Posted on 05/19/2021 9:14:43 AM PDT by CheshireTheCat
Eighty-five percent of the more than 59,000 absentee ballots deposited in Fulton County drop box locations during the November 3, 2020 elections for which Fulton County officials have provided chain of custody documentation were not “immediately transported” from the drop boxes to the registrar’s designee as the Emergency Rule of the State Election Board for Absentee Voting requires. Instead, they took more than one hour to be transferred to election officials.
Remarkably, ballot transfer forms provided to The Georgia Star News by Fulton County officials on May 3, 2021–six months after the November 3, 2020 election, indicate that more than five percent of these absentee ballots were signed in as accepted by registrar designees before they were picked up at drop boxes — a physical impossibility suggesting the time data included on those ballot forms is incorrect.
You can see an example of a ballot transfer form in which the registrar’s designee accepted the ballots before they were picked up at the drop box here....
(Excerpt) Read more at georgiastarnews.com ...
Rules don’t apply when we’re trying to rid ourselves of the hated DJT.
Spooky ballots at a distance.
Anyone can correct me if I am wrong, but they still have NOT explained the video from election night. The way I read both the state and federal law, the elections supervisor conducted an illegal count AFTER she told reporters and poll-watchers that the count was being stopped until the morning for a water leak.
It’s right there on video. Segregated ballots hidden under a table and tablecloth. She herself runs a stack of ballots through the counting machine multiple times. Those ballots were NOT stacked with the other ballots in the corner of the room and based on the entirety of the video those ballots do not even appear to have been logged with the others in the corner or touched all day long after they were brought in.
Why was this not investigated? Rhetorical question I guess.
It was fully investigated, including by the Trump team. I don't like the answer, but it was fully investigated.
The counting area was under full video surveillance the entire day and night. There is video from earlier in the night that shows the workers packing up ballots into the boxes and putting them under the tables, in preparation for leaving for the night. They told reporters that they were leaving for the night, and both the press and the Republican poll watchers went home.
Then the Supervisor got a phone call from the Secretary of State that they had to continue counting. So that's when they got the ballots back out from under the tables, and that is the video everybody saw.
They stole the election in broad daylight. Still, it’s not clear what to do about it.
Strange times indeed.
And weren’t those ‘drop boxes’ funded by Mark Zuckerberg’s CTCL with money going directly to Stacey Abrams brownshirt organization to arrange these ‘drop boxes?’
One can almost hear the Leftist rationalizations and explanations, pooh-poohing these discrepancies.
Thing is, these LAWS were put in place for SPECIFIC reasons.
They didn’t just have people sitting around a table making them up out of thin air as if they were social distancing or mask wearing laws.
Those laws were set at an hour...not SIX days, not SIX hours...not TWO hours. One hour.
And the reason was to prevent fraud.
Stacy Abrams and her ilk ballot harvesting. Damn thieving democrats.
Spooky ballots at a distance.
—
Quantum engagement ballots.
Okay, but again, federal and state election law states ballots should only be counted in the presence of observers/media.
I watched the longest video posted and read a summary from those who saw the video from the entire day and it was not clear to me when the ballots were placed under the table. Furthermore, explain the body language.
She tells everyone to leave. They are sitting in the room like a DOT road crew playing on their phones doing nothing. She physically walks over to the tape line where observers had been and looks down the hallway (?) where nobody was located. She then walks back towards the others in the room and they spring to life like a fast food staff at lunch hour.
Does that look right? FWIW - the Sec of State provided several different explanations of what happened and how/why would the Sec of State tell them to violate election law?
If you watch the video of the counting machines the workers put one stack through the machine one time. Why does she put the same stack through the machine at least 3 times? That was not similar to what the video showed others doing on that day.
Because they’re DEMONCRAPS silly !
Oh ! And BLACK FEMALE Demoncats !
You can’t ever even ACCUSE them of wrongdoing. Or your RACIST !
Yes, WTH?
Ruby Freeman and her daughter found those ballots after everyone left the facility...do to a broken water main that didn’t break.
5.56mm
Then, there are those superstring ballots...
Then the Supervisor got a phone call from the Secretary of State that they had to continue counting. So that’s when they got the ballots back out from under the tables, and that is the video everybody saw.
************
That’s somewhat the explanation I read, But as I understand it, it is still illegal to enter the ballots into the machines without poll watchers there.
So, Time Travel IS possible after all!....................
Lacking any deep investigation into this, the context and the content of the video it is rational to have concluded fraud. It would be similarly rational to have expected a criminal investigation, prosecutions and mandating of a highly supervised re-vote.
This is what I saw from the hearings:
1. Video of ballots being sneaked into the building and hidden underneath a table.
2. A flood was reported, election workers evacuated and counting stopped.
3. Very shortly thereafter, a handful of election workers returned. These select workers did not include observers or other staff. Neither party was notified of this ‘special team’ would continue counting.
4. Votes hidden underneath a table were pulled out, and counted.
5. Later, after this task was completed, the process returned to business as usual when staff returned. Neither party was notified that counting had privately continued.
NOTHING in this scenario passes the sniff test. The flood itself has been questioned as well, and accounts from the building service saw a minor leak.
My understanding of this s scenario could be flawed. However, there is so much about this incident that REASONABLY provides doubt about a lawful and fair counting process. It doesn’t make you a conspiracy theorist to question a bullshit evacuation, retrieval of hidden votes underneath a table, and the ‘special’ crew that was called to secretly count them.
Then there’s the voting machines...
There’s that 5-6 percent cheat margin padding showing up again.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.