Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

75 Years Later, It’s Clear Truman Was Right To Drop The Atomic Bomb
The Federalist ^ | 08/06/2020 | Joshua Larson

Posted on 08/06/2020 10:18:12 AM PDT by DFG

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last
To: DFG

The negative views all come from the Left and ignore the (a) predictable consequences of an all out invasion of the main island of Japan and (b) the very high likelihood that that is what the Japanese military would have otherwise required of the U.S., in order for the U.S. to have achieved a Japanese surrender. That all out invasion would have included tons of conventional bombing all over Japan, to “soften it up”, producing more total deaths and destruction nationwide than that produced at Nagasaki and Hiroshima.


21 posted on 08/06/2020 11:16:55 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DFG

My father was 17 when the war ended, turning 18 in November. Through high school ROTC he had 200 hours in gliders and 100 hours in powered aircraft. Next stop would have been Japan for him. Instead next stop was engineering school.


22 posted on 08/06/2020 11:24:37 AM PDT by The Free Engineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DFG

Edward Luttwak, the American political scientist who has studied the history of this decision was on Steve Bannon’s podcast this morning and had an interesting comment. The decision to actually use the bomb on a city in Japan was approved by a panel of military and civilian experts well in advance of Truman’s final approval and before it had even been tested.

None of the panel was briefed on or had any awareness of the effects that the radiation would have on the population. They all believed it would just explode but not generate further casualties from fallout.


23 posted on 08/06/2020 11:25:04 AM PDT by Dave Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DFG

The argument that Japan would have surrendered without the bomb is false. The Japanese Army was itching to fight us. Throughout WWII we had faced mostly Japanese Navy ground forces in the island campaigns and some Japanese Army units but the bulk of the Japanese Army sought direct battle. They believed that in order to “lose honorably” to us they had to take millions of casualties amongst the Japanese civilians. But in fact there would have been no civilians.

The Japanese were mobilizing their entire population. Women with spears. Children. Civilians who would allow our forces to pass by and then engage in biological and chemical attacks. There were tons of of cheap wooden kamikaze planes planned that didn’t show up on radar. Plus loads of kamikaze boats. The fighting and tenacity of the Japanese would have been worse even than at Okinawa and Iwo Jima. A landing may very well have failed.

Hirohito did acknowledge that the A-bombs were the impetus that finally got him to accept surrender. A million weasel words won’t change the fact that the A-bombs were necessary. It’s easy to sit behind a desk smoking a pipe and talk about these things. None of the people who decry the bomb are in the demographic of those who would have had to storm the beaches. The lives of the farm boys and mechanics who fought the Japanese were just as important as the self-satisfied academics who condemn them. Actually the lives of those men are worth more than any pundit or professor.


24 posted on 08/06/2020 11:28:12 AM PDT by Seruzawa (TANSTAAFL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DFG

I was around and sentient: it was a highly favored move by an overwhelming number of the American people at the time.


25 posted on 08/06/2020 11:28:18 AM PDT by Salvey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 1ofmanyfree; 21twelve; 24Karet; 2ndDivisionVet; 31R1O; ...
Thanks DFG.

26 posted on 08/06/2020 11:31:55 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DFG

27 posted on 08/06/2020 11:33:49 AM PDT by Varda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

Left wing propaganda has been incredibly effective. Even conservatives have bought the bombing necessity. Because of FDR’s “unconditional surrender” demand the Japanese fought on long after it was obvious they had lost. They saw the results of the Morgenthau Plan philosophy in Germany and thought it didn’t matter if they fought to the death. Had there been a negotiated peace where they retained Korea and Manchuria there would have been no Korean War or Red China. Soviet agents in the U.S. government did not want this. In the end the Japanese did not surrender unconditionally. They were allowed to keep the emperor. No one commented that there were opposing views: William D. Leahy - “It is my opinion that the use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender because of the effective sea blockade and the successful bombing with conventional weapons.” (I Was There, pg. 441). Gen. Curtis LeMay, former head of Strategic Air Command, “We torched and boiled and baked to death more people in Tokyo that night of March 9-10 than went up in vapor in Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined.”


28 posted on 08/06/2020 11:38:55 AM PDT by Vehmgericht (12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: DFG
I've been to Peace Park and seen the "evil American" propaganda.

Nukes are a horrible weapon. Period.

But... Some times horror is exactly what it takes to end a war. You do not go into a fight with one hand tied behind your back. Especially against an enemy who knows no limits to what they would do to win. That is idiocy.

It was right then, and it could be argued that we should have probably used one or two more since then.

Until we come up with something equivalent, it will still be needed tomorrow as well.

29 posted on 08/06/2020 11:40:29 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (A Psalm in napalm...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JudgemAll
“It basically allowed us to avoid dividing Japan with the Soviets like it happened in Germany”

A major and often overlooked reason to force an end to the war. That and the fact that the Japs were willing to all die and take us with them sealed the deal.

I have read extensively about WWII all my life. The enemies in Europe were seen and (generally) treated as reasonable combatants.

In the Pacific the Japs were viewed like cockroaches who could only be subdued by killing the lot. There was no reasoning with them and the mentality that they would die to serve their emperor was totally alien. Starting Leyte Gulf and suicide fliers which terrified our Navy I think the die was cast to end the war no matter how. Just my 2¢

30 posted on 08/06/2020 11:47:37 AM PDT by lowbuck (The Blue Card (US Passport) Don't leave home without it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Vehmgericht

1. “Had there been a negotiated peace where they retained Korea and Manchuria there would have been no Korean War or Red China.”

The prospects of that under any U.S. administration was nil. Its pure crystal ball fantasy.

2. Leahy said: “The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender because of the effective sea blockade and the successful bombing with conventional weapons ... “

But in fact there is no proof in the diplomatic record that Japan had officially adopted that position.


31 posted on 08/06/2020 12:02:51 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

The Japanese would have fought to the last man as they did on all the islands leading up to the homeland. Millions would have died.


32 posted on 08/06/2020 12:08:37 PM PDT by Don Corleone (The truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Seruzawa

My late father-in-law served in the 4th. Marine Division and was wounded on Iwo Jima. He got the ‘’million dollar wound’’-a leg wound and it got him off that horrible island. he came home, met and married my late mother-in-law and they had four girls, one of them is my wife.

Those bombs saved his life and because of that I have a wife.


33 posted on 08/06/2020 12:12:01 PM PDT by jmacusa (If we're all equal how is diversity our strength?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Several artifacts at the WWII Museum in NOLA of this event. Col. Tibbett’s watch, a copy of the operation order, co-pilot log book, General Groves’ uniform.


34 posted on 08/06/2020 12:13:00 PM PDT by abb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: DFG

pleasure-pain principle:cause the Japs enough pain and they stopped


35 posted on 08/06/2020 12:39:22 PM PDT by mjp ((pro-{God, reality, reason, egoism, individualism, natural rights, limited government, capitalism}))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DFG
Let me look at this a different way. If Imperial Japan or Nazi Germany had the bomb and the capability to deliver it, do you think they'd have used it? I'm totally confident they would have with no moral compunction or regrets.

A close relative of mine, a Marine, was in Tientsin, China waiting for the invasion of Japan. The bombs saved him, his descendants, and millions of other Americans and Japanese. It was the right thing to do.

36 posted on 08/06/2020 12:44:38 PM PDT by Bernard Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa

My Dad had his orders for the invasion force in hand when the bombs ended the war. The bombs ended the war. Everyone in the US was overjoyed. F*** a bunch of academic handwringers.


37 posted on 08/06/2020 12:48:27 PM PDT by Seruzawa (TANSTAAFL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

We were living in Carrizozo, NM at that time. I was seven years old and still remember today stories going around town that we(the US) were building a bomb no bigger than a softball and it would destroy a whole city.


38 posted on 08/06/2020 1:34:47 PM PDT by saminfl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: DFG

That’s not what the Smithsonian says!


39 posted on 08/06/2020 1:36:17 PM PDT by Phil DiBasquette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DFG

That was before Guam tipped over!


40 posted on 08/06/2020 1:37:46 PM PDT by Phil DiBasquette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson