hong Kong. Dr. Yan fled China after providing evidence that the COVID-19 virus was created in a laboratory.
Dr. Yan was first on the airwaves in June 2021 to discuss COVID-19’s origins in the US:
Dr. Li-Meng Yan was one of the first to research the emerging coronavirus and previously revealed she was forced into hiding after accusing Beijing of a cover-up.
Now, as international leaders finally focus on her Wuhan lab-leak theory, the scientist told Newsmax that Fauci’s emails contain “a lot of useful information” suggesting he always knew more than he revealed.
“They verify my work from the very beginning, even from last January, that these people know what happened, but they choose to hide for the Chinese Communist Party and for their own benefits”.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
I never believed that it was an accident.
"...just one more thing...jab"
It’s possible, but don’t you think the Chicoms would have developed a vaccine first for the elites before release into the general population?
5.56mm
Without a doubt China foisted the Fauci Flu on the world. And Dems+deep state were part of planners and executors of the plan.
The “next thing” is to take control of the food supply.
Could it all boil down to their idea of “Face?” Because they lost a ton of it to Trump.
Pelosi went to China in December 2019 to be briefed on the plandemic which was already initiated most likely. The CCP gave her the orders which she followed when she returned to tell the nation to go to Chinatown and the theater and restaurants.
To me, it doesn’t fit. I think it was released accidently.
1) Why release in Wuhan? - Why not another place where there isn’t a bio- weapon’s lab? Why not some other place where it is not in China - so it would be harder to connect the dots? Or if you are going to release it, make it look like was it was the US that did it or someone in the West?
2) Why not a more powerful bio-weapon to do more damage?
3) The reaction to the covid seemed to me a cover-up, not a deployment.
With that being said, they used it for all its worth - don’t let a crisis go to waste.
I’ve said from the beginning that it was a deliberate act. My first impression was that China released the virus to get out of the trade deal they made with Trump. China had much to lose with Trump in The White House. Like Democrats, they hate him so much, they will go to any length to destroy him, while destroying this country.
But this whole US/global/human takedown is also clearly orchestrated from the West, including the DoD among other US federal departments, as well.
I am always wary when finger-pointing at the CCP doesn’t include the traitors from Europe—and within.
Same here
This is a dry run for the Mark of the Beast.
The sheep 🐑🐑🐑 are being conditioned.
When the vaccine that is not really a vaccine became the mission of the MSM along with 24/7 fear it was very obvious that something was was very, very wrong.
Except the american communists who knew that they needed help in stealing the forthcoming 2020 election...
They certainly got it...
The chicoms were just thanking the Clintons for their major contribution to the chicom missle program...
More proof that:
The only good communists are dead communists...
(Why release in Wuhan? - Why not another place where there isn’t a bio- weapon’s lab?)
Well, if one wants to make it look like an accident, one has to have it released at such a site.
Otherwise it’s an obvious biological attack / terrorism.
(The “next thing” is to take control of the food supply.)
If one is going to subjugate the sheep for the eventual Mark of the Beast, that would be a logical step. 🤔
✝️🙏🛐
I believe the Uniparty knew all about it as well, and gave China their blessing to release it.
I am now well aware of that now, since it became crystal clear when Trump was elected president. DC is now the richest area in US. Money and greed trumps MAGA.
But the Democrats/RINOs desperately still want you to believe all those things had literally nothing to do with each other and all just coincidentally happened during the 2020 election year.
FYI: The DNC Chairman, Jaime Harrison, is now making the rounds on MSNBC and other far-left MSM, loudly warning all Americans that the GOP is built on "fear," "fraud" and "fascism." Those scary words by Democrats means we're getting closer and closer to election time! And Democrats' fear-mongering works every time. Look no further than the 2020 stolen election (between a senile sleepy zombie and the very popular President Trump).
OTOH:
Given the far-reaching implications of the “Yan Report,” RR:C19 sought out peer reviews from world-renowned experts in virology, molecular biology, structural biology, computational biology, vaccine development, and medicine. Collectively, reviewers have debunked the authors’ claims that: bat coronaviruses ZC45 or ZXC21 were used as a background strain to engineer SARS-CoV-2, the presence of restriction sites flanking the RBD suggest prior screening for a virus targeting the human ACE2 receptor, and the furin-like cleavage site is unnatural and provides evidence of engineering. In all three cases, the reviewers provide counter-arguments based on peer-reviewed literature and long-established foundational knowledge that directly refute the claims put forth by Yan et al. There was a general consensus that the study’s claims were better explained by potential political motivations rather than scientific integrity. The peer reviewers arrived at these common opinions independently, further strengthening the credibility of the peer reviews.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Li-Meng_Yan
Yep
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.