Thank you for posting this but who ever wrote the NOQ article is not schooled in data analytics and we have enough arguments without trying apples to oranges-they used a young age group to seniors-the actual research article makes the opposite argument-unvaccinated die 3x more at same age comparison.
Sorry but this noqreport article will be used against conservatives to show how they like fake news. Why? It is not a correct comparison if you go to the actual research report here:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1009243/Technical_Briefing_20.pdf
You will see that the difference is age. 97% or 147,612 of the 151,054 unvaccinated are under 50 in a low risk group. For the vaccinated it is just 54% under 50 or 25,536
comparing just the high risk group over 50 age: for those un-vaccinated the death rate is about 6% , the vaccinated is 1.8% . Actual numbers below from actual research article:
In un-vaccinated group there were only 3,442 over 50 and 205 deaths, in vaccinated there were 21,472 and a 389 deaths or a death rate of .018 so the death rate is 3 times worse for un-vaccinated over 50.
So you have better talents than this guy:
A FULL COLLEGE PROFESSOR WITH A TRACK RECORD IN THIS VERY SAME PROBLEM DOMAIN???
Your credentials, please???
Dr. Joel S. Hirschhorn, as a full professor at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, directed a medical research program between the colleges of engineering and medicine. At the Congressional Office of Technology Assessment and the National Governors Association, he directed major health-related studies. He has testified at over 50 U.S. Senate and House hearings and authored hundreds of articles in journals and on websites, plus op-ed articles in major newspapers. He has been an executive volunteer at a major hospital for more than 10 years. His newest book is PandemicBlunder.
So in simple terms, NOQ is making an apples to oranges comparison.