Posted on 01/21/2022 9:25:14 AM PST by Enterprise
Republican Senator Rogers filed the bill in order to attempt to hold mandating employers liable “for any health complications associated with any required medical products or procedures.”
The bill aims to “protect employees who suffer any adverse reactions, injury, disability, loss of wages, pain and suffering or medical expenses correlating to the employer mandate. Furthermore, if any injuries arise within 120 days after receiving an employee mandated medical product or procedure, it would be presumed that the product or procedure is the cause.”
(Excerpt) Read more at redvoicemedia.com ...
To begin with, people have probably been getting mixed, disturbing messages about alleged problems with experimental CV19 mRNA jabs. So people are understandably taking a caveat emptor (let the buyer beware) stance on getting jabbed, especially where harassment for not getting a jab is concerned.
Study Reveals That Unjabbed Are Better Informed Than Jabbed (12.27.21)
The Nuremberg Code, ‘Informed Consent’ and Vaccine Mandates (11.10.21)
Can The Government Inject Anything Into Our Veins Without Our informed Consent (7.29.21)
MIT Study: Vaccine Hesitancy Is 'Highly Informed, Scientifically Literate,' and 'Sophisticated' (7.17.21)
Next, the EUA law, probably unconstitutional imo, mandates, in part (II), that we should have been officially informed about things like possible spike protein problems and other alleged concerns before getting jab, due process counseling arguably ignored by many pro-vax talking heads.
21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3 - Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies (excerpted)
"(e) Conditions of authorization(1) Unapproved product(A) Required conditions(i)...(ii) Appropriate conditions designed to ensure that individuals to whom the product is administered are informed—
(I) that the Secretary [Secretary of Health and Human Services] has authorized the emergency use of the product;(II) of the significant known and potential benefits and risks of such use, and of the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown; and
(III) of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks [emphases added]."
Also, note that part (III) of EUA requires that people be informed of other possible remedies before choosing whether or not to get jab.
Finally, as a consequence of what is seemingly growing evidence of poorly planned, poorly executed, alleged vote counting fraud by Democrats to steal 2020 elections, Democrats had arguably destroyed their credibility concerning election before they took over management of government-promoted jabs, foolishly bullying everybody to get jabbed. So a growing number of people understandably aren't “buying” what Democrats are trying to “sell” them concerning election or jabs imo.
Corrections, insights welcome.
That’s not what I asked. You asked about the roll call vote and U.S. Code.
Do you have that information?
Absolutely. Definitely should be asking those questions.
This is a way to stop the whole scam.
It’s also against US Federal law. Hear any repubs speaking out about it ? Nope, not one.
It is federal law. They can’t be forced on anyone and no one can lose their job. Not one Republican has tried to bring it up and stop it.
Surely since it is federal law, you can cite me to that code section?
This is an excllent idea. Since, the covidians will claim that there are no side effects to speak of, how can they oppose something so reasonable?
14th Amendment
# Can you also cite to the place in the U.S. Code where the Nuremberg can be found?
This is something I would like to know as well.
I do not think it was ever actually voted on as a treaty, nor was it ever incorporated into the U.S. Code. I’d be happy for someone with more information who might correct me on this.
Personally, I think most o the comments about the Nuremburg code are statements of morality(which I agree with BTW), but they are not actual statements regarding law.
I was thinking about this the other day and came to a rather surprising (to me) conclusion that if it is a fact of law that those executed after WWII were executed because they violated this ‘code’, they were actually executed via a bill of attainder.
The other day there was a story out of Europe that a life insurance company was NOT going to pay out on a policy of someone who WAS JABBED, was injected with this crap ‘vaccine’ and died because of it. The company ruled that the client ‘knew’ about the risks and went ahead with the injection anyway.
So, if you acquiesce to the jab, your tyrannical ‘leaders’ will not come after you, but if you die from the jab, your insurance states ‘you should have known better.’
I never said it was part of the US code.
It is internationally recognized as wrong.
This is exactly what I’d been calling for here. Employers, without legal orders from Government, making a unilateral decision that affects an employee 24/7 for an 8 hour period AND which has the potential to cause devastating effects. Of course they should be completely liable for damages.
Regardless of whether this particular proposed bill gets enacted we will see legal action brought for any damages that may result. It only takes the first case and some determined lawyers.
I have heard some insurance companies are not paying for treatment of injuries because it was an experimental drug.
mark
*
The 14th Amendment is the Nuremberg Code? Really? Can we look at them side by side so that we can compare them?
Buh, buh, but... the Nuremberg code iz da bomb!
It’s law! We gots to follow it! Or elz!
I remember seeing on FR some of the vaccine exemption letters people had written that mentioned Nuremberg and thinking how sad it is that people are so ignorant to put that in a letter. People have been sold a crap sandwich that Nuremburg is superior to US ‘friggin law 42 U.S.C. §2000a.
You might as well mention Nürburgring in the letter - maybe the HR person who denies the exemption request likes car racing and the employee can talk with the HR person as said employee is cleaning out his desk.
(a) Equal access
All persons shall be entitled to the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, and accommodations of any place of public accommodation, as defined in this section, without discrimination or segregation on the ground of race, color, religion, or national origin.
******************************
I suppose one could argue that the vaccine is against their religion, but those exemptions seem pretty hard to get. So not sure this has anything to do with vaccines.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.