Posted on 02/17/2021 5:18:56 AM PST by Roman_War_Criminal
It appears the Communist Chinese Party puppet Biden regime is coming after anyone who is in opposition to its ideology, plans, and actions. From military purges of constitutionalists/conservatives to ordinary citizens who espouse support for the Constitution and a reformation to founding and religious principles, the CCP Biden regime is pushing full steam ahead to criminalize freedoms and liberties. As of Thursday, February 11, 2021, The Washington Times reported the target is now law enforcement.
America’s cops are the victims of “McCarthyism from the left,” says a growing chorus of police officers bucking the narrative that White supremacists have infiltrated law enforcement agencies.
While officers concede some White supremacists may have entered their ranks, they say civil rights groups insisting it’s a ticking time bomb have exaggerated those numbers.
(Excerpt) Read more at dcdirtylaundry.com ...
THE STENCH OF CHICAGO SEWERS AND WHO CRAWLED OUT OF IT IS STRONG HERE:
EVIDENCE THAT OBAMA’S FILTHY HAND IS STILL IN THE TILL
===================READ ON =====================
CIRCA 2009-—OBAMA’S DHS Secy Napolitano stands by controversial report naming “extremists”
By Eli Lake and Audrey Hudson - The Washington Times Thursday, April 16, 2009
Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said Wednesday that she was briefed before the release of a controversial intelligence assessment and that she stands by the report, which lists returning veterans among terrorist risks to the U.S. But the top House Democrat with oversight of the Department of Homeland Security said in a letter to Ms. Napolitano that he was “dumbfounded” that such a report would be issued.
“This report appears to raise significant issues involving the privacy and civil liberties of many Americans - including war veterans,” said Rep. Bennie Thompson of Mississippi, chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, in his letter sent Tuesday night.
The letter was representative of a public furor over the nine-page document since its existence was reported in The Washington Times on Tuesday. In her statement Wednesday, Ms. Napolitano defended the report, which says “rightwing extremism” may include groups opposed to abortion and immigration, as merely one among several threat assessments. But she agreed to meet with the head of the American Legion, who had expressed anger over the report, when she returns to Washington next week from a tour of the U.S.-Mexico border.
“The document on right-wing extremism sent last week by this department’s Office of Intelligence and Analysis is one in an ongoing series of assessments to provide situational awareness to state, local and tribal law enforcement agencies on the phenomenon and trends of violent radicalization in the United States,” Ms. Napolitano said in her statement. “I was briefed on the general topic, which is one that struck a nerve as someone personally involved in the Timothy McVeigh prosecution,” Ms. Napolitano said. • Click here to download a PDF of the report. Ms. Napolitano insisted that the department was not planning on engaging in any form of ideological profiling. “Let me be very clear: We monitor the risks of violent extremism taking root here in the United States. We don’t have the luxury of focusing our efforts on one group; we must protect the country from terrorism whether foreign or homegrown, and regardless of the ideology that motivates its violence,” Ms. Napolitano said.
“We are on the lookout for criminal and terrorist activity but we do not - nor will we ever - monitor ideology or political beliefs. We take seriously our responsibility to protect the civil rights and liberties of the American people, including subjecting our activities to rigorous oversight from numerous internal and external sources.”
The Times reported Tuesday that the department’s Office of Intelligence and Analysis (I&A) issued April 7 the nine-page document titled “Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment.” Outcry from veterans groups, Republican lawmakers and conservative activists followed, but the reaction spread Wednesday to Democratic lawmakers and liberal-leaning groups.
In his letter to Ms. Napolitano, Mr. Thompson demanded that Homeland Security officials explain how and why they wrote the report and whether it poses any threat to civil liberties. “As I am certain you agree, freedom of association and freedom of speech are guaranteed to all Americans - whether a person’s beliefs, whatever their political orientation, are ‘extremist’ or not,” Mr. Thompson said. Mr. Thompson said the report “blurred the line,” and that he is “disappointed and surprised that the department would allow this report to be disseminated” to law enforcement officials nationwide.
Homeland Security officials have declined to say who wrote report, except that it was a career official and not a political appointee. Only three employees are listed in the Federal Yellow Book as working for the I&A office - acting Undersecretary Roger Mackin and two executive assistants.
Mr. Thompson’s letter said, “I am particularly struck by the report’s conclusion which states that I&A ‘will be working with its state and local partners over the next several months to ascertain with greater regional specificity the rise in right-wing extremist activity in the United States with a particular emphasis on the political, economic, and social factors that drive right-wing extremist radicalization.’ ” He demanded to know what types of activities the Homeland Security Department had planned for “the next several months.”
“Rightwing extremism,” the report said in a footnote on Page 2, goes beyond religious and racial hate groups and extends to “those that are mainly anti-government, rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority, or rejecting government authority entirely.” “It may include groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration,” said the report, which also listed gun owners and veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars as potential risks.
The assessment is not the first Homeland Security product to examine threats based on political extremism. In January, the department sent law enforcement officials an assessment of cyberterrorism threats from such left-leaning sources as environmental, animal rights and anarchist groups. Mike German, policy counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union and a former FBI agent, said his organization was concerned about law enforcement agencies’ focus on radicalization, regardless of the specific ideology. “Certainly, the right-wing report is focused far too much on rhetoric and things people say and things people think rather than on criminal activity and the people involved in criminal activity,” he said. “There is plenty of crime out there for federal, state and local law enforcement to worry about. They don’t need to invent threats that they have no factual basis for supporting.”
The American Legion on Tuesday said the latest report unfairly stereotypes veterans. “I am aware of the letter from American Legion National Commander [David K.] Rehbein, and my staff has already contacted him to set up a meeting next week once I return from travel. I will tell him face-to-face that we honor veterans at DHS and employ thousands across the department, up to and including the Deputy Secretary,” Ms. Napolitano said.
“As the department responsible for protecting the homeland, DHS will continue to work with its state and local partners to prevent and protect against the potential threat to the United States associated with any rise in violent extremist activity,” Ms. Napolitano said.
Asked about the report at Wednesday’s White House briefing, press secretary Robert Gibbs said he has not spoken with President Obama specifically about it. “Without getting into the report, I think the president works hard every day to make sure that all Americans are safe and secure,” Mr. Gibbs said.
“And I would say that, as it relates to some aspect of the report, that the president believes those who serve our country represent the very best of it,” Mr. Gibbs said.
House Minority Leader John A. Boehner, Ohio Republican, said Wednesday that the department owes veterans an apology. “To characterize men and women returning home after defending our country as potential terrorists is offensive and unacceptable,” he said. “Everyone agrees that the department should be focused on protecting America, but using such broad-based generalizations about the American people is simply outrageous.”
Rep. Steve Buyer of Indiana, the ranking Republican on the House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, called it “inconceivable” that the Obama administration would categorize veterans as a potential threat. “This kind of mischaracterization can lead to discrimination against veterans in our society, especially in the job market,” Mr. Buyer said. “Vietnam veterans were subjected to this unfair treatment, and I call upon President Obama and members of Congress to refute any similar stereotyping of Iraq and Afghanistan veterans.” • Jon Ward contributed to this report. Copyright © 2021 The Washington Times, LLC.
RELATED STORIES:
• Federal agency warns of radicals on right
• Obama promises new beginning ahead of trip
I bet those numbers are very, very few. Not worth giving up *any* freedom over!!
White Supremacists? What is all this paranoia about White Supremacy all of a sudden?
I think we need to worry about Yellow Supremacists more than White ones.
What percent of the KKK are members of the FBI?
They need to purge their own bigoted and manipulative ranks.
White Supremacists? What is all this paranoia about White Supremacy all of a sudden?
-
When you read “White Supremacists” translate to white culture. To the left all white culture must be removed going as far back as the ancient Greeks.
There was an “ethics” manager at my General Dynamics facility. His job had nothing to do “ethics.” He was the diversity and political correctness manager. When I was brought up on ethics charges, having nothing to do with the traditional definition of ethics, I asked my boss’, boss’, boss to arrange an interview between the three of us. The ethics charge was sexual harassment. Although the woman involved said there was no harassment, an uninvolved third party had said, “You know, if someone who didn’t know better had witnessed the scene, THEY might have thought it was sexual harassments. (That was actually in the report I forced them to read to me. I wasn’t allowed to even touch the report, probably for fear I’d insist on taking it with me and give it to a lawyer.)
Normally, I would have had zero rights to even review the charges. The determination of my fate was made by three ethics managers from other facilities who did so from the written report of our ethics manager. No witnesses were called. I was not allowed a defense. It was only because my august uber-boss had gotten involved that I was even allowed to have a discussion about the situation. Believe me, the ethics manager was uncomfortable actually facing me and trying to explain the situation.
I told you all of that to tell you this. I asked him what his goals and objectives were for the ethics job. Because the other boss already knew, he had to answer. His goal was to fire three people for “ethics” violations by the end of the year. I sat wide-eyed and disbelieving. Because, what if there were no ethics violations? Well, that would mean he wouldn’t get his performance bonus. I turned to the bosses’s boss and said, “You realize, in a few years there will only be you and him and he’ll fire you for an ethics violation.” (In reality, that would never happen. Management was exempt. One of the top managers was seen at a local club snorting lines of cocaine. His cocaine problem was widely known and nothing was done.)
So, what if there are no white supremacist’s? I guarantee you, they will find them even if there are none. That’s how this works. These are Stalin’s political commissars updated to V4.5.
so the FIB goes after LEO instead
of serial child rapists (who ties the babies down)
and send (indirectly) the VIDEOS to the FIB to watch
for YEARS!!!!,
and instead of terrorists (eg. Boston after 3 warnings)
given their attacks on Pres. Trump year after year,
the FIB does not work for Americans or the innocent
or the children and women sold and raped repeatedly.
McCarthy was right as proven by Soviet archives. See Blacklisted by History.
The left wants like-minded law enforcement that will excuse their acts and crack down on their opposition. They want a radical social justice police force and what we have now is not that. The left would prefer to have a BLM or ANTIFA police force. They need the existing police gone so they can take over.
So obviously wanting to live in a majority white neighborhood with majority-white schools and shopping makes me a white supremacist. Whatever.
Wow. That’s a very frightening story. And now they’ve moved beyond sexual harassment and have about a million things they can get you on.
Companies and universities, etc. all have officers for something called I&D now, “Inclusion and Diversity,” which has moved the possibilities up exponentially. There’s practically nothing you can say or do that’s not going to get you in trouble now.
There, fixed that.
White supremist = Anyone who voted for Trump no matter their color.
It’s quite obvious what is happening here. The “3 letter depts” were all weaponized during Obama’s 8 years. They did everything they could to take down PDJT but were fearful as he was POTUS. Now enters the Biden regime which is completely compromised and submissive to the CCP.
As this is recognized by regular every day Americans we’re going to speak up and want to do something about this. They’re trying to get ahead of it all by labeling such people as “white supremacists” to justify cancelling them. Patriots cannot be in our military or the police force.
No wonder the White House is Fort Knox. The D’s still living in The Matrix will actually believe that half the country are white supremacists. It’s all insane.
Ya.....anybody Registered GOP in the voter rolls....
These are the “Good” FBI guys that did and said nothing during the coup of Trump.
The purpose is to criminalize political dissent. Also, as the “white supremacists” are purged, they can be replaced with Social Justice Warriors”.
Demonize-Ostracize-Criminalize
We are in stage three. There will be a purge in every institution.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.