Posted on 11/10/2020 8:47:15 PM PST by SeekAndFind
There have been a lot of allegations of voter fraud and irregularities across the states currently being contested in the election.
But one of them, in Clark County, Nevada seems pretty hard to argue away, and it may be the sign of a much wider fraud.
Rosemarie Hartle voted in the 2020 election. But there was a small problem with that. Rosemarie Hartle died in 2017 of breast cancer, as her husband Kirk explained. The records show that the ballot was sent October 9 and returned the day before Election Day. Kirk Hartle explained that it never came to their house and he never returned it. Even more troubling? Nevada officials say that her signature on the ballot is a match to the one they have on record.
8 News Now reports on a woman who died in 2017 voting in the 2020 election in Nevada
pic.twitter.com/ojZM6Eey7q— Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) November 10, 2020
So why is this possibly indicative of a wider fraud? Hartle never got the ballot, yet it was returned with her signature matching the records. So you had to have someone not only have access to the ballot without it reaching her house and also have access to her signature. Who do you think that points to? I don’t know about you, but that screams someone in the board of elections. And if so, then does anyone really think that they are restricting it to only one person? This is one of the people they found. But having that signature match is a real red flag, potentially, for a deeper problem. Either that or if they are using a machine to match the signatures, it’s obviously not working which then calls into question whether it appropriately verified other ballots.
The GOP are also challenging ballots of people who may not have properly lived in Nevada at the time their ballots were cast.
Everyone, Democrat or Republican should care about this. Because it isn’t only about President Donald Trump and Joe Biden. It’s about ever being able to have confidence in our elections and preventing such fraud. We should all want transparency on the subject.
I doubt that vote fraudsters stop at one fraudulent vote.
That word, "should", is a mighty big word that means nothing to Democrats.
Democrats have consistently opposed any purging of the voter rolls. President Trump’s voter fraud commission was disbanded because States refused to comply with the request to turn over their voter rolls.
Why do people try to make this so hard. It's simple. A large number of dead people voting is election fraud. It's that simple. It's not an indiciae of fraud. It is fraud. It's two frauds, actually. Causing the name of an ineligible person to be placed on the voting roles, and then casting a vote not cast by the person on the role.
Dead man voting.
RE: Why do people try to make this so hard. It’s simple. A large number of dead people voting is election fraud. It’s that simple. It’s not an indiciae of fraud. It is fraud.
The Democrats and the Media have changed their argument from “There’s no evidence of fraud” to “Even if there is evidence of fraud, so what? Every election has fraud. The issue is, this fraud IS NOT LARGE ENOUGH to affect the votes that Biden has that will swing the election back to Trump.”
The key word you MUST use in describing this is SYSTEMIC fraud.
It is not “voter” fraud where one person commits a fraud.
The fraud is not a “single vote” problem.
It is SYSTEMIC ELECTION FRAUD... where a corrupt system alters the results of elections...
I vote to ban the word “systemic” from the english language.
Can we get rid of “existential” first?
A voter’s signature is likely stored electronically. I’m curious in this case if someone simply forged the signature or they electronically copied the signature onto the ballot.
Yes.
Frankly, I could never understand this “nice” loosing mentality.
We know, we lost by fraud, but we will do nothing about it, because...???
Stealing election is coup d’etat.
And we rightly oppose stealing elections in Belarus or Ukraine, but it is OK in the US?!
Nevada used signature-matching software. They started out screening for a 90% match or better, and eventually lowered it to 30%.
Or does the signature actually match?
Dead man voting and forging.
# frauds..NOT 2...the third is a civil rights violation- the consequent disenfranchisement of the vote of a citizen
If ANY fraud is starting to bubble over into the public sphere...you can be sure its the tip of an iceberg.
“small amounts” of fraud are not worth it. Risk/reward isn’t there. Fraud has to be of sufficient magnitude to influence results. Therefore any fraud emerging into the public is of material significance
3 frauds....
Actually as shipwreckedcrew [20 year DOJ prosecutor] at RedState wrote, the standard is whether the fraud is sufficient to question the validity of the outcome, not can you PROVE that but for the fraud the outcome would have been different. After the other party commits widespread fraud, the burden of proof that it wouldn’t make any difference falls on him.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.