Posted on 07/02/2021 7:34:45 AM PDT by PJ-Comix
The second best thing about the U.S. Supreme Court ruling upholding the Arizona election integrity laws (which the media calls voter restriction laws) is the reaction it caused in the media. So in addition to standing up for the integrity of the state voting system, the SCOTUS also inadvertently provided us with very entertaining hilarious media freakouts.
The SCOTUS cherry on top is revealed at the end of the video.
PING!
Yep, looks like Media Freaks alright
The Rats thought they could quite literally institute election fraud and anyone who dared challenge it would be swamped with racist accusations.
SCOTUS Judge Alito obliterated all of this noise and pointed out states don’t need to wait for election fraud in order to take steps toward election integrity.
The entirety of the race angle was pulverized in the decision.
There’s another big case coming right behind this on Ballot Harvesting.
It’s about to go bye bye. That’s why you hear the howls of pain. Great day.
The big take-away for me is when the hag refers to “another blow to our democracy”. They have been using that word in reference to our Republic for some time now. We need to shut down that word when used to describe our government. We are not, nor have we ever been a democracy.
Things like this just make me smile.
We need to call these “media freakouts” what they really are. Over stepping the boundaries and protections of the First Amendment because the “press” does not uphold the appointed responsibilities agreement with the people to provide them with accuracy and facts, and not inundate the public with sophomoric gossip-columnnistas and opinionated editorials coming from junior staff pukes.
Here’ a link to a FR post with the full decision:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3972815/posts
The law restricts easy voter fraud. It doesn’t restrict voter access...
MSNBC - bimbos, pretentious men and black women in weird wigs...
The total lack of reality by that headline “restricting voting access by people of color” is what astounds me. No one, of any color, has been restricted from voting. Pop out your ID card, show you live there, and you can vote, no restriction whatsoever. But the idea that POCs don’t have enough intelligence to figure that out is pernicious.
Well that's a big change. The judges (not Alito) prior to the election were saying "no standing" because no harm had yet occurred, and afterwards were braying "moot, mooooot" because it was after the fact.
Must have been a good ruling then.
What she gots piled up on her haid?
Saw the headline on today’s newspaper, “The Daily Disappointment”. Yup, it was all about voter restriction, not election integrity.
Their pain is delicious.
For years Joy Reid and other black women 'wore wigs made to look like they had white women's hair'...
So she's struggling with the 'black look'...
Finally someone told her and other black women that appropriating OUR hair was no different than Jim Crow racists doing 'blackface'... (which the black community cried and cried and cried about) The horror of 'appropriation'.. the pain, the insult... All the more stunning when you realize THEY had been doing THE SAME for years.
There's whole departments in stores for 'straightening hair, bleaching skin, and getting the 'white look'... Thank God that's over.
Can you imagine the rage if Walmart carried 'cosmetics and black people's hair wigs' for white people to wear? Anyhow Joy Reid figured out it was insulting - after decades in TV - and she's finally stopped wearing white women's hair...
Next maybe she'll realize white people pay taxes to pay police departments to babysit the black community. Yep, most money and time for police is spent on the ingrates in the black community. Maybe it's time for them to stop glorying their criminals... and start taking some responsibility.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.