[AndyJackson]

So why is this possibly indicative of a wider fraud? Hartle never got the ballot, yet it was returned with her signature matching the records. So you had to have someone not only have access to the ballot without it reaching her house and also have access to her signature. Who do you think that points to? I don’t know about you, but that screams someone in the board of elections. And if so, then does anyone really think that they are restricting it to only one person? This is one of the people they found. But having that signature match is a real red flag, potentially, for a deeper problem. Either that or if they are using a machine to match the signatures, it’s obviously not working which then calls into question whether it appropriately verified other ballots.

Why do people try to make this so hard. It's simple. A large number of dead people voting is election fraud. It's that simple. It's not an indiciae of fraud. It is fraud. It's two frauds, actually. Causing the name of an ineligible person to be placed on the voting roles, and then casting a vote not cast by the person on the role.

[SeekAndFind]

RE: Why do people try to make this so hard. It’s simple. A large number of dead people voting is election fraud. It’s that simple. It’s not an indiciae of fraud. It is fraud.

The Democrats and the Media have changed their argument from “There’s no evidence of fraud” to “Even if there is evidence of fraud, so what? Every election has fraud. The issue is, this fraud IS NOT LARGE ENOUGH to affect the votes that Biden has that will swing the election back to Trump.”

[mo]

# frauds..NOT 2...the third is a civil rights violation- the consequent disenfranchisement of the vote of a citizen