Posted on 01/25/2022 6:37:37 PM PST by BusterDog
Relating to: Wisconsin election reform and reclaiming the electoral ballots for President and Vice President that were certified under fraudulent intent and purpose.
Status: A - Rules
Important Actions (newest first)
Action Journal
1/25/2022 Asm. Read and referred to Committee on Rules
I agree, GP is useless most of the time.
Are any of the other states currently still looking into decertifying?
I’ll wait for a more credible source than The Hoft Bothers.
And GP. One of the brothers is a flaming faggot.
I’ll pass on reading.
AZ, MI...are you paying attention?
Electors already sent, counted, and tabulated in Congress. Well past any deadlines for sending (or not sending) Electors.
Meaningless.
The actual bill: https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/2021/proposals/ab743
Text: https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/2021/related/proposals/ab743
Sounds like somebody figured out they were allergic to global thermonuclear war.
“The Constitution says natural born citizen.
Obama is NOT one.”
Neither is Harris.
Can you say “President PeesLoosley”? ? ?
That’s right! Fearless Leader is so popular his vote count exceeded available eligible voters
Should have noted it was GP.
So it is yet another made up GP story.
Nice find.
Here is a link directly to the PDF of the resolution.
https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/2021/related/proposals/ajr120.pdf
If it goes anywhere, I’ll happily eat my touque, but that something is even out there is a sign of hope.
All that happened is that a privileged resolution was referred to the Rules Committee, as allowed in the Assembly rules, where it will most likely die.
Fat chance...
I’m still waiting for them to decertify Truman’s election and Kennedy’s election...
The same kind of communist & political gangsters raided the cemeteries, participated in the fraudulent vote counting operations, and delivered carloads of ballots to any districts that needed them to alter the vote tallies...
If it were from any other source than the GP.
Gateway Pundit. 🙄
Looks like they changed the headline - the link URL indicates that was indeed the original title
More GP nonsense
Who is going to remove him? Congress? The Supreme Court? HA!
> “Even if they decertified all the stolen elections, Biden will still be president.”
Not accurate. We analyzed this last year right before the AZ Legislature approved a full forensic audit of Maricopa.
A very few states, between 2 and 3 max, depending on which decertify, moves the process to the House of Representatives to select the President under the 12th Amendment.
But it’s not 425 members in the House that vote, it’s one vote for each state delegation. This translates to one vote per state. Trump wins.
So there is a pathway to returning Trump via the 12th Amendment.
There is also State AGs suing the United States under Article II and Article IV where they would file directly in the US Supreme Court which has original jurisdiction. This is also a path to return Trump and it’s realistic once State AGs see momentum.
Momentum: The state decertifications provide momentum and courage to other states and also to State AGs to pursue a Supreme Court ruling.
American history is marked by a public hesitancy to stay out of internal wars. Power ringleaders especially global banks distract by backing foreign wars. The American People are largely pacifist. This is why in all American wars, there is a pattern of Americans fighting Americans first in deciding whether or not to engage in war at home or abroad.
History shows it takes about 2 to 3 years for the American public to get behind a conflict marked by internal dissent. So we are right on schedule.
My question is how the Constitution will handle a President that was restored after an illegal coup. If Trump is returned to the White House, does he serve until Jan 20, 2025? Or is his presidency extended somehow to account for the lost years stolen from him?
This latter question was asked last year by several notable constitutional scholars but I never saw a satisfactory answer because I suspect there is no clear answer as such a thing has never happened before that was made public.
“Even if they decertified all the stolen elections, Biden will still be president.”
At least this is something real that they will have to explain away, unlike the fake “Russian collusion” mantra the media repeated and never tried to verify.
I see that you are right. GP probably initially thought that the vote that was taken immediately after the introduction of the resolution was on the resolution itself. Rather, what happened was that the resolution was introduced during the debate on an unrelated bill. As a privileged resolution it had to be addressed immediately, which the chair did by referring it to the Rules Committee. The vote that was then taken was on the original legislation that had nothing to do with this resolution.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.