Peer-Reviewed: Ivermectin Resulted in a 67% Reduction in COVID Hospitalization and a 70% Reduction in COVID Mortality

Granite Grok ^ | January 23, 2022 | Steve MacDonald

[ProfessorGoldiloxx]

"Getting your Horse-Faced Horse-Paste Democrat Friends to swallow this truth bomb is going to be like feeding a pill to a cat. It is a peer-reviewed research study on Ivermectin from Brazil.

We analyzed data from a prospective, observational study of the citywide COVID-19 prevention with ivermectin program, which was conducted between July 2020 and December 2020 in Itajaí, Brazil.

The results: “…regular use of ivermectin as a prophylactic agent was associated with significantly reduced COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and mortality rates.”

What does significant mean?

According to the researchers, Ivermectin resulted in a 67% reduction in hospitalization and a 70% reduction in mortality.

Translation: Democrat’s objections and deliberate lies about this safe, affordable treatment could be responsible for nearly 70% of hospitalizations and deaths due to COVID19.

The Dems didn’t just kill Grandma. They killed a majority in every age group.

This means that you can take whatever number of deaths they spit out like the cat with the pill and lay 70% of them at their Ivermectin disinformation campaign feet.

They killed these people. ..."

[ProfessorGoldiloxx]

Founded January 8, 1828, the alt-far-left-communist-democRATs are a 195 year old death cult (trailing islam by approximately 1200 years).

[rbg81]

They never wanted an easy out to CV-19. It conflicted with too many of their other goals, including:
— Getting rid of Trump
— Making a fortune for Big Pharma
— Enabling The Great Reset (e.g., fascism).

[Singermom]

Anyone working on a virus like this would have made an ANTIDOTE just in case someone got infected. Where is the antidote. I am sure that is what fauci took. No way he took the poison “vaccine”.

[Uncle Miltie]

Been tole by some windbag doktrr nonpossible.

[CatHerd]

Cureus is not a respected journal, and their “peer-review” process is highly unusual and suspect.

[Secret Agent Man]

Waiting for the FR “docs” to say “wrong”

[DannyTN]

we need to split responsibility for therapeutics to treat illnesses from vaccines.

No more “vaccine only” mindsets in charge of therapeutics.

[metmom]

Of course because nothing that contradicts the Branch Covidian vax shill narrative is good enough for them.

[bagster]

Cureus is not a respected journal, and their “peer-review” process is highly unusual and suspect.

Haha. As if anybody cares what you 'respect'. Not when you respect CDC/NIH/WHO/FDA/Pharma/Biden/Democrats/Fauci/China. So why in HELL would anybody give a damn what YOU respect.

#FactsAreYourKryptonite

#ScienceDenier

[griswold3]

Vaccine only if it provides immunity. MRNA does NOT provide immunity.
If this was a real pandemic ALL methods of treatment would be available.

[bagster]

Oh look, gassie. Peer reviewed and errthang.

[monkeyshine]

All methods of treatment should be available for all ailments. This war against re-purposing older drugs and various vitamin and mineral combinations is totally insane and has nothing to do with science.

[freespirit2012]

It’s called mass formation, there is always an excuse and a refusal to accept logic or anything that differs from the accepted narrative.

[Jayster]

Watching this post to see ⛽️ do his best to discredit this study.

It’s what he has to do because his heels are dug in so deep and it would require him to admit that he was wrong….

Oh wait!!! He will say that in his hospital ALL of the patients in ICU are the un-vaccinated and that Ivermectin does very little if anything…. That would be anecdotal, but he will pretend that trumps anything else including peer reviewed studies….

I have anecdotal evidence also from many Medical Professionals that are my friends and not one of them agrees with ⛽️.

Just waiting for the pretzel logic to happen.

[Steve_Seattle]

"No more “vaccine only” mindsets in charge of therapeutics."

Amen. Once Trump said a few positive things about HCQ, the media and medical establishment moved in lockstep to discredit, mock, even prohibit, any approaches to Covid other than masks, social distancing, and lockdowns.

Once the vaccines became available, it was the vaccines or nothing, and we heard nothing from official sources about the possible benefits of OTC prophylactics and early treatments that were beginning to be reported in various medical journals worldwide: Vitamins C and D3, Zinc, Quercetin, NAC, Melatonin, Nigella Sativa, and all the others that seemed to show some benefit.

[CatHerd]

Actual peer-reviewed journal:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8415510/

[metmom]

LOL!!!

[metmom]

After the Lancet debacle, peer review has ZERO credibility.

And as the source is the NIH, the government agency pushing these shots, that further obliterates any credibility the “study” may have had left.

[Gaffer]

A more detailed and in-depth analysis of these data shows us that they do not provide enough evidence of effectiveness of (insert your drug here) because.....

Gee....data...imagine that. They mean 'data' like that from the trials of the Covid Vaccines? You know, the data Pfizer and the FDA want dribbed and drabbed out for 75 years? Take this NIH stuff and, well, stuff it...