Posted on 09/03/2021 7:59:10 PM PDT by Fractal Trader
A new report with detailed data from Public Health England provides some startling numbers.
For the period of February 1 through August 2 there were COVID Delta variant cases for 47,000 people who had received 2 vaccine doses, and for 151,054 people who were unvaccinated.
In the first group of vaccinated people there were a total of 402 deaths, and in the second much larger group of unvaccinated people there were 253 deaths. To get the death rate you divide the number of deaths by the total number of infection cases.
That gives a death rate of .86 percent among the vaccinated and .17 percent among the unvaccinated. That is an amazing difference. The death rate among vaccinated was just over five times greater than that for the unvaccinated.
In other words, unvaccinated people who got infected were enormously safer from death. How can we explain this huge difference in terms of medical science? It should also be noted that it was determined that the measured viral load in both groups was the same.
So, why are vaccinated people dying more frequently than the unvaccinated. Here are some plausible explanations.
First, there is something very dangerous and unsafe in the COVID vaccines associated with spike proteins that are causing people to die at a higher rate. For example, as discussed elsewhere, all current vaccines have been associated with serious blood problems, notably both large and microscopic blood clots. Many people have died from brain bleeds and strokes, for example.
There are also many, many other types of adverse side effects causing a host of medical problems. Two famous virologists warned against using the current vaccines because they are fundamentally unsafe and could be killing people. They loudly proclaimed that the mass vaccination program should be halted. Instead, they advocated use of treatments using generic medicines like ivermectin, as detailed in Pandemic Blunder.
Second, it is reasonable to believe that most unvaccinated people have acquired natural immunity from some prior COVID infection. And that natural immunity is far more protective than the artificial or vaccine immunity obtained from jabs. Yet the US, like many other countries, does not give credit for natural immunity on a par with vaccine immunity when it comes to COVID passports and mandates. Very few nations do the right thing by honestly following the science.
Third, vaccinated people are susceptible to breakthrough infections, which means that they are not protected against infection after they have been originally infected. Phony and dangerous COVID vaccines do not destroy the virus, nor prevent transmitting it to others.
Conclusion The new data from England involving very large numbers of people should be headline news. But the biased and dishonest big media suppress this kind of critical data. Why? Clearly, if vaccinated people die at a much higher rate than unvaccinated people, then why should people be enthusiastic about being vaccinated? They should not. This is especially true for the millions of people who have natural immunity.
It’s probably why they’ll be taking booster shots forever. The vaccinated are like addicts.
Public Health England
Protecting and improving the nation’s health
SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern and
variants under investigation in
England
Technical briefing 20
6 August 2021
This briefing provides an update on previous briefings up to 23 July 2021
________________________________________
Vaccinated 402/47,008 = 0.00855173587
Unvaccinated 253/151,054 = 0.00167489771
________________________________________
pages 18-19 https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1009243/Technical_Briefing_20.pdf
Utter rubbish.
But Israel also has a very low death rate from covid.
They are only comparing two groups of people who already got sick.
Try exposing 1000 vaxed and 1000 unvaxed to Covid and then compare numbers.
Those numbers would be convincing to anyone.
for you baseball fans..johnny bench has covid
It is legit. One minor typo - vaccinated should be “47,008,” instead of “47,000.” I posted the actual English gov source below.
It would be better, but not ideal. The age distribution would still not be comparable, though better than one without a cutoff. A set of random samples with the same median age would be closer yet.
This data says that.
Thank you for posting this but who ever wrote the NOQ article is not schooled in data analytics and we have enough arguments without trying apples to oranges-they used a young age group to seniors-the actual research article makes the opposite argument-unvaccinated die 3x more at same age comparison.
Sorry but this noqreport article will be used against conservatives to show how they like fake news. Why? It is not a correct comparison if you go to the actual research report here:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1009243/Technical_Briefing_20.pdf
You will see that the difference is age. 97% or 147,612 of the 151,054 unvaccinated are under 50 in a low risk group. For the vaccinated it is just 54% under 50 or 25,536
comparing just the high risk group over 50 age: for those un-vaccinated the death rate is about 6% , the vaccinated is 1.8% . Actual numbers below from actual research article:
In un-vaccinated group there were only 3,442 over 50 and 205 deaths, in vaccinated there were 21,472 and a 389 deaths or a death rate of .018 so the death rate is 3 times worse for un-vaccinated over 50.
Imagine that.
It seems *almost* intentional.
/do I really need the sarcasm tag?
Thats not a good comparison as the vaxed/unvaxed sets would differ, as the vax has been applied very disproportionately to the elderly. Two such sets with the same median age would work.
Study bookmark
Here’s a question... how come the COVID vax skeptics are the ones posting data? And the supposedly ‘scientific’ pro COVID vax people on this forum can at best muster scorn and derisive comments? To an outside observer, you blokes seem to have lost the argument.
Has there been an answer to the question of how so many cases were genome sequenced to declare Delta?
I was under the impression Delta was sequenced from samples and extrapolated.
The numbers could be skewed by the fact that the people most likely to have taken the VAX are also the most likely to die from contracting the coof.
The young and robust are not very afraid and less likely to be vaccinated...they are also unlikely to have bad outcomes.
So.. old, obese, frail, diabetic geezers who have been vaccinated are at greater risk simply because of their comorbidity.
I’m just commenting on how statistics can be misleading.. not on the efficacy of the VAX.
yep see my post 30 for details from research article:
comparing just the high risk group over 50 age: for those un-vaccinated the death rate is about 6% , the vaccinated is 1.8% . Actual numbers below from actual research article:
In un-vaccinated group there were only 3,442 over 50 and 205 deaths, in vaccinated there were 21,472 and a 389 deaths or a death rate of .018 so the death rate is 3 times worse for un-vaccinated over 50.
RSV. Interesting. Level headed.
All this other nonsense is supposition.
Some doctors posting here think you will just believe what they claim because, of course, they’re doctors!
Asking them to argue would be an insult.
Bkmk
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.