Posted on 05/18/2021 10:12:34 AM PDT by TedMartin
From Greg Burt/CFC
SACRAMENTO - The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and State Sen. Scott Wiener (D- San Francisco) have teamed up on a bill making its way through the legislature to decriminalize streetwalkers hanging out on street corners.
Wiener, who wants to make prostitution legal, says California police officers shouldn’t assume scantily clad women hanging out on street corners and talking to men driving by in cars are involved in prostitution.
“Arrests… are based on an officer’s subjective perception of whether a person is ‘acting like’ they intend to engage in sex work,” Wiener said in a press release.
Los Angeles Sheriff Alex Villanueva disputes this characterization and says the “underlying root” of the “loitering with the intent to commit prostitution” law is to “target sex buyers who seek to exploit.”
In his letter of opposition to SB 357, Villanueva explained the current loitering law, approved by the California legislature in 1995, helps police “keep prostitutes from hanging around public places, business, and residential communities, which can breed crime and drug use.”
Like Wiener, one of the bill’s sponsors, the ACLU of California, argues that loitering laws “create opportunities” for police to discriminate against racial and sexual minorities. As evidence, the ACLU wrote that black adults accounted for 56 percent of those charged with loitering for prostitution in Los Angeles between 2017 and 2019, “despite only making up 8.9 percent of the city’s population.”
While not discussing other causes or remedies for getting rid of this disparity, Wiener and the ACLU conclude getting rid of the loitering law is the only solution. But this conclusion is better understood when considering that Wiener and the ACLU have advocated for the complete legalization of prostitution.
One of the surprising supporters of SB 357 is the Coalition to Abolish Slavery and Trafficking, also known as CAST, which is known in California for helping women escape lives of prostitution by providing a variety of services including counseling, housing, mentoring, and legal resources.
The organization’s letter of support parroted the language used in the ACLU opposition letter, pointing towards the discriminatory way that police use the law to target minorities. CAST also said the loitering law doesn’t help trafficked women.
“Arresting sex workers or persons perceived to be sex workers creates environments where people, including survivors, will be arrested and creates barriers to accessing safe housing, legal employment, and overall quality of life,” wrote Leigh LaChappelle, CAST’s Associate Director of Survivor Advocacy.
“We, as an organization, who have been fighting to end sex trafficking for over 12 years in Central and Southern California, feel that repealing or amending this law will give traffickers more opportunities to place victims of sex trafficking on the street for sale,” Bennett said.
“Although not all sex workers are trafficked, our research shows that seven out of ten prostitutes are victims of sex trafficking. With more law enforcement officers being trained in identifying victims, this change to the law will eliminate the ability to ascertain whether or not an individual is on the street by choice or if someone is profiting off of them.”
San Francisco’s current district attorney, Chesa Boudin, promised when elected in 2019 to not prosecute cases involving quality-of-life crimes. Crimes such as public camping, offering or soliciting sex, public urination, blocking a sidewalk, etc., should not and will not be prosecuted," he said, according to Newsweek.
Now Wiener seems to want the rest of the state to follow San Francisco’s example. The bill has already passed the Senate Public Safety Committee and is now in the Senate Appropriation Committee. A decision on whether it will move forward to the Senate floor will be made on Thursday, May 20th.
Greg Burt is Director of Capitol Engagement for the California Family Council (www.californiafamily.org). He can be reached at gregb@californiafamily.org or (949) 244-2080.
They have socialized medicine leftover from the communist days (poor quality) but if the prostitutes pay taxes, then they get regular checkups.
A woman can work as an escort or massage in their own home.
Pimps and brothels are not allowed.
But it is a pretty good system and Hungary has some of the nicest and healthiest prostitutes in the world!
Will this be bruce jenner’s side job?
In California it isn’t necessarily women on the streetcorners. Whether they are wearing dresses or trousers or shorts.
Will it be set up like Lyft or Uber?
You only get serviced by first available agent?
Prices rise based on local market demand at that hour?
Does either party have right of refusal in the deal or must both client and hooker purchase/provide service without discrmination on either party’s behalf?
HAHAHA! That is one of the funniest things I’ve seen on the internet.
Unionized.
The whore with the most seniority gets priority.
To force calling them “hook up girls” or “girlfriends?”
Let me put it this way, I would not do them even with someone else’s.
I remember that joke.
The church in Corinth had to live amongst even more vile stuff.
Since the California legislature is packed with whores that think they’re not criminals, this action stands to reason.
Theoretically, they would make it more difficult to have premarital sex, thus incentivizing men to get married and have children and potentially lead productive lives. Efficacy is debatable. Whether prostitution laws can be effective at this purpose in the modern era is even more debatable.
De criminalize?
Newsom will make them free.
Next it’ll be listed as a a vocation for college age gals.
Europe learned long ago that licensed brothels are the way to go, not street hooking. Brothels provide health checks, condoms, even drug abuse treatment that street hookers do not get. Plus street hookers means pimps, a nasty and violent lot.
Most likely, those women hanging out the street corners discuss latest literary offerings by Barnes & Noble with men in cars...
We need visual evidence to support that statement
“Our laws should protect the LGBTQ community and communities of color, and not criminalize sex workers, trans people and brown and black people for quite literally walking around or dressing in a certain way.”
Their victim hierarchy is getting more and more complicated. I would have just stuck with the word “degenerates”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.