Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court rules against Unvaccinated Air Force officer…
https://citizenfreepress.com ^ | Posted by Kane on April 19, 2022 11:18 am

Posted on 04/19/2022 9:55:22 AM PDT by Red Badger

By a 6–3 vote, the Supreme Court sides against a lieutenant colonel in the Air Force Reserve who refuses to get the COVID vaccine on religious grounds. Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch dissent.https://t.co/Ke2pQtCT3f pic.twitter.com/WXirK9Qt07

— Mark Joseph Stern (@mjs_DC) April 18, 2022

The Supreme Court Monday denied an Air Force Reserve officer’s request for a preliminary injunction shielding him from punishment for refusing to follow the military’s Covid Vaccine mandate.

The justices said the Pentagon need not accommodate Lt. Col. Jonathan Dunn, who said he had a religious objection to the coronavirus vaccine. Elizabeth B. Prelogar, the U.S. solicitor general, wrote in response to Dunn’s application that “the Air Force has a compelling interest in requiring applicant to be as medically and physically prepared for deployment with his reserve unit as possible, particularly because his unit is designed to be deployable worldwide with just 72 hours’ notice.”


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: braking
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

1 posted on 04/19/2022 9:55:22 AM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I can understand the general rationale, but the problem is the assumption that the “vaccine” would actually be beneficial. From everything we know now, it seems clear that the risks outweigh any possibly benefits by a mile.


2 posted on 04/19/2022 9:57:59 AM PDT by noiseman (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

what bull shit.


3 posted on 04/19/2022 9:58:22 AM PDT by Sequoyah101 (Politicians are only marginally good at one thing, being politicians. Otherwise they are fools.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

So much for religious liberty...


4 posted on 04/19/2022 9:59:27 AM PDT by Democrat = party of treason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I wish this would have come down different, but the military is a unique case where lots of ‘rights’ are voluntarily given up by servicemen. The problem I have with this is when its a question of religion, that freedom goes so deep to the core of our nations founding and values that it should be weighed heavily and carefully. This will ultimately only hurt our military and readiness.


5 posted on 04/19/2022 9:59:55 AM PDT by Magnum44 (...against all enemies, foreign and domestic...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
I actually agree with Barrett and with Kavanaugh on this. I am okay with the courts determining whether or not the military can force someone out of the service. I am not okay with granting to judges the authority to assign military personnel to specific roles. That prerogative is exclusively We have to consider how that power could be abused by activist judges ordering certain people into certain roles based on their race, gender, political persuasion, etc..
6 posted on 04/19/2022 10:01:25 AM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

They are weeding out individual thinkers. The military will be comprised of the compliant. Makes it very easy to give the military tasks that could be considered objectionable, and have a high degree of confidence those tasks will be handled.


7 posted on 04/19/2022 10:02:12 AM PDT by brownsfan (It's going to take real, serious, hard times to wake the American public.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: noiseman

The risk in my own case has been zero so far.
First jab was 14 months ago, 3 more jabs since.
None, zero, nada, adverse effects so far.

But I agree with you that effectiveness in preventing serious infection/death are not conclusive.

On the positive side, full vaccination document has enabled me to enjoy 5 cruises since September 2021.


8 posted on 04/19/2022 10:02:15 AM PDT by entropy12 (Blockade of Cuba by USA was OK by neocons, but Russia must tolerate NATO weapons on its border!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Democrat = party of treason
But Amy said foh dee chilluns.

I remember when she was being confirmed the usual suspects gushed over what a great conservative she is. I'm still waiting. And frat boy Brett, well, cut from the same cloth.

9 posted on 04/19/2022 10:02:32 AM PDT by Governor Dinwiddie (LORD, grant thy people grace to withstand the temptations of the world, the flesh, and the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Magnum44

> the military is a unique case where lots of ‘rights’ are
> voluntarily given up by servicemen.

Unless you’re LGBTQIZYLALFUYW.

Then you have more rights than anyone else, including the right to bill the U.S. military for “gender reassignemnt” surgery and the vastly expensive attending drug regimen.


10 posted on 04/19/2022 10:03:24 AM PDT by Westbrook (The Democrats are wizards at two things: Finding votes and losing evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

“6–3 vote”

I’m confidant that we know who the bad actors are here.


11 posted on 04/19/2022 10:03:54 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Magnum44
I agree that the military vax policy is a terrible one. And I do believe the courts should be able to step in and prevent discharges or terminations of personnel for reasons such as this.

But I alsothink it would be much worse to let judges start making assignment decisions in the military. It is for that exact same reason that I do not believe judges should have the authority to force the military to accept transgender recruits.

12 posted on 04/19/2022 10:04:03 AM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook

I have never been a fan of using the military as a social experiment.


13 posted on 04/19/2022 10:04:22 AM PDT by Magnum44 (...against all enemies, foreign and domestic...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

The SCOTUS order was literally two sentences. No explanation given

I believe it falls under the long-standing, general category of: when you sign up with Uncle Sam, they own your @ss.


14 posted on 04/19/2022 10:05:06 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin

No disagreement from me on that. Military readiness is the paramount issue and letting in psychologically unhealthy people of any kind is not good for readiness.


15 posted on 04/19/2022 10:06:25 AM PDT by Magnum44 (...against all enemies, foreign and domestic...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

5 cruises are totally worth loss of freedom and personal medical choice.


16 posted on 04/19/2022 10:10:18 AM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

By the DOD’s new rules on diversity, the jab is racist because it was invented almost entirely by white people.


17 posted on 04/19/2022 10:10:35 AM PDT by Tell It Right (1st Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: noiseman

So this proves that we have a liberal SCOUS. The last two picks for Donald Trump were NOT conservative constitutionalists. Neither was Chief Justice Roberts.


18 posted on 04/19/2022 10:10:51 AM PDT by Machavelli (True God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

so say 6 judges on the court of zero Justice. one day they will be judged.


19 posted on 04/19/2022 10:11:37 AM PDT by dadfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Magnum44

I can chop off my dong and make them give me estrogen, but I can’t refuse to get a fake vaccine…


20 posted on 04/19/2022 10:12:03 AM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson