Skip to comments.
Video: Biden Press Secretary Jen Psaki gets upset because a reporter asked her when the laid off oil workers will get the green energy jobs that Biden had promised them
wordpress ^
| February 8, 2021
| Dan from Squirrel Hill
Posted on 02/08/2021 3:51:48 PM PST by grundle
Video: Biden Press Secretary Jen Psaki gets upset because a reporter asked her when the laid off oil workers will get the green energy jobs that Biden had promised them
A reporter asked Jen Psaki when the laid off oil workers will get the green jobs that Biden had promised them.
Psaki refused to cite any specific date.
She even seems to be mad that the reporter would ask such a question.
I think it was a great question:
https://twitter.com/CurtisHouck/status/1358830482167848962
Here is a blog post that I wrote about Democrats’ previous broken promises about green energy jobs.
TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: economy; jenpsaki; peterdoocy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 next last
To: grundle
"What? Well, um...we didn't actually really MEAN that when we promised it. You didn't know that?"
21
posted on
02/08/2021 4:06:11 PM PST
by
rlmorel
("I’d rather enjoy a risky freedom than a safe servitude." Robby Dinero, USMC Veteran, Gym Owner)
To: SSS Two
The question presumes the Biden regime took this into consideration and has an outlook that would provide this information.
Telling workers to “learn code” or “build solar panels” is what is irresponsible.
Biden is a leftard buffoon as is his entire socialist cabinet.
22
posted on
02/08/2021 4:06:19 PM PST
by
eyedigress
(Trump is my President!)
To: grundle
I hear Solyindra has a huge stock of glass tubing....just right for making solar heat collection systems.
23
posted on
02/08/2021 4:07:07 PM PST
by
spokeshave
(White Confederate statue kills black man......Another month of protests.... (HT to seawolf101))
To: RooRoobird20
Peter Doocey asked a perfectly reasonable and valid question. Are you under the impression that there will be a one-for-one trade-off between lost pipeline jobs and newly created green jobs? Seriously? If the premise is preposterous, so is the question.
24
posted on
02/08/2021 4:07:42 PM PST
by
SSS Two
To: j.havenfarm
You mean the @land mines” per VP Harris? These people are wicked, they really are. We’re talking about real people who need to feed real families, and these bastards don’t care if they have work or not They see the lowly worker masses like the old Soviets did and the current Chinese Communists do. Expendable, sometimes aggravating, useful for cheering group photos with the communist leader smiling and raising his arm.
If too many demand worthwhile jobs and consumer goods for their families then many will "disappear." Hondurans and Chileans can be plugged in as replacements for them.
25
posted on
02/08/2021 4:07:46 PM PST
by
frank ballenger
(End vote fraud, harvesting,non-citizen voting & leftist media news censorship or we are finished.)
To: C210N
When are the Mine workers going to get their assignments as to which Mine Fields need de-mining? Funny one.
That's the sort of land mine question that could blow up in their faces.
26
posted on
02/08/2021 4:09:14 PM PST
by
frank ballenger
(End vote fraud, harvesting,non-citizen voting & leftist media news censorship or we are finished.)
To: j.havenfarm
These people are wicked, they really are. We’re talking about real people who need to feed real families, and these bastards don’t care if they have work or not It's pretty wild that we're dealing with Communists who have nothing but contempt for the deplorable working class. They don't know any workers. They don't understand any workers. And they don't want to. Workers are surplus population. Can't we just get rid of them? Isn't that the best way to have a Communist paradise?
27
posted on
02/08/2021 4:09:19 PM PST
by
ClearCase_guy
("I see you did something -- why you so racist?")
To: grundle

Never in any mood for hardball questions.
28
posted on
02/08/2021 4:09:27 PM PST
by
Slyfox
(Not my circus, not my monkeys )
To: grundle
Her answer was "Why don't you come back tomorrow with your numbers of how many people lost their jobs..."
One would think the reporter would say "No, you're the government, not me. What was YOUR estimate of how many jobs would be lost by this executive order?"
-PJ
29
posted on
02/08/2021 4:10:20 PM PST
by
Political Junkie Too
(Freedom of the press is the People's right to publish, not CNN's right to the 1st question.)
To: rlmorel
Right. That is just something they say to pretend there is no downside to their policies
30
posted on
02/08/2021 4:10:44 PM PST
by
joshua c
(Dump them all. Twitter, Facebook, Google, Amazon, cable tv, natl name brands)
To: HypatiaTaught
31
posted on
02/08/2021 4:11:19 PM PST
by
CJ Wolf
(#wwg1wga #Godwins; what is scarier than offensive words? Not being able to say them.. )
To: eastforker
Didn’t know it was Peter. He is a good guy thought it was one of the run of the mill CNN reporters. Stopped watching the pressers long ago as with FOX.
32
posted on
02/08/2021 4:11:32 PM PST
by
duckman
( Not tired of winning!)
To: eastforker
Peter Doocey is not a rat reporter. He has been asking tough questions to Biden all through his campaign.
Yes, Peter Doocey is about the only reporter consistently asking tough questions. What I love about him is even though the questions are tough, he’s always polite and respectful. He’s the only reporter who asked Plugs last year about his new grandchild—you know, the one whose mother was a stripper and Hunter wouldn’t take a paternity test LMAO? He’s asked Plugs questions over and over again about coke-snorting pedophile Hunter Biden. Plugs got irritated one time and said to Peter, “You’re a one horse pony!” (another dementia moment on the campaign trail, fake news looks the other way)
To: grundle
"... when the laid off oil workers will get the green energy jobs that Biden had promised them..."
34
posted on
02/08/2021 4:12:37 PM PST
by
Bonemaker
(invictus maneo)
To: frank ballenger
The soviet workers motto. “At least I have job”.
35
posted on
02/08/2021 4:12:59 PM PST
by
CJ Wolf
(#wwg1wga #Godwins; what is scarier than offensive words? Not being able to say them.. )
To: SSS Two
What Doocy was doing was calling the Biden admin out on their hypocrisy and lie.
They promised green jobs...so where are they?
I'm sure Doocy understood the underlying premise of the debate and knew that no green jobs were going to materialize. Sometimes, direct questions that highlight the absurdity of the opposition's position are the best.
To: SSS Two
Name ONE green job created.
37
posted on
02/08/2021 4:14:48 PM PST
by
eyedigress
(Trump is my President!)
To: grundle
Kayleigh McEnany made it look so easy (and against a sea of seething, hostile deranged leftists who have no regard for people who disagree with them. Did I mention Acosta?)
This new one will alternate between tantrums, sullen pouting and then crying spells. Like any 14 year old.
Her peak was probably “What is it like working for a great man like President Biden every day?” and “How are the Biden dogs adjusting to their new lives?”
38
posted on
02/08/2021 4:15:57 PM PST
by
frank ballenger
(End vote fraud, harvesting,non-citizen voting & leftist media news censorship or we are finished.)
To: SSS Two
What’s preposterous and outrageous is how dismissive Plugs Biden is about the impact of his EO’s on American workers.
Plugs has said the jobs he’s killing will lead to new jobs for those who lost their jobs. That’s pretty much saying there IS a 1:1 for old vs new jobs, which we all know is a BIG FAT LIE.
But that’s what Plugs does best—HE LIES.
To: eyedigress
Green jobs will be created — but in China, not here.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson