Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Now the Democrat Attorneys General Align with Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin and Georgia – Nearly Every State Has Picked Sides
GP ^ | 12/10/20 | Joe Hoft

Posted on 12/10/2020 7:39:17 PM PST by Enlightened1

The Texas case against Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin and Georgia has exploded.  Now nearly the entire country is picking sides. 

The whole country knows now that the state of Texas sued Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin on Monday night in the US Supreme Court challenging their unlawful election procedures.

Texas argued these four states violated the US Constitution because they made changes to voting rules and procedures through the courts or through executive actions. But these states did not make the changes through the state legislatures as spelled out in the US Constitution.

We reported earlier today that President Trump joined Texas in suing the four states being sued by Texas.

Last night we reported 18 states have to date joined Texas in their case against the four states:

Next we reported that 106 US House Republicans have signed a brief backing Texas in this case (the list should be over 200):

And then this afternoon, the Pennsylvania House joined the case:

Now blue states and a couple territories have gotten involved and have joined Pennsylvania, Michigan, Georgia and Wisconsin.  They are fine with massive corruption as long as they gain power:

 

In addition to the above, Ohio joined Texas today and Wyoming decided to stay out of it.  Iowa, Kentucky, Alaska and Idaho have decided to stay out of the case as well.  Nearly the entire country is in the game now.  (see above for map).

The number of states and entities joining Texas in their suit against the big four states involved in stealing the 2020 election continues to grow. This case isn’t bogus or seditious, this case is valid and that is why states are picking sides.


(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: bloggers; election2020; lawsuit; scotus; states; steal; supremecourt; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

1 posted on 12/10/2020 7:39:17 PM PST by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: fatima; Fresh Wind; st.eqed; xsmommy; House Atreides; Nowhere Man; PaulZe; brityank; Physicist; ...

Pennsylvania Ping!

Please ping me with articles of interest.

FReepmail me to be added to the list.

2 posted on 12/10/2020 7:40:24 PM PST by lightman (I am a binary Trinitarian. Deal with it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

3 posted on 12/10/2020 7:40:38 PM PST by Enlightened1 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lightman
Idaho Lt. Governor and Legislators Join in Support of Texas

 

https://twitter.com/Wizard_Predicts/status/1337233445303562241

4 posted on 12/10/2020 7:41:52 PM PST by Enlightened1 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

I do not see how the States that are NOT Defendants of the lawsuit can legally insert their cases into this?

Now the Prosecutor can have other States that felt cheated join the lawsuits. The Defendant States are on their own. They can have supporters, but that is it.

Thus, I believe this is for the most part symbolic and nothing more. It will have no legal merit whatsoever.


5 posted on 12/10/2020 7:45:25 PM PST by Enlightened1 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Wyoming is supporting the suit.


6 posted on 12/10/2020 7:46:18 PM PST by cowboyusa (America Cowboy up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Yup, like other rapists coming to the defense of the rapist.


7 posted on 12/10/2020 7:50:15 PM PST by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1
Idaho Lt. Governor and Legislators Join in Support of Texas

As did the Pennsylvania legislature.

8 posted on 12/10/2020 7:50:29 PM PST by Road Warrior ‘04 (BOYCOTT The NFL, MLB, NBA, NASCAR & Faux Snooze! Molon Labe! Oathkeeper!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Road Warrior ‘04

And Georgia legislature, at least some of them


9 posted on 12/10/2020 7:51:35 PM PST by LilFarmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1
I do not see how the States that are NOT Defendants of the lawsuit can legally insert their cases into this?

Maybe they are not really parties but merely filed as amicus curiae statements (friend of the court). As I understand it early reports of states joining the suit turned out to be just amicus curiae statements friendly to the suit...think I heard there were 19. And then I think I heard there were 6 states that had actually joined Texas for the suit as parties, or at least filed to.

Legal stuff is very technical, and in this day of rapid news by internet, us layman get confused.

10 posted on 12/10/2020 7:52:21 PM PST by AndyTheBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

CWII is on!

US against them!


11 posted on 12/10/2020 7:52:34 PM PST by Road Warrior ‘04 (BOYCOTT The NFL, MLB, NBA, NASCAR & Faux Snooze! Molon Labe! Oathkeeper!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

I disagree. I believe that any state that did its job and maintained sound electoral processes as outlined by the Constitution (That is, followed the legal instructions of its own State Legislature) can make a case that its own citizens were disenfranchised by other States that ignored the Constitution and its own State Legislatures which swung the election anti-Constitutionally towards Biden.


12 posted on 12/10/2020 7:53:16 PM PST by rlmorel ("I’d rather enjoy a risky freedom than a safe servitude." Robby Dinero, USMC Veteran, Gym Owner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

In my none legal opinion, states that enter the side of the defendants are themselves admitting that their actions could be unconstitutional.


13 posted on 12/10/2020 7:53:40 PM PST by Deaf Smith (When a Texan takes his chances, chances will be takfor sure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

States can sign on to the briefs of other states. At this point, every argument that can be made has been made.


14 posted on 12/10/2020 7:56:09 PM PST by WASCWatch ( WASC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1; fatima; Fresh Wind; st.eqed; xsmommy; House Atreides; Nowhere Man; PaulZe; ...

Battle lines being formed for CW II.

Won’t be quite so clean because many “blue” states are really just a couple of blue cities with deep red in between.

Good luck getting food, metrosexuals!


15 posted on 12/10/2020 7:58:38 PM PST by lightman (I am a binary Trinitarian. Deal with it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Well... yeah.


16 posted on 12/10/2020 7:59:20 PM PST by Skywise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

What standing do the DEM AG’s have in the case? NONE, they are not aggrieved in any meaningful way.


17 posted on 12/10/2020 7:59:30 PM PST by Trump_vs_Evil_Witch (Clean out the DOJ, CIA & FBI, top-to-bottom, Barr, Haspel & Wray first)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

You might want to reread what I said.


18 posted on 12/10/2020 8:03:00 PM PST by Enlightened1 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Great idea, why not divide the country and let their be red and blue America.


19 posted on 12/10/2020 8:05:06 PM PST by kempster (w President of all time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Roberts theory about no Democrat or Republican judges has been blown to smithereens. Attorney generals are supposed to enforce the law. It would have been good had some Democrat attorney generals sided with Texas. Is he too blind to see it?


20 posted on 12/10/2020 8:05:43 PM PST by alternatives? (If our borders are not secure, why fund an army?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson