[VANITY] Rumor has it Amy Barrett is front runner to replace the late Ruth Ginsburg - thoughts?

Various | Today | Self

[FRinCanada2]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amy_Coney_Barrett

Good choice? Bad Choice? Controversial? Odds of getting a Senate vote before 3 November?

[jpsb]

Is Joan Larsen on Trump’s list? She is very impressive too.

[jpsb]

I said the best. There are plenty of people qualified that does not make them the best.

[Wuli]

Yes, for the Left/Progs/Dims “Much, much worse than a straight, white male is a free-thinking black or free-thinking woman.”

They will try to lynch a GOP “her” like they tried to do to Clarence Thomas.

[Shadow44]

So you think that the Supreme Court got to be almost entirely composed of Catholics and Jews in a majority Protestant country simply because they’re the best?

[KevinB]

Why is she to blame for who her father IN LAW is?

I guess reading comprehension is not your strong suit. My post very clearly was referring to Lagoa's FIL being a Clinton nominee not Barrett's.

[GonzoII]

“Founding-era legislatures did..... Founding-era legislatures imposed..”

Speaks volumes to me and backs up the claims that she is an originalist.

[wardaddy]

Amen on both

[wardaddy]

Lol

Nice retort

It’s loaded that way because urban elitists make our picks

Although I like Amy a lot

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Interesting how you removed the context of the statements to prove your personal bias.

Where did you get your fake news credentials?

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Why does religion matter?

Are you saying the religious composition of the court should have quotas?

Should it also have race quotas?

[Shadow44]

It obviously does matter, since the amount of Protestants are grossly underrepresented on the Supreme Court, as are Southerners. This is the result of discrimination and everyone knows this.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Only to bigots.

[Shadow44]

And why aren’t people like William Pryor on the Supreme Court? Because of bigotry.

[Hot Tabasco]

Don't need a vanity to get a conversation started since there are a myriad of actual published articles circulating here that are addressing that very thing.....

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Racists are people who are obsessed with race and make everything about race.

Much like you and religion.

[Shadow44]

I'm not Southern, nor am I Protestant. My ancestry is mixed, and I'm have no ties to the founding stock of this country. The people who are the demographic core of this country are discriminated against. Apparently not even people on Free Republic will stand up for them, so I will. The fact that people here are apoplectic that the Founding stock of this country should have at least ONE person on the Supreme Court goes to show this place has become filled with leftists going the speed limit.

[Varsity Flight]

Remember Pelosi laughing at us when she had the Bart vote for OBondageCare.

[GonzoII]

How did you come up with “personal bias” and “fake news credentials” from a post that quotes from your sources indicating that ACB refers to precedent in the 18th century to defend 2A rights?

[E. Pluribus Unum]

I repeat my question: Should there be racial, gender, religious, etc. quotas for justices on the United States Supreme Court?

Or just religious quotas?

[Shadow44]

Should there be quotas? No. But to suggest there isn’t already de facto discrimination going on is absurd.