NOT MAKING HEADLINES: AZ Audit Could Not Find the Identity of 86,391 Voters – They Don’t Appear to Exist and 73.8% Are Democrat or No Party Affiliation

GP ^ | September 27, 2021 | Jim Hoft

[White Lives Matter]

The Arizona audit could not find an identity match on 86,391 people. This is disclosed on Page 56 of the “Results Details” report.

These Maricopa voters cast ballots in Nov 2020 and don’t seem to exist. The ones registered as Democrat or selected no party affiliation represent a whopping 73.8% of these unknown voters. That’s 63,757 ballots. Not selecting a party makes monitoring of nefarious registrations much harder as everything not R or D is bulked together as “Other”. Even the new State voter registration form now only has only 3 categories (R, D, Other) and some registration reporting reduced to similar.

Cyber Ninja’s used Melissa Personator which is arguably the best commercial service to validate U.S. or Canadian identities. It scours private and government databases including USPS and Social Security Administration. Cyber Ninja’s oddly concludes most of these “unknowns” might be real people that just have limited public records. Our name, DOB, SS#, and address are in every State and Fed database. If you can’t be found using these credentials, something is definitely wrong.

The Ninja’s didn’t consider Maricopa’s history, it’s registration battles, or issues with non-citizen voters. They make no consideration the database might have been manipulated but know it was hacked Nov. 5th 2020. Had the Senate subpoenaed Maricopa’s VRAS servers and tasked CyFIR to investigate, we might know a whole lot more.

[White Lives Matter]

The media is completely silent on this.

[Steve_Seattle]

So the net Dem advantage of these unidentified votes would be a little more than 40,000 votes, more than three times Biden’s margin of victory.

[babble-on]

The media is not silent on this. The Wall Street Journal published their lead editorial today on this exact topic, explaining why it’s a lie.

[Vendome]

[Osage Orange]

The media is completely silent on this.

And we know why....

THEY CHEATED!!!

We "might" see some RINO's getting fevered up....But only if they see the end of the tunnel...

I doubt they have the balls...to get fevered up...on a STOLEN POTUS Election.....

[RBW in PA]

What difference does it make? Nothing is going to happen.

[Lakeshark]

Since I don’t get the WSJ, please explain to us all why they claim it is a lie.

[bray]

The media has no curiosity on this. They are still researching how Putin stole 2016.

[ConservativeInPA]

The media is completely silent on this.

Most Republicans, err, Assistant Democrats, are completely silent on the entire report.

[Wuli]

Illegals.

[ClearCase_guy]

Indeed. If the Republican Establishment (across the nation) are not up in arms over the AZ audit report, then that means that nothing will be done. Doesn’t matter what the content is or how accurate or how shocking it is. The Republican Party has apparently decided not to care.

So then what?

[kiryandil]

Cyber Ninja’s oddly concludes most of these “unknowns” might be real people that just have limited public records. Our name, DOB, SS#, and address are in every State and Fed database.

No.

If you can’t be found using these credentials, something is definitely wrong.

Yes.

I rarely ran into someone that I couldn't find anything about during the 2020 Census. Maybe once or twice.

[Richard Axtell]

Decertify the election, and we will see how silent they are. They will startle even the stupid Democrat voters, with their shrill screams and unearthly howling.

[JonPreston]

The Wall Street Journal

Do you read this globalist rag before or after you line your bird cage?

[T.B. Yoits]

The Wall Street Journal published their lead editorial today on this exact topic, explaining why it’s a lie.

These companies need to be charged and fined for every penny of such illegal political payments-in-kind. The officers of the company need to be charged and sentenced as well.

[ConservativeInPA]

So then what?

Republican politicians are just another problem that we have to fix. I went for months after the election calling for a new party, but Trump's dedication to the GOP made me change my mind. This is the hill that I will fight on. I will fight every RINO/Assistant Democrat that exists. It is a war that we will win.

[White Lives Matter]

[The Wall Street Journal published their lead editorial today on this exact topic, explaining why it’s a lie.]

How did they say it was a lie?

[babble-on]

This is the title and some extended excerpts, but not the whole piece.

Trump Loses Arizona—Again
He still cries ‘fraud’ even after the audit he demanded found none.

1. Hand recount of Maricopa by the cyber ninjas added 500 votes to Biden's lead.

2."True to his nature, Mr. Trump is claiming vindication based on the audit’s analysis of voter files. As the biggest example, he says Arizona’s results include “23,344 mail-in ballots, despite the person no longer living at that address. Phantom voters!” No. Did he read the report? This figure comes from comparing voter records to a commercial database on change-of-address filings, but look at the caveats:
Cyber Ninjas says errors are normal when using commercial data. Most of these voters barely moved: 15,035 stayed in Maricopa County, and another 1,718 went somewhere else in Arizona. Only 40% were Democrats and 33% Republicans. The audit also admits there are “ways that a voter could receive their ballot which in some cases would not violate the law.”
College students move often, but they could easily pick up ballots that were inadvertently sent home or to old roommates. What about people serving in the military, taking extended vacations, or working remotely? Address changes were probably noisier than usual last year, given how the pandemic scrambled life. The report offers no evidence that any of these people voted illegally.

3.The audit takes aim at other alleged discrepancies, but without providing conclusive explanations, much less proof of wrongdoing. The state’s official results, the report claims, show 3,432 more ballots than can be accounted for using the voter files. Yet in the middle of his presentation Friday, the CEO of Cyber Ninjas, Doug Logan, said Maricopa County recently gave a benign explanation: Arizona has a separate protected voter list, which is used to shield the locations of judges, battered women, and so forth.

4. Another set of 9,041 voters, 34% Democrats to 30% Republicans, show up in the data as having returned multiple ballots. This “could be explained in any of the possible ways,” Cyber Ninjas speculates, ranging from clerical error to fraud. Or not. “The majority of these,” says a spokeswoman for the Maricopa County Elections Department, “are voters that had questionable signatures that were cured or blank signatures that were eventually signed.” In other words: “This shows our Early Voting team was doing their job.”

[kiryandil]

This might be it, but babble has mentioned this twice with no further details to enlighten us:

https://archive.vn/p2608

[seowulf]