Posted on 11/06/2021 9:07:31 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
The FBI’s presence in Kenosha sets off a cascade of questions, all of the answers to which should trigger every alarm in the book.
The Rittenhouse trial has been a marvel to watch, simply because the prosecution’s presentation of this case has been a train wreck of dumpster fires. We’ve watched as the defense has absolutely fileted almost everything the prosecution has presented, as the Judge continues to make statements that will likely benefit the defense’s case. However, a funny thing happened in the courtroom that went by even me for a bit. Here we were talking about the various videos that were taken at the scene and what they show. Here’s the one video of one angle, of one part of the street, and then there’s another of this other angle, showing these people who were involved in the shoot. Then there’s the FBI drone video directly over the shooting, and there there’s another video on the ground in front of the gas station. Each of the videos provided its own unique view of…… wait…. go back a minute…. what’s that part about an FBI drone??
Why in the hell was there an FBI drone directly over the shooting? Have we even considered the ramifications of what that actually means? Our government, for any reason that they perceive to be a threat, can conduct mass surveillance of you without a warrant? Certainly, this was a public place and the courts have ruled that surveillance can be conducted in public without a warrant, however, there were local police resources. Why would the FBI be conducting this surveillance if they had no way of stopping or preventing what was happening, from occurring? Regardless of the legality of it, should we as citizens become comfortable with the idea that this is normal? Out of an abundance of generosity, let’s just say they were somehow justified with having a drone overhead, why this specific area? Kenosha riots covered several dozen square blocks of town, so if they were conducting surveillance, were they doing so with multiple drones? There are two very simple answers to the question: Yes and no.
Well, I am a negative guy so let’s start with no. Why this one drone? Why this one area? And probably most importantly (and in my least Alex Jones-y voice I can muster), how did you end up directly over this shooting that night, despite all the other areas in the city where bad things were happening? While I have never been a conspiracy theorist and abhor conspiracy theories, it seems wildly coincidental that of the several dozen square block area of Kenosha where there was violence going down that night, that you end up directly over the one shooting that is going to cause a national debate? I can’t be the only one here thinking that’s awfully convenient.
If the answer is yes, then the next question we should ask ourselves is then, how many? Why did the FBI decide on that many drones? If that many drones, how many in each area? Why those areas? Was there some specific threat posed in those areas? Was local law enforcement involved? Were they aware? Did they have access to the video feed? Now again, out of an abundance of generosity, let’s assume those questions are answered in a way that justifies the reasons why, but what about the answer to the question: to what end? Were local authorities notified of crimes in progress? Were they dispatched to any of the areas where a crime in progress was occurring? How many crimes were stopped or prevented by the FBI drones?
We should consider that maybe that wasn’t the objective of the drones. Maybe they were just there to observe and then use the video to later arrest perpetrators of all of the riots and looting that occurred in Kenosha. Then how many arrests have occurred? How many people have been prosecuted as a result of the video? How many of the business owners have specific suspects they can pursue civil remedies against? Can we see the video from all of the drones from that night? What’s that….? The FBI has lost video from that night in this case? We do know that means the FBI has violated federal law, right?
The point is none of the answers to these questions is any good. We know they had at least one drone, but if there was one, it was over a really specific area, don’t you think? If there was more than one, why that many, and if that many, what were you able to accomplish with them, and if the answer to that is nothing, WHY THE HELL WERE THEY THERE IN THE FIRST PLACE?
Are you comfortable with random, unnecessary surveillance by an organization that admittedly has broken federal law and has proven to be a cesspool of incompetence?
Good. Me Neither.
I agree, quite possibly from a plane that was filming a wide area rather than a drone.
And IIRC, that van full of homemade fireworks bombs was intercepted as a result of a tip, when the crew made a stop a gas station or convenience store and the locals were suspicious.
The drone was helping BLM and the rest of the insurrectionists. IMHO
Yeah, ok...but why is the FBI involved?
What was the federal interest?
That seems to be the point...
They most likely had to remove all the blinkers identifying all the agents they had planted in the crowd(s).
Deflect much?
The FBI is crappola.
Remember, the Murrah building was bombed.The FBI went around Oklahoma City and confiscated ALL security camera data and have refused to ever release any of the footage?
What are they covering up there?
FBI is dirty.
Maybe it is because the fbi once again, was executing a false flag operation to try to entrap and frame a patriot?
How many more examples of fbi misconduct do we need to believe the fbi is the enemy? This is not just in the last 5 years. Ruby Ridge, Elian Gonzalez (The young boy stolen by the fbi from his father), the January 6th entrapment, and hundreds more examples of fbi misconduct have occurred.
Consider this:
FBI knew there would be a riot.
The FBI watched all of the Antifa and BLM riots and murders
The FBI did nothing to stop the riots
The FBI handed over evidence to the prosecution, but withheld evidence from the defense.
The FBI was deeply involved with the faking of the Trump Russia collusion
The FBI, recommended Mueller (and thus Weismann) for special prosecutor team to investigate a lie they created, then destroyed evidence of the investigation (cellphones)
The FBI had Seth Rich laptop for 4 years and lied about it, then classified the information on it, what could a dead DNC worker have that’s classified?
The FBI allowed Hillary to destroy evidence and colluded with Crowdstrike and other IT firms to blame Russian Hackers for the DNC leak
The list goes on and on.
At some point the FBI looks more like the Gestapo or KGB for the Democratic Socialists, and not a police agency.
As I posted in a VANITY last week... this likely means there’s HD video of every riot that occurred that year around the United States.
Where’s the footage?
FOIA requests should be going out, though it’ll quickly become ‘top secret.’
Thousands of acts of arson, looting, etc. with billions of property destroyed - insurance usually excludes ‘civil unrest’ so these owners have been wiped out financially in many cases.
Where’s the footage?
What does it show they don’t want us to see?
This one video clearly shows Kyle was ambushed by bipolar Rosenbaum (”If I get one of you guys alone I’ll kill you” was an earlier threat from him).
But there were hundreds of crimes on that video in HD where people could be identified.
Only guy charged is the one ‘good guy with a gun’ out to help business owners and offer first aid.
Kyle hasn’t been charged with manslaughter either. FIRST DEGREE.
He should be found not guilty and then the actual criminals charged.
re: “WHY THE HELL WERE THEY THERE IN THE FIRST PLACE?”
While you’re cogitating on that, riddle me why the FBI is investigating the theft or loss of a diary by the daughter of the pres of the US?
Hey, it’s all legit...Delivering Our Justice followed the rules through the double Top Secret FISA courts...got the rubber approvals stamps and everything.
Ding, ding, ding!
There’s a pattern here of orchestrating riots and using the propaganda from these to formulate public opinion against their enemies. (Us)
“ Our government, for any reason that they perceive to be a threat, can conduct mass surveillance of you without a warrant? Certainly, this was a public place and the courts have ruled that surveillance can be conducted in public without a warrant, however, there were local police resources.”
______________________
I am currently designing satellite communication equipment for the Predator Drone specially designed for surveillance within the United States. This project is very near completion of its first phase (pre-production) which has to be fully functional in every aspect to move on to phase 2. There will be so many Predators flying with this most advanced and powerful equipment inside the United States surveilling our citizenry you wouldn’t believe it.
Not that it would hamper its production, but I may not be able to continue my work, depending on the outcome of my religious exemption application, already a week overdue, according to the timeline they stated as to when I could expect a response.
And, just coincidentally, I took out the part number for the very top level assembly documentation just last Friday. 1406660 - one for the beast.
Yep!
Anyone else find it interesting that there was not a word about stopping the "mostly peaceful protests" when innocent black people including children were being murdered but the moment three white male felons got shot suddenly democRATS were trampling each other to get to the microphones to call for the riots to stop?
The wrong people are under surveillance today. Our honest law enforcement people are handcuffed from doing their job while the Deep State fools are running the show - Wray, Garland, any leader at DHS and some of DOJ.
The White House is now the Red house! And the center of the Biden Criminal Organization.
America, we have a problem!!!
20. J Edgar Hoover is one of the main reasons we still have America. If you haven’t been there, STFU.
PS. I also say the same thing to some so-called historians and critics of Vietnam!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.