Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bill would force California stores to sell gender fluid clothes
PressCalifornia.com ^ | 5/11/21 | Greg Burt

Posted on 05/11/2021 3:47:42 PM PDT by TedMartin

From Greg Burt

SACRAMENTO - Gender-fluid clothing entrepreneur Rob Smith opened the world’s first gender-free store in New York three years ago with an ambitious goal to spread his non-binary message and clothes into every retail space around the world.

But this LGBTQ activist fashion designer has run into a problem. He can’t seem to get big-box retailers in the United States to display his “The Phluid Project” line of clothes into their brick-and-mortar stores as much as he would like.

For more independent news, see our homepage at PressCalifornia.com.

Under the guise of ridding big box stores of harmful gender stereotypes, Smith convinced the California Legislative LGBT Caucus Chair Evan Low (D-San Jose) to introduce a bill to punish companies with fines if they don’t make room for the kind of products Smith sells.

Smith’s bill has easily passed through two Assembly committees with a hearing in the Assembly Appropriations Committee set for Wednesday.

Similar bill shelved by the pandemic

Low originally introduced this legislative proposal last year, as AB 2826. This bill would have outlawed retail stores from displaying any children’s clothes and toys according to sex, but the legislation never got a hearing with pandemic-related bills receiving priority last year. This year’s bill, AB 1084, is a little less demanding. Instead of outlawing all displays of boys and girls toys and clothes, this bill instead requires retail department stores with 500 or more employees to maintain a gender-neutral section for childcare care items, children’s clothing, and toys that will not separate items by sex.

In testimony before the Assembly Judiciary Committee on April 28, Smith explained he really wanted the state to outlaw boy and girl signage and “let kids shop where they want,” but he sees AB 1084 as a good first step.

Smith believes stores need to create “safe” and “affirming” gender-neutral spaces to protect kids from “gender stereotypes that cause serious, long-lasting harm.”

'Follow your dreams' sign hurts girls?

He specifically mentioned harmful gendered sales signs he recently saw in a retail store. While marketing messaging in the girl's sections had signs that said “smile,” “follow your dreams,” and “be kind,” the signs promoting products marketed to boys read, “Legend,” “You are epic,” and “future hero.”

(Watch the AB 1084 Assembly Judiciary Hearing here)

So far the bill passed through the Assembly Business and Professions Committee with 11 voting yes, 4 voting, no and 4 not voting, while it passed through the Assembly Judiciary Committee with a vote of 7 yes votes, 3 no votes, and 1 not voting.

Only Democrat legislators have voted yes so far. AB 1084 has a good chance of passing through the Assembly Appropriation hearing on Wednesday with the support Chair, Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez, already saying she approved of the bill, but wished it went further.

Lawmaker wants to ensure pink dresses for boys

“I like where you are going with this bill,” Gonzales said during the Assembly Judiciary Committee, but “why don’t you combine all the girls' and boys' clothes with no designation.”

With the bill letting retail stores decide what clothes would go into a gender-neutral section, Gonzales was concerned it would be full of clothes that “tended to be boyish for girls.” She wanted to make sure stores would include clothes for boys that wanted to wear “a pink shirt or a dress.”

Gonzalez also said she hopes this bill was just the first step. “Let's get rid of (gendered) labels while we are at it,” she said. Bill author Low responded that “he would like to go this way,” but he was trying to be less “prescriptive” and let retailers make some of these decisions.

With the explosion of gender transitioning clinics for kids over the past decade, with the state legislature increasingly requiring affirmation of a minor’s gender identity in K-12 public schools, and with more and more kids identifying as a gender other than male or female, it’s no wonder that an entrepreneur and activist like Rob Smith would want to cash in on the new fashion trend.

Mandate called 'a violation of free speech'

Target is already selling his “The Phluid Project” clothes online, but when you look for products sold at Target brick-and-mortar stores in the Sacramento region, only a few shirts are available. Walmart seems to only sell Phluid Project clothes online in the Sacramento area.

“You have to give Rob Smith credit; he’s found quite an audacious marketing plan in asking Sacramento to force California retailers to make room for his products,” said California Family Council President Jonathan Keller.

“But activists and state legislators have no right to force retailers to espouse government-approved messages about gender. It’s a violation of free speech and it’s just plain wrong.”

Greg Burt is Director of Capitol Engagement for the California Family Council). He can be reached at gregb@californiafamily.org or (949) 244-2080.


TOPICS: Government; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: california; didyousearch; duplicate; gender; lgbtq; sacramento
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

1 posted on 05/11/2021 3:47:42 PM PDT by TedMartin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TedMartin

There better not be a TRACE of gender fluid on any clothes I buy. That’s gross. What’s wrong with these people?


2 posted on 05/11/2021 3:49:17 PM PDT by BipolarBob (This is my chainsaw. There are many like it but this one is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TedMartin

I’ve got your gender fluid right here, Honey.


3 posted on 05/11/2021 3:51:57 PM PDT by Veggie Todd (Religion. It's like a History class. Without the facts. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TedMartin

How Gay


4 posted on 05/11/2021 3:52:21 PM PDT by al baby (Hi Mom Hi Dad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: al baby

Down they shop at the Clown Store


5 posted on 05/11/2021 3:53:54 PM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TedMartin

No problem.

Flannel shirts, khaki pants, grannie panties and comfortable shoes for the “men” and muumu’s and mens’s size 11 high heels for the “woman”.

My work is done, here.


6 posted on 05/11/2021 3:54:39 PM PDT by UNGN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TedMartin

No problem.

Flannel shirts, khaki pants, grannie panties and comfortable shoes for the “men” and muumu’s and mens’s size 11 high heels for the “woman”.

My work is done, here.


7 posted on 05/11/2021 3:54:39 PM PDT by UNGN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TedMartin
Liquid clothes will be cool.

Somebody get Elon Musk busy inventing them.

8 posted on 05/11/2021 3:55:06 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TedMartin

Would be an interesting idea to let the market decide.


9 posted on 05/11/2021 3:55:11 PM PDT by FatherofFive (We support Trump. Not the GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TedMartin

Now I can get a moo moo that fits.


10 posted on 05/11/2021 3:56:01 PM PDT by ptsal (Vote R.E.D. >>>Remove Every Democrat ***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TedMartin

How can a retailor be forced to sell something they don’t want to sell???


11 posted on 05/11/2021 3:58:14 PM PDT by JBW1949 (I'm really PC.....Patriotically Correct)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UNGN

I’m thinking more along the lines of a bag with holes cut out.


12 posted on 05/11/2021 3:58:42 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ptsal

I have never heard of free markets, but assuming there is demand?


13 posted on 05/11/2021 3:59:46 PM PDT by algore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TedMartin; lightman

What are “gender fluid” clothes? Whatever Megan Rohrer wears?

https://www.npr.org/2021/05/09/995271758/megan-rohrer-elected-as-1st-openly-transgender-bishop-in-u-s-lutheran-church

PHOOEY!!!!

Nevertheless, Christ is Risen!!!! And HE is the Victor!!!!


14 posted on 05/11/2021 4:00:33 PM PDT by Honorary Serb (Kosovo is Serbia! Free Srpska! Abolish ICTY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JBW1949

By not giving you a retail license. Or taxing you for not complying to their “law”. That’s what they did for Obamacare.


15 posted on 05/11/2021 4:01:47 PM PDT by JoJo2020 (I take a knee to God only!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TedMartin

If it’s such a good idea why doesn’t this person open their own stores and sell on the internet instead of forcing others to do his bidding. If the market is ready fir the clothes, they’ll sell and other companies will be clamoring to carry the designs or even start to create their own lines and complete in the marketplace. It always amazes me how libs don’t believe in competition but rather subjugation and force.


16 posted on 05/11/2021 4:01:57 PM PDT by The Louiswu ((.....................insert tagline here.......................))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TedMartin
So:

Shift_juice

17 posted on 05/11/2021 4:03:12 PM PDT by SkyDancer (If At First You Don't Succeed ~ So Much For Skydiving)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BipolarBob
"There better not be a TRACE of gender fluid on any clothes I buy. That’s gross. What’s wrong with these people?"

How could you tell?


18 posted on 05/11/2021 4:03:15 PM PDT by TexasGator (Z1z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JoJo2020

Doesn’t sound legal...


19 posted on 05/11/2021 4:04:13 PM PDT by JBW1949 (I'm really PC.....Patriotically Correct)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: JBW1949

Doesn’t sound legal...


It is California. It is legal if they say it is legal...meanwhile stores will close and the owners will move to another state.


20 posted on 05/11/2021 4:10:49 PM PDT by CIB-173RDABN (I am not an expert in anything, and my opinion is just that, an opinion. I may be wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson